Volume 40 Issue 7
Jul 2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAO Changfang, LIU Hao, ZHOU Caihua, ZHOU Zhitan, JI Liang. Experimental Study on the Impact Dynamics Behavior of Ultrathin Carbon Fiber Composites[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2026, 40(7): 070108. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251265
Citation: ZHAO Changfang, LIU Hao, ZHOU Caihua, ZHOU Zhitan, JI Liang. Experimental Study on the Impact Dynamics Behavior of Ultrathin Carbon Fiber Composites[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2026, 40(7): 070108. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251265

Experimental Study on the Impact Dynamics Behavior of Ultrathin Carbon Fiber Composites

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20251265
  • Received Date: 21 Nov 2025
  • Rev Recd Date: 22 Dec 2025
  • Available Online: 01 Jan 2026
  • Issue Publish Date: 05 Jul 2026
  • Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP), as an advanced composite material, are widely used in engineering applications. However, research on the dynamic mechanical behavior of ultrathin CFRP laminates remains relatively limited. In this study, unidirectional ultrathin prepreg and hot-pressing molding processes were employed to fabricate ultrathin CFRP laminates with a single ply thickness of only 0.1 mm. The strain rate effects on specimens with five different ply orientations—0°, 90°, 0°/90°, 45°, and ±45°—were systematically investigated. Quasi-static compression experiments indicated that the 45° ply orientation enhanced plastic behavior but reduced material strength and modulus, whereas the 90° ply orientation contributed to increased modulus and strength while reducing plastic deformation. Dynamic impact tests revealed that the 90° ply orientation improved both dynamic modulus and strength while decreasing yield strain. Although the 45° ply orientation reduced dynamic yield strength, it significantly increased the sensitivity of dynamic modulus and yield strain to strain rate. Compared with conventional CFRP laminates with a 0°/90° ply layup (ply thickness is 0.295 mm, and dynamic strength and modulus are 900 MPa and 10.12 GPa, respectively), the ultrathin CFRP composites developed in this study exhibited a 66% increase in fiber content per unit thickness; under the 0°/90° ply configuration, dynamic strength and modulus were enhanced by 123% and 926%, respectively. Based on the experimental data, a constitutive model for the ultrathin CFRP composites was established, and corresponding constitutive parameters were provided, offering a basis for predicting the mechanical behavior of CFRPs under different ply orientations and strain rates.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    YANG S P, WANG T T, ZHANG J N, et al. Characteristics of lamb wave dispersion in carbon fiber reinforced polymer laminates with arbitrary layup configurations [J]. Engineered Science, 2025, 39: 1944. doi: 10.30919/es1944
    [2]
    SUN G Y, CHEN D D, ZHU G H, et al. Lightweight hybrid materials and structures for energy absorption: a state-of-the-art review and outlook [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2022, 172: 108760. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2021.108760
    [3]
    赵昌方, FEDULOV B N, 刘浩. 层合碳纤维复合材料拉胀超结构的力学行为研究 [J]. 材料导报, 2026, 40(2): 25020163. doi: 10.11896/cldb.25020163

    ZHAO C F, FEDULOV B N, LIU H. Study on the mechanical behaviour of auxetic meta-structures made from laminated CFRP [J]. Materials Reports, 2026, 40(2): 25020163. doi: 10.11896/cldb.25020163
    [4]
    ZHAO C F. Mechanical constitutive models of fiber reinforced plastics for finite element analysis [M]//VIZUREANU P. Composite Materials-Science and Engineering. London: IntechOpen Limited, 2024: 6-1–6-31.
    [5]
    FERREIRA J A M, OLIVEIRA S, SILVA J, et al. Effect of machining parameters on the mechanical properties of high dosage short—carbon-fiber reinforced composites [J]. Fracture and Structural Integrity, 2019, 13(48): 249–256. doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.48.26
    [6]
    ZHAO C F, ZHOU Z T, ZHAO C X, et al. Research on compression properties of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin composite (UCFREP) [J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2021, 55(11): 1447–1458. doi: 10.1177/0021998320972176
    [7]
    ZHAO C F, REN R, SUN C B, et al. Compression mechanics for carbon-fiber reinforced epoxy resin composites under inplane and out-of-plane quasi-static and dynamic loadings [J]. Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2023, 59(3): 507–520. doi: 10.1007/s11029-023-10112-y
    [8]
    EKŞI S, GENEL K. Comparison of mechanical properties of unidirectional and woven carbon, glass and aramid fiber reinforced epoxy composites [J]. Acta Physica Polonica A, 2017, 132(3-Ⅱ): 879–882. doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.132.879
    [9]
    CHEN X M, CHEN L, ZHANG C Y, et al. Three-dimensional needle-punching for composites—a review [J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2016, 85: 12–30. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.004
    [10]
    REN J, LIU S J, WANG J H, et al. Energy absorption characteristics of CFRP-aluminum foam composite structure under high-velocity impact: focusing on varying aspect ratios and relative densities [J]. Polymers, 2025, 17(15): 2162. doi: 10.3390/polym17152162
    [11]
    ZHAO C F, ZHONG J L, WANG H X, et al. Impact behaviour and protection performance of a CFRP NPR skeleton filled with aluminum foam [J]. Materials & Design, 2024, 246: 113295. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113295
    [12]
    ZHANG J, LIN G, VAIDYA U, et al. Past, present and future prospective of global carbon fibre composite developments and applications [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2023, 250: 110463. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110463
    [13]
    MAMALIS A G, MANOLAKOS D E, IOANNIDIS M B, et al. On the response of thin-walled CFRP composite tubular components subjected to static and dynamic axial compressive loading: experimental [J]. Composite Structures, 2005, 69(4): 407–420. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.07.021
    [14]
    KARGER-KOCSIS J, MAHMOOD H, PEGORETTI A. Recent advances in fiber/matrix interphase engineering for polymer composites [J]. Progress in Materials Science, 2015, 73: 1–43. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.003
    [15]
    ZHAO C F, ZHONG J L, WANG H X, et al. Complete constitutive model of CFRP including continuous damage in low strain rate compression and temperature generation in high strain rate impact [J]. Polymer Composites, 2024, 45(5): 3965–3989. doi: 10.1002/pc.28037
    [16]
    ZHONG J L, ZHAO C F, REN J, et al. A constitutive model for carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin laminate under compression load: considering the initial non-linearity [J]. Applied Composite Materials, 2022, 29(2): 629–649. doi: 10.1007/s10443-021-09979-8
    [17]
    ZHANG M H, YU Y L, LI L, et al. A molecular dynamics assisted insight on damping enhancement in carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites with oriented multilayer graphene oxide coatings [J]. Microstructures, 2024, 4: 2024051. doi: 10.20517/microstructures.2024.29
    [18]
    DAEI-SORKHABI A H, HOSSEINZADEH-NODEHI S F. Numerical study of the effect of carbon fiber/epoxy resin adhesive thickness on the creep behaviour of carbon steel plate joints [J]. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2019, 33(16): 1790–1805. doi: 10.1080/01694243.2019.1613946
    [19]
    BUI T Q, HU X F. A review of phase-field models, fundamentals and their applications to composite laminates [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2021, 248: 107705. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2021.107705
    [20]
    HARLE S M. Durability and long-term performance of fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composites: a review [J]. Structures, 2024, 60: 105881. doi: 10.1016/j.istruc.2024.105881
    [21]
    ZHANG K B, LI W B, ZHENG Y, et al. Dynamic constitutive model of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE): considering the temperature and strain rate effects [J]. Polymers, 2020, 12(7): 1561. doi: 10.3390/polym12071561
    [22]
    OCHOLA R O, MARCUS K, NURICK G N, et al. Mechanical behaviour of glass and carbon fibre reinforced composites at varying strain rates [J]. Composite Structures, 2004, 63(3/4): 455–467. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00194-6
    [23]
    SONG Z H, WANG Z H, MA H W, et al. Mechanical behavior and failure mode of woven carbon/epoxy laminate composites under dynamic compressive loading [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2014, 60: 531–536. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.12.060
    [24]
    SCHMACK T, FILIPE T, DEINZER G, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of the strain rate-dependent compression behaviour of a carbon-epoxy structure [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 189: 256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.025
    [25]
    CHOCRON S, CARPENTER A J, SCOTT N L, et al. Impact on carbon fiber composite: ballistic tests, material tests, and computer simulations [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 131: 39–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.002
    [26]
    赵昌林, 何永明. 平纹碳纤维复合材料拉伸及环氧树脂压缩力学实验研究 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2022, 43(6): 309–316. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2022.06.047

    ZHAO C L, HE Y M. Tensile properties of plain woven carbon fiber reinforced composite and compressive behaviors of epoxy resin: an experimental investigation [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2022, 43(6): 309–316. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2022.06.047
    [27]
    YAMAZAKI Y, KOYANAGI J, SAWAMURA Y, et al. Numerical simulation of dynamic failure behavior for cylindrical carbon fiber reinforced polymer [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 203: 934–942. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.075
    [28]
    IVANČEVIĆ D, RATKOVIĆ J, GIANNAROS E. Strain rate-dependent failure modelling of impact damage in laminated CFRP structures [J]. Composite Structures, 2024, 330: 117817. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117817
    [29]
    MASSAQ A, RUSINEK A, KLOSAK M, et al. Strain rate effect on the mechanical behavior of polyamide composites under compression loading [J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 214: 114–122. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.101
    [30]
    REDDY S B K, JAGADEESH G V, KRISHNA T S. Effect of fiber orientation and ply thickness on mechanical behavior of laminated composites [M]//RAJKUMAR K, JAYAMANI E, RAMKUMAR P. Recent Advances in Materials Technologies. Singapore: Springer, 2023: 259−265.
    [31]
    REN M F, LIU Y P, HAN Y Z, et al. Study on tensile properties of ultra-thin-ply carbon fiber-reinforced composite laminates under static load [J]. Polymer Composites, 2024, 45(10): 9079–9087. doi: 10.1002/pc.28395
    [32]
    LIU H L, MA X Q, JIANG L, et al. Effect of ply thickness on tensile and bending performances of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic unidirectional laminate [J]. Polymer Composites, 2023, 44(3): 1889–1901. doi: 10.1002/pc.27212
    [33]
    LAUX T, GAN K W, DULIEU-BARTON J M, et al. Ply thickness and fibre orientation effects in multidirectional composite laminates subjected to combined tension/compression and shear [J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2020, 133: 105864. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105864
    [34]
    UNGER R, EXNER W, ARASH B, et al. Non-linear viscoelasticity of epoxy resins: molecular simulation-based prediction and experimental validation [J]. Polymer, 2019, 180: 121722. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.121722
    [35]
    赵昌方. 一种碳纤维复合材料拉胀超结构的冲击动力学行为研究 [J]. 航空制造技术, 2025, 68(12): 24–31. doi: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2025.12.024

    ZHAO C F. Study on impact dynamics behavior of an auxetic meta-structure made from carbon fiber reinforced composites [J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2025, 68(12): 24–31. doi: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2025.12.024
    [36]
    邹凯, 刘峥, 赵昌方, 等. 不同温度下环氧树脂的高应变率冲击行为研究 [J]. 复合材料科学与工程, 2025(8): 1–7. doi: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20250828.001

    ZOU K, LIU Z, ZHAO C F, et al. High strain rate impact behaviour of epoxy resins at different temperatures [J]. Composites Science and Engineering, 2025(8): 1–7. doi: 10.19936/j.cnki.2096-8000.20250828.001
    [37]
    林作泓, 高玉波, 卢涛. 碳纤维复合材料层合板的动态力学性能及失效机制 [J]. 中北大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 45(4): 550–556. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3193.2024.04.017

    LIN Z H, GAO Y B, LU T. Dynamic mechanical property and failure mechanism of carbon fiber composite laminates [J]. Journal of North University of China (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 45(4): 550–556. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3193.2024.04.017
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(1241) PDF downloads(94) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related
    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return