Volume 40 Issue 6
Jun 2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Xinyue, WANG Chenlong, LI Zhiqiang. Simulation and Calculation Study on Shaped Charge Liner Structure for Metal Jet Impact Detonation Propagation and Stable Detonation Propagation Distance[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2026, 40(6): 065201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251230
Citation: WANG Xinyue, WANG Chenlong, LI Zhiqiang. Simulation and Calculation Study on Shaped Charge Liner Structure for Metal Jet Impact Detonation Propagation and Stable Detonation Propagation Distance[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2026, 40(6): 065201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251230

Simulation and Calculation Study on Shaped Charge Liner Structure for Metal Jet Impact Detonation Propagation and Stable Detonation Propagation Distance

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251230
  • Received Date: 20 Oct 2025
  • Rev Recd Date: 05 Dec 2025
  • Available Online: 16 Dec 2025
  • Issue Publish Date: 05 Jun 2026
  • Gob-side entry retaining by roof cutting and pressure relief is widely employed in coal mining. However, the multi-segment air-decked charge structure used in its pre-splitting blasting requires a separate detonator for each charge segment, leading to problems such as high detonator consumption per borehole, elevated costs, operational complexity, and significant safety risks. To address this engineering challenge, the application of shaped metal jet impact-induced initiation technology in composite roof pre-splitting blasting has been proposed. Using LS-DYNA numerical simulation, a systematic investigation was conducted on liner structure optimization, factors affecting metal jet impact initiation, and the stable initiation distance. The findings demonstrate that the aluminum liner exhibits the optimal overall performance. With a cone angle of 60° and a wall thickness of 1 mm, it generates a shaped jet with high velocity, considerable length, and good continuity. In contrast, the copper liner, due to its high strength and high collapse energy threshold, fails to form an effective jet under low-power explosive charge conditions. Although the lead liner is readily accelerated, it produces jets with poor stability that are susceptible to necking and fragmentation. When the charge length-to-diameter ratio exceeds 3, the effective charge mass reaches saturation. Additional explosive energy is primarily dissipated through radial expansion and heat loss, resulting in the stabilization of both the maximum jet velocity and stable jet velocity. In an unconfined air environment, the maximum reliable initiation distance for a shaped jet from an aluminum liner (1 mm wall thickness, 60° cone angle) is 90 cm. Beyond this distance, jet stretching and attenuation lead to insufficient pressure to initiate the emulsion explosive. Confinement provided by steel pipes can significantly suppress the radial expansion of detonation products, enhancing energy utilization efficiency and consequently extending the initiation distance of the metal jet.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    WANG Y J, WANG Q, TIAN X C, et al. Stress and deformation evolution characteristics of gob-side entry retained by roof cutting and pressure relief [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 123: 104419. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2022.104419
    [2]
    YANG J, HE M C, CAO C. Design principles and key technologies of gob side entry retaining by roof pre-fracturing [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 90: 309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.05.013
    [3]
    CAO C, XIE Z Z, ZHANG N, et al. Differential roof cutting for roadway support in dual gob-side entry retention on a single working face—multilevel continuous anchor-grouting control technology: a case study [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2024, 163: 108475. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108475
    [4]
    汪旭光. 爆破设计与施工 [M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2011: 322, 360–363.

    WANG X G. Blasting design and construction [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2011: 322, 360–363.
    [5]
    孙磊, 贺海强, 沈国华. 电子雷管在某露天铜矿使用问题探究 [J]. 煤矿爆破, 2019, 37(2): 14–17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3970.2019.02.004

    SUN L, HE H Q, SHEN G H. Study on the use of electronic detonators in an open pit copper mine [J]. Coal Mine Blasting, 2019, 37(2): 14–17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3970.2019.02.004
    [6]
    张英豪, 张泽楠. 数码电子雷管应用问题的探讨 [J]. 火工品, 2018(4): 54–57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1480.2018.04.0014

    ZHANG Y H, ZHANG Z N. Discuss on the application of digital electronic detonator [J]. Initiators & Pyrotechnics, 2018(4): 54–57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1480.2018.04.0014
    [7]
    FREY R, LAWRENCE W, CHICK M. Shock evolution after shaped charge jet impact and its relevance to explosive initiation [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1995, 16(4): 563–570. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(94)00064-4
    [8]
    ARNOLD W, ROTTENKOLBER E. High explosive initiation behavior by shaped charge jet impacts [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 58: 184–193. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.022
    [9]
    MEHMANNAVAZ H, RAMEZANI A, NABAKHTEH M A, et al. A practical review study on shaped charge in the last two decades (2000–2020) [J]. International Journal of Protective Structures, 2021, 12(4): 665–693. doi: 10.1177/20414196211017923
    [10]
    王清标, 王涛, 田成林, 等. 周边孔聚能装置间隔装药在光面爆破中的应用研究 [J]爆破, 2024, 41(1): 77–84.

    WANG Q B, WANG T, TIAN C L, et al. Application of shaped charge device and decked charge in perimeter holes of smooth blasting [J]. Blasting, 2024, 41(1): 77–84.
    [11]
    CLUTTER J K, BELK D. Simulation of detonation wave interaction using an ignition and growth model [J]. Shock Waves, 2002, 12(3): 251–263. doi: 10.1007/s00193-002-0153-2
    [12]
    张雪梅, 谢兴博, 钟明寿, 等. 不同聚能装药水中冲击引爆靶后B炸药特性研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2025, 46(9): 241046. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.1046

    ZHANG X M, XIE X B, ZHONG M S, et al. Study on the characteristics of explosive B after impact detonation of different shaped charges on target in water [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(9): 241046. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.1046
    [13]
    刘忠磊, 王旭华, 王应魁, 等. 约束条件下聚能装置对乳化炸药引爆距离影响的研究 [J]. 爆破, 2024, 41(3): 171–178. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2024.03.021

    LIU Z L, WANG X H, WANG Y K, et al. Study on influence of fusion device on detonation distance of emulsion explosives under constraint conditions [J]. Blasting, 2024, 41(3): 171–178. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2024.03.021
    [14]
    李启月, 曾海登, 赵新浩, 等. 炮孔约束下双槽聚能管对乳化炸药殉爆距离影响的研究 [J]. 矿冶工程, 2020, 40(6): 1–4, 12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-6099.2020.06.001

    LI Q Y, ZENG H D, ZHAO X H, et al. Influence of double groove energy gathering tubes on the denotation distance of emulsion explosives under constraint of blast hole [J]. Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, 2020, 40(6): 1–4, 12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-6099.2020.06.001
    [15]
    陈思敏. 射流对运动带壳装药冲击起爆机理研究 [D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2022.

    CHEN S M. Research on the initiation mechanism of moving shelled charge under jet impact [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology, 2022.
    [16]
    黄正祥. 聚能装药理论与实践 [M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2014.

    HUANG Z X. Theory and practice of shaped charge [M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2014.
    [17]
    CHOU P C, FLIS W J. Recent developments in shaped charge technology [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 1986, 11(4): 99–114. doi: 10.1002/prep.19860110402
    [18]
    WANG C, DING J X, ZHAO H T. Numerical simulation on jet formation of shaped charge with different liner materials [J]. Defence Science Journal, 2015, 65(4): 279–286. doi: 10.14429/dsj.65.8648
    [19]
    SARAN S, AYISIT O, YAVUZ M S. Experimental investigations on aluminum shaped charge liners [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 58: 479–486. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.055
    [20]
    黄正祥. 聚能杆式侵彻体成型机理研究 [D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2003.

    HUANG Z X. Mechanism study on jetting projectile charge formation [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science & Technology, 2003.
    [21]
    王成, 王万军, 宁建国. 聚能装药对混凝土靶板的侵彻研究 [J]. 力学学报, 2015, 47(4): 672–686. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-14-336

    WANG C, WANG W J, NING J G. Investigation on shaped charge penetrating into concrete targets [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2015, 47(4): 672–686. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-14-336
    [22]
    李伟兵, 王晓鸣, 李文彬, 等. 装药长径比对聚能杆式侵彻体成型的影响 [J]. 弹道学报, 2011, 23(4): 61–65.

    LI W B, WANG X M, LI W B, et al. Effect of length-diameter ratio of charge on jetting projectile charge forming [J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2011, 23(4): 61–65.
    [23]
    辛春亮, 薛再清, 涂建, 等. 有限元分析常用材料参数手册 [M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2020.

    XIN C L, XUE Z Q, TU J, et al. Handbook of common material parameters for finite element analysis [M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2020.
    [24]
    YI C, NYBERG U, JOHANSSON D, et al. Ignition and growth reactive flow model for aluminized emulsion explosive [C]//46th Annual Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique. Denver, Colorado, USA, 2020: 26–29.
    [25]
    PUGH E M, EICHELBERGER R J, ROSTOKER N. Theory of jet formation by charges with lined conical cavities [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1952, 23(5): 532–536. doi: 10.1063/1.1702246
    [26]
    宋锦泉. 乳化炸药爆轰特性研究 [D]. 北京: 北京科技大学, 2000.

    SONG J Q. Research on detonation characteristics of emulsion explosives [D]. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2000.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(11)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(955) PDF downloads(88) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return