Volume 40 Issue 7
Jul 2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Dong, ZHANG Xiaobin, LIU Zhifang, LEI Jianyin. Impact Response and Design Optimization of Triangular Corrugated Sandwich Beams: A Machine Learning Approach[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2026, 40(7): 070111. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251287
Citation: LI Dong, ZHANG Xiaobin, LIU Zhifang, LEI Jianyin. Impact Response and Design Optimization of Triangular Corrugated Sandwich Beams: A Machine Learning Approach[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2026, 40(7): 070111. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251287

Impact Response and Design Optimization of Triangular Corrugated Sandwich Beams: A Machine Learning Approach

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251287
  • Received Date: 29 Dec 2025
  • Rev Recd Date: 13 Feb 2026
  • Available Online: 10 Mar 2026
  • Issue Publish Date: 05 Jul 2026
  • To enhance the prediction accuracy of low-velocity impact performance and improve the structural design efficiency of triangular corrugated sandwich beams, this paper proposes a machine learning modeling and optimization process for the impact response of sandwich beams based on a hard-parameter-sharing multi-task learning (MTL) framework. A sample dataset is generated using finite element models, and the rationality of the models is validated against existing experimental results. Subsequently, an MTL model is trained to simultaneously predict the structural specific energy absorption (SEA), the maximum deflection of the top panel, and the initial peak load. The results show that the MTL model optimized via Bayesian optimization demonstrates strong predictive performance under a 50 J impact energy condition. The predictions align well with the finite element simulation results, with the coefficient of determination R2 for all output variables in the test set exceeding 0.989, thereby validating the effectiveness and reliability of the model in response prediction and engineering optimization analysis. Parameter sensitivity analysis reveals that the core cell count and core wall thickness have the most significant influence on structural stiffness, followed by the top panel thickness, while the bottom panel thickness has a relatively minor impact. Moreover, the core wall thickness exhibits a certain saturation threshold in terms of performance enhancement. In combination with the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm Ⅱ (NSGA-Ⅱ), multi-objective optimization analysis are conducted focusing on deformation characteristics, energy absorption performance, and comprehensive performance, and yields optimal parameter configurations that meet different engineering design requirements for sandwich beams.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ZHANG D J, ZHAO Z Y, DU S F, et al. Dynamic response of ultralight all-metallic sandwich panel with 3D tube cellular core to shallow-buried explosives [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2021, 64(7): 1371–1388. doi: 10.1007/s11431-020-1774-1
    [2]
    LE V T, HA N S, GOO N S. Advanced sandwich structures for thermal protection systems in hypersonic vehicles: a review [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2021, 226: 109301. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109301
    [3]
    WANG J F, SHI C Y, YANG N, et al. Strength, stiffness, and panel peeling strength of carbon fiber-reinforced composite sandwich structures with aluminum honeycomb cores for vehicle body [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 184: 1189–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.038
    [4]
    CHAHARDOLI S, ATTAR A A, GHORBANHOSSEINI S, et al. Investigation of the bending and crushing for the light-weight structures used in vehicle’s radiator [J]. Mechanics Based Design of Structures and Machines, 2023, 51(8): 4491–4507. doi: 10.1080/15397734.2021.1967165
    [5]
    SHU C F, ZHAO S Y, HOU S J. Crashworthiness analysis of two-layered corrugated sandwich panels under crushing loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 133: 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.09.008
    [6]
    LIU K, ZONG S, LI Y, et al. Structural response of the U-type corrugated core sandwich panel used in ship structures under the lateral quasi-static compression load [J]. Marine Structures, 2022, 84: 103198. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2022.103198
    [7]
    RUBINO V, DESHPANDE V S, FLECK N A. The dynamic response of end-clamped sandwich beams with a Y-frame or corrugated core [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(8): 829–844. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.10.006
    [8]
    RUBINO V, DESHPANDE V S, FLECK N A. The three-point bending of Y-frame and corrugated core sandwich beams [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2010, 52(3): 485–494. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.11.009
    [9]
    ST-PIERRE L, DESHPANDE V S, FLECK N A. The low velocity impact response of sandwich beams with a corrugated core or a Y-frame core [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2015, 91: 71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.02.014
    [10]
    XIA F K, YU T X, DURANDET Y, et al. Triangular corrugated sandwich panels under longitudinal bending [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, 169: 108359. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108359
    [11]
    LIU J Z, LI S, GUO J C, et al. Machine learning (ML) based models for predicting the ultimate bending moment resistance of high strength steel welded I-section beam under bending [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2023, 191: 111051. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2023.111051
    [12]
    FORD E, MANEPARAMBIL K, KUMAR A, et al. Transfer (machine) learning approaches coupled with target data augmentation to predict the mechanical properties of concrete [J]. Machine Learning with Applications, 2022, 8: 100271. doi: 10.1016/j.mlwa.2022.100271
    [13]
    YANG L, LIN H, WEI L C, et al. Application of a novel machine learning model for the prediction and optimization of anti-blast performance of sandwich honeycomb blast walls [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2024, 312: 119217. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.119217
    [14]
    FANG X, SHEN H S, WANG H. Three-point bending behaviors of sandwich beams with data-driven 3D auxetic lattice core based on deep learning [J]. Composite Structures, 2025, 354: 118751. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118751
    [15]
    ANDIKA, SANTOSA S P, WIDAGDO D, et al. Design and multi-objective optimization of auxetic sandwich panels for blastworthy structures using machine learning method [J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(23): 10831. doi: 10.3390/app142310831
    [16]
    QIU W J, LIU K, ZONG S, et al. An optimisation method for anti-blast performance of corrugated sandwich plate structure based on neural network and sparrow search algorithm [J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2024, 19(8): 1028–1043. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2023.2226488
    [17]
    TEIMOURI A, ALINIA M, KAMARIAN S, et al. Design optimization of additively manufactured sandwich beams through experimentation, machine learning, and imperialist competitive algorithm [J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2024, 35(3): 320–337. doi: 10.1080/09544828.2024.2309862
    [18]
    MCKAY M D, BECKMAN R J, CONOVER W J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code [J]. Technometrics, 1979, 21(2): 239–245. doi: 10.2307/1268522
    [19]
    CARUANA R. Multitask learning [J]. Machine Learning, 1997, 28(1): 41–75. doi: 10.1023/A:1007379606734
    [20]
    SNOEK J, LAROCHELLE H, ADAMS R P. Practical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms [C]//Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Lake Tahoe: Curran Associates Inc., 2012: 2951–2959.
    [21]
    DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-Ⅱ [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197. doi: 10.1109/4235.996017
    [22]
    JING L, SU X Y, CHEN D, et al. Experimental and numerical study of sandwich beams with layered-gradient foam cores under low-velocity impact [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 135: 227–244. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.11.011
    [23]
    LIU Z S, YU Y Y, YANG Z, et al. Dynamic experimental studies of A6N01S-T5 aluminum alloy material and structure for high-speed trains [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2019, 35(4): 763–772. doi: 10.1007/s10409-018-0830-8
    [24]
    YU Z H, LIU K, ZHOU X F, et al. Low-velocity impact response of aluminum alloy corrugated sandwich beams used for high-speed trains [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2023, 183: 110375. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.110375
    [25]
    荣吉利, 王圣龙, 陈子超, 等. 水下爆炸冲击载荷下波纹夹芯板动态响应及结构优化设计 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2024, 44(7): 679–691.

    RONG J L, WANG S L, CHEN Z C, et al. Dynamic response and structural optimal design of corrugated sandwich panel subjected to underwater explosion impact loads [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2024, 44(7): 679–691.
    [26]
    卢传浩, 周宇琦, 曹勇, 等. 新型梯度连续可控夹层板抗冲击性能研究及优化 [J]. 力学学报, 2024, 56(6): 1713–1726. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-23-569

    LU C H, ZHOU Y Q, CAO Y, et al. Research and optimization of impact resistance of novel gradient continuous controllable sandwich panels [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2024, 56(6): 1713–1726. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-23-569
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(20)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(763) PDF downloads(68) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return