Bubble Curtain Clipping Characteristics Based on Orthogonal Test Method

DU Mingran; CHEN Yuhang; LU Shaofeng; LIANG Jin; LI Jirui; WANG Yinjun; WANG Tianzhao; CHEN Zhifan

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20230684

Volume 37 Issue 6

Dec 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics > 2023 > 37(6): 065302.

LI Xiang, LIU Qing-Qing, FENG Shao-Min, ZHU Jin-Long, CHEN Liang-Chen, JIN Chang-Qing. The Six over Eight Type Double Stage Large Volume High Pressure and High Temperature Facilities and Their Applications to New Materials Syntheses[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2013, 27(2): 223-229. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.02.009

Citation:

DU Mingran, CHEN Yuhang, LU Shaofeng, LIANG Jin, LI Jirui, WANG Yinjun, WANG Tianzhao, CHEN Zhifan. Bubble Curtain Clipping Characteristics Based on Orthogonal Test Method[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2023, 37(6): 065302. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230684

Citation:

PDF( 2422 KB)

Bubble Curtain Clipping Characteristics Based on Orthogonal Test Method

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230684

DU Mingran^{1, 2
,},
CHEN Yuhang¹,
LU Shaofeng^{2, 3},
LIANG Jin^{2, 3},
LI Jirui^{2, 3},
WANG Yinjun⁴,
WANG Tianzhao¹,
CHEN Zhifan¹

1.
School of Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, Anhui, China
2.
Research Institution of Underwater Rock-Cutting Engineering at Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530200, Guangxi, China
3.
Guangxi New Harbor Engineering Co., Ltd., Nanning 530200, Guangxi, China
4.
BGRIMM Technology Group, Beijing 100160, China

Received Date: 20 Jun 2023
Rev Recd Date: 03 Jul 2023

Available Online: 26 Nov 2023

Issue Publish Date: 15 Dec 2023

Abstract

Abstract

There are many influencing factors of bubble curtain clipping technology. In order to obtain the optimal combination of bubble curtain in engineering applications, AUTODYN software was used to design a three factor and three level orthogonal test. The average reduction rate of shock wave peak pressure was used as an evaluation index to study the influence and sensitivity of the number of bubble curtain layers, the burst distance of the bubble curtain and the charge depth on the bubble curtain clipping effect. The results indicate that the clipping ability of the bubble curtain has a great value, and there will be a negative effect if the number of bubble curtain layers continues to increase. The number of bubble curtain layers has the greatest effect on the clipping ability, followed by the charge depth, and the effect of bubble curtain explosion center distance is the smallest. The smaller the burst center distance and the greater the depth of the packet, the better the bubble curtain chipping effect. When the number of bubble curtain layers is 2, the bubble curtain burst distance is 1 m, and the charge depth is 10.5 m, the clipping effect is the best.
- underwater explosion,
- bubble curtain,
- orthogonal test,
- peak pressure,
- sensitivity

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	高明涛, 李昕, 周晶. 水下钻孔爆破水中冲击波的数值模拟研究 [J]. 水电能源科学, 2009, 27(4): 138–141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7709.2009.04.043 GAO M T, LI X, ZHOU J. Numerical simulation of shock wave in water of underwater drilling blasting [J]. Water Resources and Power, 2009, 27(4): 138–141. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7709.2009.04.043
[2]	杨建, 刘静, 张登泰, 等. 气泡帷幕对港口水域爆破波的削弱 [J]. 中国水运, 2020, 20(10): 90–92. YANG J, LIU J, ZHANG D T, et al. Weakening of blast waves in port waters by air bubble curtains [J]. China Water Transport, 2020, 20(10): 90–92.
[3]	司剑峰. 深水钻孔爆破的冲击波衰减规律及防护研究 [D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2021. SI J F. Research on attenuation law of shock wave and protection in deep-water drilling and blasting [D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2021.
[4]	俞统昌, 王晓峰, 王建灵. 炸药的水下爆炸冲击波性能 [J]. 含能材料, 2003, 11(4): 182–186. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2003.04.002 YU T C, WANG X F, WANG J L. Underwater shockwave performance of explosives [J]. Energetic Materials, 2003, 11(4): 182–186. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2003.04.002
[5]	伍俊, 杨益, 庄铁栓. 水中爆炸作用机理及毁伤效应研究综述 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2016, 39(1): 1–13. doi: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2016.01.001 WU J, YANG Y, ZHUANG T S. A review of research on action mechanism and damage effect of underwater explosion [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2016, 39(1): 1–13. doi: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2016.01.001
[6]	陈岩武, 孙远翔, 王成. 水下爆炸载荷下舰船双层底部结构的毁伤特性 [J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(3): 670–681. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0390 CHEN Y W, SUN Y X, WANG C. Damage characteristics of ship’s double bottom structure subjected to underwater explosion [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(3): 670–681. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2022.0390
[7]	赵为, 梁作民, 郭成喜. 水下近场爆破安全控制 [J]. 水运工程, 2007, 33(9): 159–164. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4972.2007.09.038 ZHAO W, LIANG Z M, GUO C X. Safety control of underwater near-site explosion [J]. Port & Waterway Engineering, 2007, 33(9): 159–164. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4972.2007.09.038
[8]	张轶凡, 刘亮涛, 王金相, 等. 水下爆炸冲击波和气泡载荷对典型圆柱壳结构的毁伤特性 [J]. 兵工学报, 2023, 44(2): 345–359. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0598 ZHANG Y F, LIU L T, WANG J X, et al. Damage characteristics of underwater explosion shock wave and bubble load on typical cylindrical shell structure [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2023, 44(2): 345–359. doi: 10.12382/bgxb.2021.0598
[9]	王高辉, 高政, 卢文波, 等. 考虑初始应力的混凝土重力坝水下爆炸毁伤特性研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(11): 133–140. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.11.017 WANG G H, GAO Z, LU W B, et al. Damage characteristics of underwater explosion of concrete gravity dam considering initial stress [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(11): 133–140. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.11.017
[10]	张志波, 李春军, 李红勇, 等. 气泡帷幕在水下爆破减震工程中的应用 [J]. 爆破, 2003, 20(2): 75–76, 89. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2003.02.028 ZHANG Z B, LI C J, LI H Y, et al. Application of air bubble purdah in the damping measure in the underwater blasting [J]. Blasting, 2003, 20(2): 75–76, 89. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2003.02.028
[11]	刘欣, 顾文彬, 陈学平. 气泡帷幕对水中冲击波衰减特性的数值模拟研究 [J]. 爆破, 2015, 32(3): 79–84. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2015.03.014 LIU X, GU W B, CHEN X P. Numerical simulation study of attenuation characteristics of water shock wave under bubble curtain [J]. Blasting, 2015, 32(3): 79–84. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2015.03.014
[12]	胡伟才, 吴立, 舒利, 等. 不同设置方式下气泡帷幕对水中冲击波衰减特性的影响 [J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018, 18(17): 33–38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.17.006 HU W C, WU L, SHU L, et al. Influence of water shock wave on attenuation characteristics under bubble curtain with different settings [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2018, 18(17): 33–38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.17.006
[13]	李泽华, 白春华, 刘庆明, 等. 气泡帷幕减弱水中冲击波强度的研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 1999, 10(5): 72–76. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.1999.05.015 LI Z H, BAI C H, LIU Q M, et al. Study on weakening the shock wave in water by bubble heavy curtain [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 1999, 10(5): 72–76. doi: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.1999.05.015
[14]	谢达建, 吴立, 洪江, 等. 气泡帷幕对水下爆破冲击波的削弱作用研究 [J]. 人民长江, 2018, 49(8): 72–77. doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2018.08.014 XIE D J, WU L, HONG J, et al. Study on weakening effect of bubble curtain on water shock wave in underwater blasting [J]. Yangtze River, 2018, 49(8): 72–77. doi: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2018.08.014
[15]	陆少锋, 梁进, 覃才勇, 等. 供风量对水下爆炸冲击波气泡帷幕消波效应的影响 [J]. 工程爆破, 2022, 28(5): 143–148. doi: 10.19931/j.EB.20210013 LU S F, LIANG J, QIN C Y, et al. Influence of air supply rate on wave attenuation effect of bubble curtain for underwater explosion shock wave [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2022, 28(5): 143–148. doi: 10.19931/j.EB.20210013
[16]	胡亮亮, 黄瑞源, 李世超, 等. 水下爆炸冲击波数值仿真研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2020, 34(1): 015102. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190773 HU L L, HUANG R Y, LI S C, et al. Shock wave simulation of underwater explosion [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2020, 34(1): 015102. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190773
[17]	刘世聪, 王秋生, 娄浩然. 装药深度及空气域尺寸对水下爆炸的影响分析 [J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2019, 27(6): 664–672. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2019.06.010 LIU S C, WANG Q S, LOU H R. Effects of charge depth and air domain size on underwater explosion [J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2019, 27(6): 664–672. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2019.06.010
[18]	黄洪, 卢熹, 王健. 柱形装药水下爆炸近场冲击波数值仿真 [J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2021, 29(4): 471–476. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2021.04.015 HUANG H, LU X, WANG J. Near field shock wave numerical simulation of cylindrical charge underwater explosion [J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2021, 29(4): 471–476. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2021.04.015
[19]	鲁天龙. 气泡帷幕周围流场运动特性数值模拟研究 [D]. 长沙: 长沙理工大学, 2020. LU T L. Numerical simulation of flow field motion characteristics around bubble curtain [D]. Changsha: Changsha University of Technology, 2020.
[20]	王思, 胡晶, 张雪东, 等. 不同水深水下爆炸数值及离心试验研究 [J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2020, 52(6): 78–84. doi: 10.11918/202001082 WANG S, HU J, ZHANG X D, et al. Numerical analysis and centrifugal test of underwater explosion effect at different water depths [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020, 52(6): 78–84. doi: 10.11918/202001082
[21]	盛振新, 刘荣忠, 郭锐. 壳体厚度和爆炸深度对水下爆炸冲击波的影响 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2011, 34(3): 45–47, 64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2011.03.012 SHENG Z X, LIU R Z, GUO R. Effect of shell thickness and explosion depth on underwater explosive shock wave [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2011, 34(3): 45–47, 64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2011.03.012
[22]	陈兴, 周兰伟, 李福明, 等. 爆炸深度对装药水下载荷的影响 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2021, 42(8): 79–84. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2021.08.013 CHEN X, ZHOU L W, LI F M, et al. Research on influence of depth of charge on underwater explosion load [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2021, 42(8): 79–84. doi: 10.11809/bqzbgcxb2021.08.013
[23]	尹岳降, 李瑞泽, 陈明, 等. 基于正交试验法的爆破块度分布影响因素敏感性分析 [J]. 爆破, 2019, 36(4): 37–42. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2019.04.005 YIN Y J, LI R Z, CHEN M, et al. Sensitivity analysis of influencing factors of blasting fragmentation distribution based on orthogonal experiment method [J]. Blasting, 2019, 36(4): 37–42. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2019.04.005
[24]	张世豪, 韩晶, 焦国太, 等. 单个装药混凝土爆破毁伤效果敏感性分析 [J]. 工程爆破, 2014, 20(3): 5–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2014.03.002 ZHANG S H, HAN J, JIAO G T, et al. Sensitivity analysis of blasting damage effect in concrete based on single charge [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2014, 20(3): 5–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2014.03.002
[25]	史秀志, 王怀勇, 刘金明, 等. 基于粗糙集的影响爆破振动特征参量因素的敏感性分析 [J]. 爆破器材, 2009, 38(2): 1–4, 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2009.02.001. SHI X Z, WANG H Y, LIU J M, et al. Sensitivity analysis of the factors impact of blasting vibration characteristic parameters based on rough set theory [J]. Explosive Materials, 2009, 38(2): 1–4, 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2009.02.001.
[26]	胡玉林, 姜俊杰, 罗健琛, 等. 基于多因素方差分析探究灌水施肥量对番茄产量的影响 [J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(5): 1042–1045. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230126 HU Y L, JIANG J J, LUO J C, et al. Exploring the effect of irrigation and fertilizer application on tomato yield based on multi-factor analysis of variance [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(5): 1042–1045. doi: 10.16178/j.issn.0528-9017.20230126
[27]	刘世涛, 郝兵元, 杨冉, 等. 基于方差分析法坚硬顶板下矿压显现分析 [J]. 煤炭技术, 2022, 41(7): 20–23. doi: 10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2022.07.005 LIU S T, HAO B Y, YANG R, et al. Analysis of mineral pressure under rigid top plate based on variance analysis [J]. Coal Technology, 2022, 41(7): 20–23. doi: 10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2022.07.005
[28]	王志建, 龙顺忠, 李颖宏. 基于正交试验的感应控制参数组合优化 [J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2023, 57(6): 1128–1136. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2023.06.008 WANG Z J, LONG S Z, LI Y H. Combination optimization of induction control parameters based on orthogonal test [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2023, 57(6): 1128–1136. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2023.06.008

Relative Articles

[1]	CUI Niansheng, WEI Jianlin, YUAN Zengsen, XU Zhenyang, LIU Xin, WANG Xuesong. Simulation Analysis of Mesoscale Characteristics in the Dynamic Fracture Damage of Heterogeneous Rock[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2023, 37(4): 044204. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230638
[2]	XU Lizhi, HAN Zhiyuan, ZHOU Feng, PANG Shiming, DU Zhonghua, GAO Guangfa. Similar Analysis of PELE Penetrating Metal Target Fragmentation Effect[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2023, 37(1): 015103. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20220662
[3]	GU Xiaoyu, LIU Lei. First-Principles Calculation on Crystal Structure and Elastic Properties of Py-FeO₂, Py-FeOOH and ε-FeOOH under High Pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2022, 36(1): 012201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210789
[4]	ZHANG Yanze, QIN Jian, MENG Xiangyao, LIU Yuankai, WEN Yanbo, HUANG Ruiyuan. Flow Stress Characteristics and Constitutive Model of ZL101A Aluminum Alloy under High Temperature and High Strain Rate[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2022, 36(3): 034105. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210923
[5]	MA Sizhou, LIU Kewei, GUO Tengfei, HUANG Xiaohui, ZHOU Zhanxing. Numerical Analysis of Dynamic Mechanical Characteristics of Brazilian Splitting of Coal-Rock Combination Bodies[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2022, 36(5): 054204. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20220589
[6]	WU Xiao, MA Yangyang, YANG Shu, HE Kaihua, JI Guangfu. First Principles Study of Lattice Thermal Conductivity and Sound Velocity Characteristics of FeO₂ and FeO₂He[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2021, 35(3): 032201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20200659
[7]	LU Zhenyu, LI Wenbin, YAO Wenjin, PENG Hang. Experimental Study on Compression and Fracture Characteristics of Two Kinds of Rocks under Different Strain Rates[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2021, 35(1): 014101. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20200605
[8]	WANG Tao, WANG Bing, LIN Jianyu, BAI Jingsong, LI Ping, ZHONG Min, TAO Gang. Computational Analysis of RM Instability with Inverse Chevron Interface[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(1): 012302. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180575
[9]	HAO Weijiang, LONG Renrong, ZHANG Qingming, CHEN Li, GONG Zizheng. Numerical Simulation Analysis of Back Fragmentation of Sphere by Hypervelocity Impact[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(2): 024102. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180651
[10]	JIANG Rongbao, HUANG Xilong, ZOU Liyong, SHI Honghui, WU Jun. Experimental Investigation on the Characteristics of Unstability at Liquid-Liquid Tilted Interface Induced by Rayleigh-Taylor Instability[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2018, 32(5): 054201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180512
[11]	ZHANG Hong-Ping, LUO Bin-Qiang, WANG Gui-Ji, WANG Gang-Hua. Inverse Characteristic Analysis of Ramp Loading Experiments[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2016, 30(2): 123-129. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.02.006
[12]	SHEN Zheng-Xiang, YUAN Shu-Qiang, CHEN Jiong, LIU Feng-Tao, ZHOU Chun-Hua, WANG Fang, YANG Hui. Fragmentation of Metal Cylindrical Shell Treated by Local Quenching[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2015, 29(4): 293-298. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2015.04.009
[13]	PANG Bao-Jun, ZHANG Kai, LIN Min, LIU Yuan. Characteristic Analysis of Acoustic Emission Signals Caused by Debris Cloud Impact[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(6): 664-670. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2014.06.004
[14]	WANG Zhang-Cun, TIAN Wei-Huan, CUI Sheng-Wen, ZHAO Xue-Wei, ZHENG Jian-Qiang, LI Chang-Wen, YUAN Dao-Qiang. Effects of High Hydrostatic Pressure on the Solubility and Molecular Structure of Rice Protein[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2013, 27(4): 609-615. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2013.04.023
[15]	WANG Xin-Zheng, ZHANG Song-Lin, ZHANG Qing-Ming, QIN Zhi-Gui, CHEN Min, LI Wen-Jie. Analysis of Reactive Hot Spot for Thermite under Shock Waves[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2012, 26(6): 665-673. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2012.06.011
[16]	QI Mei-Lan, LUO Chao, FAN Duan, HE Hong-Liang. Characteristics Analysis of Free-Surface Velocity Profiles of Ultra-Pure Aluminum[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2011, 25(6): 487-492. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2011.06.002
[17]	WANG Xin-Zheng, ZHANG Song-Lin, ZOU Guang-Ping. Numerical Analysis on Fragmentation Properties of the Steel Cylinder Subjected to Detonation of Internal Short Cylinderical Explosive Charge[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2010, 24(1): 61-66 . doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2010.01.011
[18]	XU Jin-Zhong, TANG Wen- Hui, XU Zhi-Hong. Numerical Analysis of the Characteristics of Debris Clouds Produced by Hypervelocity Impacts Using SPH Method[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2008, 22(4): 377-383 . doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2008.04.007
[19]	WEI Yu-Nian, SUN Ke, FENG Yuan-Bing, YAO Yu-Shu, LIU Shi-Chao, WANG Wen-Kui. Phase Decomposition of FexN Compounds under High Pressures[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 1992, 6(1): 75-80 . doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.1992.01.011
[20]	WANG Yi-Feng, SU Wen-Hui, QIAN Zheng-Nan, MA Xian-Feng, YAN Xue-Wei. A Study on the High Temperature-High Pressure Stability and the X-Ray Phase Analysis for Compounds R2Fe4/3W2/3O7 with Pyrochlore Structure[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 1988, 2(4): 296-304 . doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.1988.04.002

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(6) / Tables(9)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views(262) PDF downloads(28)

Bubble Curtain Clipping Characteristics Based on Orthogonal Test Method

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230684

Abstract

References

Relative Articles

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Bubble Curtain Clipping Characteristics Based on Orthogonal Test Method

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20230684

Abstract

References

Relative Articles

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content