
Citation: | LIU Jinyu, CUI Xiangyue, LIU Ailing, CHENG Xiaoran, WANG Xingyu, WANG Yujia, ZHANG Miao. Prediction of Superconducting RbBSi Compounds under Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2024, 38(2): 020107. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230765 |
The development of superconductors at high temperatures or even ambient temperature has been a long-standing goal in the scientific community since 1911[1]. Superconductors have great applications in various fields, such as power transmission, magnetic resonance imaging, and quantum computing[2–4]. In recent years, there has been a major breakthrough in the field of new phonon-mediated superconductor, specifically in the study of clathrate hydrides. Clathrate hydrides attract attention due to their unique crystal structure and high superconducting critical temperatures above 200 K under high pressure[5–8]. One noteworthy discovery is CaH6, and this hydride exhibits a superconducting critical temperature (Tc) of 215 K at 172 GPa[9–10]. This is followed by the discovery of LaH10, and it has Tc of 260 K at about 170 GPa[11–13]. While these high-Tc hydrides show promising superconducting properties, they require comparable high pressures to synthesize and are typically unrecoverable at ambient pressure, limiting their practical applications. Researchers continue to explore novel materials and mechanisms that can exhibit superconductivity at more accessible conditions. Such advancements would greatly enhance the feasibility and utilization of superconductors in various technological applications.
Encouragingly, some non-hydrogen clathrates, in particular the sp3 bonded ones with light elements, have been suggested to be superconducting at moderate or even ambient pressure. Many doped albite structures, such as XC6[14–15], X(BN)6[16], XB3C3[17], and XB3Si3[18], where X represents different doping elements, as well as FC34[19], has been predicted to be good superconductors at ambient pressure. For example, Tc calculated for NaC6 is 116–127 K at ambient pressure. It is noteworthy that with the guiding from particle-swarm structure prediction method, Zhu et al.[17] successfully synthesized a thermodynamically stable carbon-boron sp3 bonded clathrate at high pressures near 50 GPa, namely SrB3C3. The calculations further suggested that SrB3C3 is a superconductor, with the superconducting transition temperature of 40 K[20–22]. Carbon and silicon are elements of group-14 in the periodic table of elements[23]. They have four valence electrons, allowing them to form covalent bonds with other elements by sharing electrons. Moreover, they have certain similarities in atomic structure and chemical properties[24–25]. In the silicon analogues, RbB3Si3 is theoretically proposed to be thermodynamically stable between 7 and 35 GPa, and to be metastable at 1 atmospheric pressure, with Tc estimated to be 14 K[18]. Therefore, it is of great interest to explore whether the RbBSi compounds have the potential for superconductivity under ambient pressures.
In this work, we employed CALYPSO (crystal structure analysis by particle swarm optimization) method to predict the stable structure of RbBSi within the pressure range from zero to 100 GPa, and studied their physical properties by first-principles calculations.
We explored the properties of RbBSi in the pressure range of 0−100 GPa using CALYPSO code[26–29], which has been developed specifically to explore the potential energy surfaces of chemical systems and find the global minima. The structural relaxations and electronic properties were calculated using density functional theory with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation as implemented in the VASP code[30–31]. We used projector augmented wave (PAW) potentials[32] in which the valence electrons for the Rb, B and Si atoms were represented as 4s24p65s1, 2s22p1, and 3s23p2. In order to ensure the enthalpy convergence, the cutoff energy was adopted 500 eV. The Monkhorst-Pack k-point meshes are 8×8×2 for P63/mmc-RbBSi, 3×8×2 for C2/m-RbBSi, and 8×8×3 for P4/nmm-RbBSi, respectively. The phonon dispersion curves were used to verify the dynamic stability of RbBSi via a supercell approach as implemented in PHONOPY package[33]. The electron-phonon coupling constant was obtained from first-principles density-functional perturbation theory as implemented in QUANTUM ESPRESSO package[34].
The RbBSi crystal structure prediction was successfully conducted in the pressure range of 0-100 GPa, and three phases (P63/mmc, C2/m and P4/nmm) were discovered. As shown in Fig. 1(a), P63/mmc-RbBSi at standard atmospheric pressure has a layered hexagonal structure that consists of alternate B-Si honeycomb layers separated by a layer of interstitial Rb atoms. The bond length between boron and silicon is 2.049 Å, forming a stable hexagonal structure. In the pressure range of 17 GPa to 33 GPa, the C2/m phase was found to be more stable (see Fig. 1(b)). In the C2/m-RbBSi structure, there are six membered rings and four membered rings composed of folded B-Si layers. The layers in these structures are separated by Rb atoms in the gap between the two layers. The lengthes of the boron-silicon bond in the four-membered ring and in the six-membered ring are 2.095 and 2.115 Å, respectively, and the length of the boron-boron bond is 1.678 Å. As the pressure increases, the P4/nmm-RbBSi phase becomes more stable above 33 GPa (see Fig. 1(c)). Different from C2/m-RbBSi, the space group of P4/nmm-RbBSi changes from monoclinic to tetragonal, and the folded B-Si layer for P4/nmm-RbBSi is only composed of four-membered rings. The bond length of the boron-silicon bond is 2.098 Å. The detailed lattice parameters and atomic positions of the structures are given in Table 1.
Space group | Lattice parameters | Atomic positions |
P63/mmc | a = b = 3.549 Å,c = 11.365 Å α = β = 90°,γ = 120° |
Rb 2a (0, 0, 0) B 2d (0.667, 0.333, 0.250) Si 2c (0.667, 0.333, 0.750) |
C2/m | a = 9.004 Å,b = 3.518 Å,c = 11.226 Å α = γ = 90°,β = 109.3642° |
Rb 4i (0.532, 0, 0.770) B 4i (0.903, 0, 0.489) Si 4i (0.770, 0.500, 0.424) |
P4/nmm | a = b = 3.752 Å,c = 11.170 Å α = β = γ = 90° |
Rb 8j (0, 0.500, 0.736) B 8j (0, 0.500, 0.084) Si 4d (0.500, 0.500, 0) |
We also calculated the formation enthalpy (see Fig. 2), and systematically studied the stability of the three phases of RbBSi compounds. The formation enthalpy for RbBSi were defined as: ΔH = H(RbBSi) − H(Rb) − H(B) − H(Si). For Rb, we used the enthalpy from bcc → fcc → I41/amd → Cmca structure transitions, with the phase transitions occurring at 8.2, 15.1 and 41.0 GPa, respectively[35]. For B, we used the enthalpy from
The phonon calculation is a reliable measure to confirm the dynamic stability of studied materials. Therefore, we calculated phonon dispersion curves for P63/mmc at 0 and 10 GPa, for C2/m at 0 and 20 GPa, and for P4/nmm at 0 and 40 GPa, as shown in Fig. 3. Our phonon calculations showed that all the three phases are dynamically stable because of the absence of any imaginary frequency vibrations in the whole Brillouin zone.
We next explored the electronic properties of the predicted RbBSi compounds via electronic band structures and densities of electronic states (DOS). As shown in Fig. 4, it can be observed that there is a significant consistency between the band structures and DOS. As shown in Fig. 4(a)−Fig.4(c), the bands cross over the Fermi level, indicating that these phases are metallic, which agrees well with the results of DOS (see Fig. 4(d)−Fig. 4(f)). In addition, the major contribution of metallicity comes from the B-p state and the Si-p state.
Turning to the phonon and electron-phonon coupling in P4/nmm-RbBSi, the calculated phonon dispersion results are shown in Fig. 5. No imaginary phonon modes are present in the entire Brillouin zone, indicating the dynamic stability of this crystal structure. We then computed the Eliashberg spectral function α2F(ω), where α represents the electron-phonon interaction strength and ω represents the frequency. The overall isotropic electron-phonon coupling parameter λ can be obtained via a simple integration in the frequency domain. λ is 0.84, which is quite large for phonon-mediated superconductors. These calculations suggest that P4/nmm-RbBSi is a superconductor with Tc of 14.4 K at standard atmospheric pressures. The superconducting transition temperature is reduced to 0 K at 40 GPa.
In addition, it was found that P63/mmc-RbBSi also exhibits superconducting properties, and the superconducting transition temperature under standard atmospheric pressure is 5.2 K. Its λ is 0.50. However, its superconducting transition temperature is reduced to 3.3 K at 10 GPa, and the corresponding λ is 0.44.
In summary, we have extensively explored the RbBSi within the pressure range of 0−100 GPa using CALYPSO method. It is found that RbBSi has three thermodynamically stable phases, denoted as P63/mmc-, C2/m-, P4/nmm-RbBSi. All the phases studied are dynamically stable in the pressure ranges of 0−10 GPa, 0−20 GPa and 0−40 GPa, respectively. Based on our calculations of formation enthalpy and density of electronic states, it is shown that these structures exhibit metallic properties. Electron-phonon calculations predicted that P4/nmm-RbBSi would be a superconductor with Tc of 14.4 K at standard atmospheric pressures. Our current findings predict a superconductor with synthetic potential, which provides a driving force for further research and development of superconducting materials.
[1] |
LARBALESTIER D, CANFIELD P C. Superconductivity at 100—where we’ve been and where we’re going [J]. MRS Bulletin, 2011, 36(8): 590–593. doi: 10.1557/mrs.2011.174
|
[2] |
ANLAGE S M. The physics and applications of superconducting metamaterials [J]. Journal of Optics, 2011, 13(2): 024001. doi: 10.1088/2040-8978/13/2/024001
|
[3] |
HASSENZAHL W V, HAZELTON D W, JOHNSON B K, et al. Electric power applications of superconductivity [J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2004, 92(10): 1655–1674. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2004.833674
|
[4] |
GREENBERG Y S. Application of superconducting quantum interference devices to nuclear magnetic resonance [J]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 1998, 70(1): 175–222. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.175
|
[5] |
MA L, WANG K, XIE Y, et al. High-temperature superconducting phase in clathrate calcium hydride CaH6 up to 215 K at a pressure of 172 GPa [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2022, 128(16): 167001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.167001
|
[6] |
JEON H, WANG C Z, LIU S Y, et al. Electron-phonon coupling and superconductivity in an alkaline earth hydride CaH6 at high pressures [J]. New Journal of Physics, 2022, 24(8): 083048. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/ac8a0c
|
[7] |
QIAN S F, SHENG X W, YAN X Z, et al. Theoretical study of stability and superconductivity of ScH n ( n=4–8) at high pressure [J]. Physical Review B, 2017, 96(9): 094513. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094513
|
[8] |
TROYAN I A, SEMENOK D V, KVASHNIN A G, et al. Anomalous high-temperature superconductivity in YH6 [J]. Advanced Materials, 2021, 33(15): 2006832. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006832
|
[9] |
MA L, WANG K, XIE Y, et al. High-Tc superconductivity in clathrate calcium hydride CaH6 [EB/OL]. arXiv: 2103.16282, (2021-11-04)[2023-10-24]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.16282.
|
[10] |
WANG H, TSE J S, TANAKA K, et al. Superconductive sodalite-like clathrate calcium hydride at high pressures [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(17): 6463–6466.
|
[11] |
DROZDOV A P, KONG P P, MINKOV V S, et al. Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures [J]. Nature, 2019, 569(7757): 528–531. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1201-8
|
[12] |
SOMAYAZULU M, AHART M, MISHRA A K, et al. Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2019, 122(2): 027001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.027001
|
[13] |
LIU H Y, NAUMOV I I, GEBALLE Z M, et al. Dynamics and superconductivity in compressed lanthanum superhydride [J]. Physical Review B, 2018, 98(10): 100102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.100102
|
[14] |
LU S Y, LIU H Y, NAUMOV I I, et al. Superconductivity in dense carbon-based materials [J]. Physical Review B, 2016, 93(10): 104509. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.104509
|
[15] |
SANO K, MASUDA Y, ITO H. Superconductivity of carbon compounds with sodalite structure [J]. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 2022, 91(8): 083703. doi: 10.7566/JPSJ.91.083703
|
[16] |
LI X, YONG X, WU M, et al. Hard BN clathrate superconductors [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2019, 10(10): 2554–2560. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00619
|
[17] |
ZHU L, STROBEL T A, COHEN R E. Prediction of an extended ferroelectric clathrate [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2020, 125(12): 127601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.127601
|
[18] |
CUI X Y, HILLEKE K P, WANG X Y, et al. RbB3Si3: an alkali metal borosilicide that is metastable and superconducting at 1 atm [J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020, 124(27): 14826–14831. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04617
|
[19] |
ZIPOLI F, BERNASCONI M, BENEDEK G. Electron-phonon coupling in halogen-doped carbon clathrates from first principles [J]. Physical Review B, 2006, 74(20): 205408. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.205408
|
[20] |
ZHU L, BORSTAD G M, LIU H Y, et al. Carbon-boron clathrates as a new class of sp3-bonded framework materials [J]. Science Advances, 2020, 6(2): eaay8361. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aay8361
|
[21] |
ZHANG P Y, LI X, YANG X, et al. Path to high- Tc superconductivity via Rb substitution of guest metal atoms in the SrB3C3 clathrate [J]. Physical Review B, 2022, 105(9): 094503. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.094503
|
[22] |
WANG J N, YAN X W, GAO M. High-temperature superconductivity in SrB3C3 and BaB3C3 predicted from first-principles anisotropic Migdal-Eliashberg theory [J]. Physical Review B, 2021, 103(14): 144515. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.144515
|
[23] |
KIEFER F, KARTTUNEN A J, DÖBLINGER M, et al. Bulk synthesis and structure of a microcrystalline allotrope of germanium ( m- allo-Ge) [J]. Chemistry of Materials, 2011, 23(20): 4578–4586. doi: 10.1021/cm201976x
|
[24] |
ZHANG H J, REN J D, WU L L, et al. Predicted semiconductor to metal transition from LiBSi2 to RbBSi2 by first-principles calculations [J]. Computational Materials Science, 2016, 124: 267–272. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.08.002
|
[25] |
KARTTUNEN A J, FÄSSLER T F, LINNOLAHTI M, et al. Structural principles of semiconducting group 14 clathrate frameworks [J]. Inorganic Chemistry, 2011, 50(5): 1733–1742. doi: 10.1021/ic102178d
|
[26] |
YAN H Y, CHEN L, WEI Z T, et al. Superhard high-pressure structures of beryllium diborocarbides [J]. Vacuum, 2020, 180: 109617. doi: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2020.109617
|
[27] |
LAZICKI A, YOO C S, CYNN H, et al. Search for superconductivity in LiBC at high pressure: diamond anvil cell experiments and first-principles calculations [J]. Physical Review B, 2007, 75(5): 054507. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.054507
|
[28] |
WANG Y C, LV J, ZHU L, et al. Crystal structure prediction via particle-swarm optimization [J]. Physical Review B, 2010, 82(9): 094116. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.094116
|
[29] |
WANG Y C, LV J, ZHU L, et al. CALYPSO: a method for crystal structure prediction [J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2012, 183(10): 2063–2070. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.008
|
[30] |
KRESSE G, FURTHMÜLLER J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set [J]. Physical Review B, 1996, 54(16): 11169–11186. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
|
[31] |
PERDEW J P, CHEVARY J A, VOSKO S H, et al. Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation [J]. Physical Review B, 1992, 46(11): 6671–6687. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6671
|
[32] |
KRESSE G, JOUBERT D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method [J]. Physical Review B, 1999, 59(3): 1758–1775. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
|
[33] |
TOGO A, OBA F, TANAKA I. First-principles calculations of the ferroelastic transition between rutile-type and CaCl2-type SiO2 at high pressures [J]. Physical Review B, 2008, 78(13): 134106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.134106
|
[34] |
GIANNOZZI P, BARONI S, BONINI N, et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials [J]. Journal of Physics:Condensed Matter, 2009, 21(39): 395502. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502
|
[35] |
DEGTYAREVA O. Crystal structure of simple metals at high pressures [J]. High Pressure Research, 2010, 30(3): 343–371. doi: 10.1080/08957959.2010.508877
|
[36] |
OGANOV A R, SOLOZHENKO V L, GATTI C, et al. The high-pressure phase of boron, γ-B28: disputes and conclusions of 5 years after discovery [J]. Journal of Superhard Materials, 2011, 33(6): 363–379. doi: 10.3103/S1063457612060019
|
[37] |
CUI X Y, ZHANG M, GAO L L. Exploration of AB3Si3 (A=Na/K/Rb/Cs) compounds under moderate pressure [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2023, 25(35): 23847–23854. doi: 10.1039/D3CP02930A
|
[1] | LIU Yushi, ZHANG Long, LI Wenguang, LIU Qijun, LIU Zhengtang, LIU Fusheng. First-Principles Investigation of the High-Pressure Phase Transition in Representative Alkali Metal Halides[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2025, 39(2): 022201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20240864 |
[2] | HE Yu, SUN Shichuan, LI Heping. Superionic Iron Alloys in Earth’s Inner Core and Their Effects[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2024, 38(3): 030202. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20240707 |
[3] | ZHU Zhikai, LI Zhongyang, KONG Lingping, LIU Gang. Recent Progress on Structural and Functional Evolutions of Metal Halide Perovskites under High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2024, 38(5): 050101. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230768 |
[4] | SONG Xianqi, LIU Chang, LIU Zikai, WANG Jianyun, LI Quan. Structural and Electronic Properties of Solid Hydrogen at Non-Hydrostatic Pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2023, 37(5): 050102. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230720 |
[5] | TIAN Yifan, LIU Hanyu. Progress on Compounds of Inert Element Helium under High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2023, 37(3): 030101. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230635 |
[6] | MIAO Yu, LIU Siyuan, MA Xuejiao, JIN Zhexue. Theoretical Simulation and Physical Properties of MgN8 Crystal Structure under High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2020, 34(1): 011102. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190818 |
[7] | YANG Longxing, LIU Lei, LIU Hong, YI Li, GU Xiaoyu. Structure and Elasticity of Garnet under High Pressure by First-Principles Simulation[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(6): 060104. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190785 |
[8] | QIN Rui. New Developments of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory and Its Applications[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(3): 030101. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190747 |
[9] | LI Xin, MA Xuejiao, GAO Wenquan, LIU Yanhui. Evolution of Crystal Structures and Electronic Properties for Ir2P under High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(1): 011103. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180645 |
[10] | LIU Siyuan, MIAO Yu, MA Xuejiao, LI Xin, GAO Wenquan, CHENG Yuheng, LIU Yanhui. Pressure-Induced Phase Transformations of IrSb from First-Principles Calculations[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(5): 052203. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190716 |
[11] | LIU Ke-Wei, YU Jie, ZHOU Xiao-Long, HU Ming-Yu, ZHAN Jian-Xiang. Rutile and CaCl2 Structure of SnO2 Phase Transition under High-Pressure Studied by First-Principles Method[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2017, 31(1): 81-88. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2017.01.012 |
[12] | ZHOU Hong-Yu, LIU Jie. High-Pressure Induced Quenching of Polaron in the Emeraldine-Base Polymer[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2015, 29(1): 75-80. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2015.01.013 |
[13] | YUAN Zhen, ZHANG Shao-Peng, JIN Chang-Qing, WANG Xiao-Hui. Raman Spectroscopy Studies of Nanocrystalline Lead Zirconate Titanate as Functions of High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2015, 29(2): 95-98. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2015.02.002 |
[14] | WANG Zhang-Cun, CUI Sheng-Wen, LUO Shuang-Qun, ZHAO Xue-Wei, ZHENG Jian-Qiang, LI Chang-Wen, YUAN Dao-Qiang. Effect of High Pressure-Enzymolysis on Solubility and Structural Characteristic of Rice Protein[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(6): 736-742. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.06.015 |
[15] | REN Xiao-Guang, CUI Xue-Han, WU Bao-Jia, GU Guang-Rui. Electronic Structure and Lattice Dynamics of Intermetallic Compounds CaAlSi at High-Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(2): 161-167. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.02.005 |
[16] | YANG Xiao-Cui, ZHAO Yan-Hui, LUO Xiang-Yi, XIAO Jun-Ping. First-Principles Calculations of Pressure-Induced Phase Transition of Lanthanide Mononitrides[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(5): 545-550. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.05.006 |
[17] | YANG Xiao-Cui, ZHAO Yu-Wei, GAO Zhong-Ming, LIU Xin, ZHANG Li-Xin, WANG Xiao-Ming, HAO Ai-Min. First-Principles Study of Structural Stabilities, Electronic and Optical Properties of CaF2 under High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2010, 24(3): 225-230 . doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2010.03.011 |
[18] | GAO Ling-Ling, MA Yan-Mei, LIU Dan, HAO Jian, JIN Yun-Xia, WANG Feng, WANG Qiu-Shi, ZOU Guang-Tian, CUI Qi-Liang. Raman Spectra Characterization of Cycloheptane under High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2008, 22(2): 192-196 . doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2008.02.013 |
[19] | LIU Xiao-Mei, LIANG Yong-Cheng, SONG Qiu-Hong. Mechanical Properties of Transition-Metal Osmium under High Pressure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2008, 22(3): 253-258 . doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2008.03.005 |
[20] | ZHAO Yong-Nian, LIU Zhen-Xian, CUI Qi-Liang, XU Yi-Qiu, FAN Yu-Guo, ZOU Guang-Tian. Studies of Raman Spectra for MnF2 at High-Pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 1990, 4(1): 1-6 . doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.1990.01.001 |
Space group | Lattice parameters | Atomic positions |
P63/mmc | a = b = 3.549 Å,c = 11.365 Å α = β = 90°,γ = 120° |
Rb 2a (0, 0, 0) B 2d (0.667, 0.333, 0.250) Si 2c (0.667, 0.333, 0.750) |
C2/m | a = 9.004 Å,b = 3.518 Å,c = 11.226 Å α = γ = 90°,β = 109.3642° |
Rb 4i (0.532, 0, 0.770) B 4i (0.903, 0, 0.489) Si 4i (0.770, 0.500, 0.424) |
P4/nmm | a = b = 3.752 Å,c = 11.170 Å α = β = γ = 90° |
Rb 8j (0, 0.500, 0.736) B 8j (0, 0.500, 0.084) Si 4d (0.500, 0.500, 0) |