Discrete Element Simulation of Blasting Damage Characteristics of Granite under Different Decoupling Coefficients

YUAN Zengsen; XU Zhenyang; PAN Bo; LI Guangshang

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20210804

Volume 36 Issue 1

Jan 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics > 2022 > 36(1): 015301.

YUAN Zengsen, XU Zhenyang, PAN Bo, LI Guangshang. Discrete Element Simulation of Blasting Damage Characteristics of Granite under Different Decoupling Coefficients[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2022, 36(1): 015301. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210804

Citation:

YUAN Zengsen, XU Zhenyang, PAN Bo, LI Guangshang. Discrete Element Simulation of Blasting Damage Characteristics of Granite under Different Decoupling Coefficients[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2022, 36(1): 015301. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210804

Citation:

PDF( 25397 KB)

Discrete Element Simulation of Blasting Damage Characteristics of Granite under Different Decoupling Coefficients

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210804

1.
School of Mining Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, Liaoning, China
2.
School of Civil and Resources Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 28 May 2021
Rev Recd Date: 23 Jun 2021

Abstract

Abstract

In order to study the effect of charge decoupling coefficients on the extent of granite blasting damage, a particle flow code (PFC) blasting simulation method with mixed “dynamic” and “quasi-static” loads is proposed based on the joint action of blast shock wave and detonation gas, and then the numerical simulation of granite blasting process under six decoupling coefficients was carried out. The results show that the extent of granite blasting damage increases and then decreases as the decoupling coefficients increases; the number of blasting induced cracks under coupled charge is 9367, which increases to 24975 when the decoupling coefficient is 1.2, and then decreases to 292 when the decoupling coefficient is 2.0. Comparing to the damage pattern under coupled charge, the extension distance of blasting induced crack is obviously shorter when the decoupling coefficient is 1.4, which indicates that the quasi-static pressure of blast gas plays an important role in crack extension. According to the number of blasting cracks, the prediction model of rock blasting damage under different decoupling coefficients greater than or equal to 1.2 was established, and the fitting degree reaches 0.9808. The prediction model presented in this paper is of certain reference significance for practical blasting design.
- granite,
- decoupling coefficient,
- explosion damage,
- crack,
- particle flow code

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	宗琦, 孟德君. 炮孔不同装药结构对爆破能量影响的理论探讨 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(4): 641–645. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2003.04.027 ZONG Q, MENG D J. Influence of different kinds of hole charging structue on explosion energy transmission [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(4): 641–645. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2003.04.027
[2]	岳中文, 胡晓冰, 陈志远, 等. 不耦合装药对炸药能量利用率影响的实验研究 [J]. 爆破, 2020, 37(3): 34–39. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2020.03.006 YUE Z W, HU X B, CHEN Z Y, et al. Experimental study of effect of uncoupled charge on energy utilization efficiency of explosives [J]. Blasting, 2020, 37(3): 34–39. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2020.03.006
[3]	WANG Y B. Study of the dynamic fracture effect using slotted cartridge decoupling charge blasting [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2017, 96: 34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.04.015
[4]	汪旭光. 爆破设计与施工 [M]. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2011. WANG X G. Blasting design and construction [M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2011.
[5]	叶志伟, 陈明, 李桐, 等. 小不耦合系数装药爆破孔壁压力峰值计算方法 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(6): 064901. doi: 10.11883/bzcyj-2020-0185 YE Z W, CHEN M, LI T, et al. A calculation method of the peak pressure on borehole wall for low decoupling coefficient charge blasting [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 064901. doi: 10.11883/bzcyj-2020-0185
[6]	徐颖, 孟益平, 程玉生. 装药不耦合系数对爆破裂纹控制的试验研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(12): 1843–1847. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2002.12.020 XU Y, MENG Y P, CHENG Y S. Study on control of blast crack by decoupling charge index [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(12): 1843–1847. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2002.12.020
[7]	费鸿禄, 李守巨, 何庆志. 光面爆破装药不偶合系数的计算 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1992, 12(3): 270–274. FEI H L, LI S J, HE Q Z. Determintion of decouple coefficient and analysis of decouple action in the smooth blasting [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1992, 12(3): 270–274.
[8]	杨仁树, 肖成龙, 李永亮, 等. 不耦合偏心装药结构爆破损伤破坏的分形研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(12): 129–134. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.12.017 YANG R S, XIAO C L, LI Y L, et al. A fractal study on blasting damage of an eccentric decouple charge structure [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(12): 129–134. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.12.017
[9]	YUAN W, WANG W, SU X B, et al. Numerical study of the impact mechanism of decoupling charge on blasting-enhanced permeability in low-permeability sandstones [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2018, 106: 300–310. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.04.029
[10]	杜俊林, 罗强, 宗琦. 空气不耦合装药爆破孔壁冲击压力分析 [J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2005, 25(3): 306–310. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9315.2005.03.009 DU J L, LUO Q, ZONG Q. Analysis on preliminary shock pressure on borehole of air-de-coupling charging [J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2005, 25(3): 306–310. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9315.2005.03.009
[11]	PARK D, JEON B, JEON S. A numerical study on the screening of blast-induced waves for reducing ground vibration [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2009, 42(3): 449–473. doi: 10.1007/s00603-008-0016-y
[12]	吴再海, 安龙, 齐兆军, 等. 基于LS-DYNA与PFC联合的岩体爆破数值模拟方法分析 [J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2021, 38(3): 609–614. doi: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.0133 WU Z H, AN L, QI Z J, et al. The numerical simulation method of rock mass blasting based on PFC combined with LS-DYNA [J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2021, 38(3): 609–614. doi: 10.13545/j.cnki.jmse.2020.0133
[13]	许彪. 基于PFC的岩石控制爆破技术研究 [D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2018. XU B. Research on controlled blasting technology of rock based on PFC [D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2018.
[14]	ZHAO J J, ZHANG Y, RANJITH P G. Numerical modelling of blast-induced fractures in coal masses under high in-situ stresses [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 225: 106749. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106749
[15]	孙宁新, 雷明锋, 张运良, 等. 软弱夹层对爆炸应力波传播过程的影响研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(16): 112–119, 147. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.16.016 SUN N X, LEI M F, ZHANG Y L, et al. A study on the influence of weak interlayer on the propagation process of explosion stress wave [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(16): 112–119, 147. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2020.16.016
[16]	张玉磊, 苏健军, 李芝绒, 等. TNT内爆炸准静态压力特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(6): 1429–1434. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0170 ZHANG Y L, SU J J, LI Z R, et al. Quasi-static pressure characteristic of TNT’s internal explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1429–1434. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0170
[17]	石崇, 张强, 王盛年. 颗粒流(PFC5.0)数值模拟技术及应用 [J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(Suppl 2): 36. SHI C, ZHANG Q, WANG S N. Numerical simulation technology and application with particle flow code (PFC 5.0) [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(Suppl 2): 36.
[18]	POTYONDY D O. Simulating stress corrosion with a bonded-particle model for rock [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2007, 44(5): 677–691. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2006.10.002
[19]	张学朋, 王刚, 蒋宇静, 等. 基于颗粒离散元模型的花岗岩压缩试验模拟研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(Suppl 1): 99–105. ZHANG X P, WANG G, JIANG Y J, et al. Simulation research on granite compression test based on particle discrete element model [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(Suppl 1): 99–105.
[20]	QIU J D, LI D Y, LI X B, et al. Numerical investigation on the stress evolution and failure behavior for deep roadway under blasting disturbance [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 137: 106278. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106278
[21]	孙闯, 敖云鹤, 张家鸣, 等. 花岗岩细观破裂特征及宏观尺度效应的颗粒流研究 [J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(9): 1687–1695. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202009013 SUN C, AO Y H, ZHANG J M, et al. Particle flow of meso-fracture characteristics and macro-scale effect of granites [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(9): 1687–1695. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202009013
[22]	李夕兵. 岩石动力学基础与应用 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 258–287. LI X B. Rock dynamics fundamentals and applications [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014: 258–287.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Figures(13) / Tables(3)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article Metrics

Article views(959) PDF downloads(52)

Discrete Element Simulation of Blasting Damage Characteristics of Granite under Different Decoupling Coefficients

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210804

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Discrete Element Simulation of Blasting Damage Characteristics of Granite under Different Decoupling Coefficients

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210804

Abstract

References

Proportional views

Catalog

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Article Metrics

Proportional views

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content