Volume 34 Issue 3
Jun 2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Zhengpeng, QU Yandong. Dynamic Response Analysis of Buried X70 Steel Pipe near Weld Zone under Blast Loads[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2020, 34(3): 034204. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190831
Citation: LI Zhengpeng, QU Yandong. Dynamic Response Analysis of Buried X70 Steel Pipe near Weld Zone under Blast Loads[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2020, 34(3): 034204. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190831

Dynamic Response Analysis of Buried X70 Steel Pipe near Weld Zone under Blast Loads

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190831
  • Received Date: 04 Sep 2019
  • Rev Recd Date: 19 Oct 2019
  • The influence of blasting seismic effect on buried pipes has been an important research hotspot in the field of engineering blasting. Taking two kinds of buried X70 steel pipes with Y-type welds (groove with 2 mm weld reinforcement and groove without weld reinforcement) as examples, the dynamic behaviors of buried X70 steel pipes near the weld zone under blast loads were studied numerically by the finite element software ANSYS/LS-DYNA. The blast loads are formed by detonating 4.473 kg TNT with different blast heights (60.0, 85.0 and 110.0 cm). The results show that when the blast height is 60.0 cm, the pipe with weld reinforcement is greatly affected by stress concentration and that it yields earlier than the pipe without weld reinforcement. When the blast heights are 60.0 cm and 85.0 cm, the ability of the pipe with weld reinforcement to resist deformation is significantly weaker than that of the pipe without weld reinforcement. The interaction between soil and pipe supports the explosion-back surface of the X70 pipe, which can effectively reduce the displacement of the explosion-back surface of the X70 pipe. Under the same conditions, the vibration resistance performance of the X70 pipe with weld reinforcement is weaker than that of pipe without weld reinforcement. Moreover, compared with the weld form, blast height plays an important role in the maximum vibration velocity of the X70 pipe near weld zone.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    董绍华, 韩忠晨, 刘刚. 管道系统完整性评估技术进展及应用对策 [J]. 油气储运, 2014, 33(2): 121–128.

    DONG S H, HAN Z C, LIU G. Advancement and application measures of pipeline integrity assessment technology [J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2014, 33(2): 121–128.
    [2]
    张震, 周传波, 路世伟, 等. 爆破振动作用下邻近埋地混凝土管道动力响应特性 [J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2017, 46(9): 79–84. doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201611089

    ZHANG Z, ZHOU C B, LU S W, et al. Dynamic response characteristic of adjacent buried concrete pipeline subjected to blasting vibration [J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017, 46(9): 79–84. doi: 10.11918/j.issn.0367-6234.201611089
    [3]
    钟冬望, 黄雄, 卢哲, 等. 爆破荷载作用下不同尺寸埋地钢管的动态响应实验研究 [J]. 科学技术与工程, 2018, 18(13): 219–223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.13.035

    ZHONG D W, HUANG X, LU Z, et al. Experimental study on dynamic response of buried steel tubes with different sizes under blasting loading [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2018, 18(13): 219–223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.13.035
    [4]
    都的箭, 马书广, 杨惊东. 埋地管道爆炸地冲击作用的试验研究 [J]. 工程爆破, 2006, 12(2): 19–23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2006.02.006

    DU D J, MA S G, YANG J D. Experimental study of dynamical stress of buried pipelines under explosion ground shock waves [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2006, 12(2): 19–23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2006.02.006
    [5]
    JI C, SONG K J, GAO F Y, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on the deformation and tearing of X70 pipelines subjected to localized blast loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 107: 156–168. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.03.010
    [6]
    QU Y D, LIU W L, GWARZO M, et al. Parametric study of anti-explosion performance of reinforced concrete T-shaped beam strengthened with steel plates [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 156(15): 692–707.
    [7]
    曲艳东, 刘万里, 翟诚, 等. 水下爆破破冰爆炸冲击波传播规律数值分析 [J]. 爆破, 2017, 34(2): 100–104. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2017.02.019

    QU Y D, LIU W L, ZHAI C, et al. Numerical simulation of propagation law of shock waves in process of breaking ice by underwater blasting [J]. Blasting, 2017, 34(2): 100–104. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2017.02.019
    [8]
    梁政, 张澜, 张杰. 地面爆炸载荷下埋地管道动力响应分析 [J]. 安全与环境学报, 2016, 16(3): 158–163.

    LIANG Z, ZHANG L, ZHANG J. Dynamic response analysis of the underground-buried pipeline under the ground-surface explosive load [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2016, 16(3): 158–163.
    [9]
    房冲. 内空和充水管道在爆炸冲击荷载下的数值模拟分析 [J]. 山西建筑, 2017, 43(11): 130–132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6825.2017.11.071

    FANG C. The numerical simulation analysis of inner air pipes and water-filled pipes on the basis of explosive blast [J]. Shanxi Architecture, 2017, 43(11): 130–132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6825.2017.11.071
    [10]
    余洋, 纪冲, 周游, 等. 侧向局部爆炸荷载下钢质方管的损伤破坏及影响因素研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2018, 37(15): 191–198.

    YU Y, JI C, ZHOU Y, et al. Damage and failure of steel square tubes under lateral local explosion loading and their influencing factors [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2018, 37(15): 191–198.
    [11]
    杨天冰, 郭瑞杰. X70管道环焊缝接头残余应力数值模拟 [J]. 电焊机, 2008, 38(11): 9–14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2303.2008.11.004

    YANG T B, GUO R J. Residual stress simulation of X70 pipeline girth welding joint [J]. Electric Welding Machine, 2008, 38(11): 9–14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2303.2008.11.004
    [12]
    曲艳东, 杨尚, 李思宇, 等. TNT炸药爆炸场中三波点的数值模拟 [J]. 工程爆破, 2019, 25(1): 1–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2019.01.001

    QU Y D, YANG S, LI S Y, et al. Numerical simulation of triple point in the explosion field of TNT explosive [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2019, 25(1): 1–6. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2019.01.001
    [13]
    李海超, 魏连雨, 常春伟. 黄土中爆炸挤密实验与数值模拟 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(2): 289–294. doi: 10.11883/byzcj-2016-0251

    LI H C, WEI L Y, CHANG C W. Experiment and numerical simulation of explosion compaction in loess [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 289–294. doi: 10.11883/byzcj-2016-0251
    [14]
    杨秀敏. 爆炸冲击现象数值模拟 [M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2010: 335–338.

    YANG X M. Numerical simulation for explosion and phenomena [M]. Hefei: China University of Science and Technology Press, 2010: 335–338.
    [15]
    倪玲英, 郎健, 陈良路. 爆炸载荷作用下海底管道动力响应数值模拟 [J]. 油气储运, 2018, 37(2): 222–227.

    NI L Y, LANG J, CHEN L L. Numerical simulation on the dynamic response of submarine pipelines under blast loading [J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2018, 37(2): 222–227.
    [16]
    姚安林, 赵师平, 么惠全, 等. 地下爆炸对埋地输气管道冲击响应的数值分析 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(4): 168–172. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2009.04.037

    YAO A L, ZHAO S P, YAO H Q, et al. Numerical simulation of response of underground explosion ground shock to buried gas pipeline [J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2009, 31(4): 168–172. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2009.04.037
    [17]
    蒋勇. 超低氢高韧性X70管线钢配套焊条CHE607GX的研制及应用 [D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2006: 5–46.

    JIANG Y. Study on ultra-low hydrogen high strength CHE607GX electrode for X70 pipeline [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2006: 5–46.
    [18]
    邓祎楠. X70管线钢液相扩散焊数值模拟 [D]. 北京: 北京石油化工学院, 2017: 11–66.

    DENG Y N. Numerical simulation of transient liquid phase welding of X70 pipeline steel [D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology, 2017: 11–66.
    [19]
    王福山, 孙杨, 杨鑫华. 基于Battelle结构应力法的对接接头应力集中系数回归分析 [J]. 焊接技术, 2019, 48(6): 76–80.

    WANG F S, SUN Y, YANG X H. Regression analysis of stress concentration coefficient of butt joint based on battelle structural stress method [J]. Welding Technology, 2019, 48(6): 76–80.
    [20]
    黄雄. 爆破荷载作用下埋地钢管的动力响应研究 [D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2018: 17–46.

    HUANG X. Dynamic response of buried steel pipe subjected to blast loads [D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2018: 17–46.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views(6662) PDF downloads(35) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return