Experimental Study on Re-initiation of 2H2+O2+nAr Premixed Gas by Cylindrical Obstacle
-
摘要: 开展了不同反应活性的2H2+O2+nAr气相爆轰波与圆柱形障碍物相互作用的实验研究。通过在管道顶部布置压电式压力传感器记录压力到达时间,并以此计算爆轰波传播速度。采用纹影技术和烟迹法记录爆轰破坏到再起爆全过程的波系及胞格结构。结果表明:爆轰波在障碍物上游接触障碍物时会发生反射;越过障碍物后,在障碍物下游会发生衍射。爆轰波越过障碍物时,受障碍物尾部膨胀波的影响,爆轰波衰减解耦,但随着从圆柱形障碍物两侧绕过的衍射激波在障碍物后轴线和管道中心轴线处碰撞,继而发生马赫反射以及入射激波与下游管道壁面碰撞发生马赫反射,完成再起爆过程。直径较小的障碍物造成的爆轰波能量损失较少,其胞格爆轰波的再起爆距离随障碍物直径的减小而缩短。针对不同直径障碍物的实验结果均表明,随着初始压力升高,预混气体反应活性增加,爆轰的自持稳定性增强,从而削弱了障碍物几何尺寸的影响,有利于减弱爆轰的衰减并缩短再起爆距离。在所研究的障碍物几何尺寸下,通过测量爆轰再起爆距离,建立了不同比例Ar稀释下的2H2+O2在圆柱形障碍物后的再起爆距离与圆柱垂直间距及胞格尺寸的关系。Abstract: In this paper, the interaction between 2H2+O2+nAr gas-phase detonation waves with different reactivities and cylindrical obstacles was investigated by experiments. Piezoelectric pressure sensors were flushed-mounted on the top wall of the channel to record pressure time histories, from which the detonation wave velocities were calculated. The schlieren technology and smoked foil technique were used to record the wave system and cellular structure of the whole process from detonation failure to re-initiation. The results show that the detonation wave will be reflected when it touches the obstacle, and diffraction will occur downstream of the obstacle after crossing the obstacle. When the detonation wave crosses the obstacle, it is attenuated and decoupled by the expansion wave at the tail of the obstacle, but Mach reflection occurs as the diffraction shock wave bypassing both sides of the cylindrical obstacle collides at the rear axis of the obstacle and the central axis of the channel, and Mach reflection occurs when the incident shock collides with the downstream channel wall, completing the re-initiation process. The obstacles with smaller diameters cause less energy loss of the detonation wave, and the re-initiation distances of the cell detonation wave shorten with the decrease of the diameters of the obstacles. The experimental results of obstacles of different diameters show that with the increase of initial pressure, the reactivity of the premixed gas increases and the stability of self-sustaining detonation increases, thereby weakening the influence of the geometric size of the obstacles, which is conducive to weakening the attenuation of detonation and shortening the re-initiation distance. Under the geometric dimensions of the obstacles experimented in this paper, the detonation re-initiation distance was measured, and the relationship of re-initiation distance of 2H2+O2 after the cylindrical obstacle under different dilution ratios of Ar was established with the cylindrical vertical spacing and cell size.
-
Key words:
- detonation wave /
- hydrogen /
- cylindrical obstacle /
- diffraction /
- re-initiation
-
Nanoscale inorganic materials with unique electrical, optical and mechanical properties, which are distinct from their bulk counterparts, attract attention in both fundamental scientific research and industrial applications[1-3]. Investigations on the phase transformation and the structural stability of nanomaterials under high pressure are conducted in physics, materials science, geophysics[4-9]. Numerous studies on nanomaterials under high pressure have revealed that the grain size plays an important role in the pressure-induced phase transition behaviors. A number of interesting high-pressure behaviors and new properties in nanomaterials appear when the grain size is smaller than a critical size. Studies on CdSe, CdS, ZnO and ZnS nanocrystals observe the size-dependent phase transformations[10-13]. Lv, et al. [14] reports that the Mn3O4 nanoparticles show a different phase transformation route and a new high-pressure phase at 14.5–23.5 GPa, which has been recognized to be the orthorhombic CaTi2O4-type structure. The crystalline-amorphous transition is discovered in materials such as Y2O3, TiO2, PbTe and BaF2[15-19]. Therefore, high-pressure studies on nanomaterials are significant for the discovery of new structures and properties of materials.
Calcium fluoride (CaF2), a typical face-centered-cubic ionic crystal, has been widely used in many fields[2-3]. Due to its simple crystal structure, CaF2 becomes an ideal material for high-pressure research. High-pressure X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy studies of bulk CaF2 have shown that it undergoes two structural transitions and finally reaches highly coordinated structures. The pressure-induced phase transition from the fluorite structure (space group: Fm3m) to the α-PbCl2-type structure (space group: Pnma) has been found in the pressure range of 8–10 GPa[20-21]. Dorfman, et al.[22] have reported that bulk CaF2 transforms from the α-PbCl2-type structure into the hexagonal structure at 79 GPa and 2 000 K. Inspired by the size effect of nano-sized materials, our group has made progresses in different structural phase transitions and in the compressibility for nanosized MF2 (M=Ca, Sr, Ba) particles at high pressures[19, 23-26]. Previous high-pressure studies on the 8 nm CaF2 nanocrystals reveals that the structural phase transition from the fluorite-type structure into the orthorhombic α-PbCl2-type structure starts at 14 GPa, and the transition pressure is higher than that of the bulk CaF2[23]. Recently, we have performed high-pressure studies on the 23 nm CaF2 nanocrystals up to 23.5 GPa using synchrotron XRD measurement. We have found that the transition from the fluorite to the orthorhombic phase occurrs at 9.5 GPa, significantly lower than the transition pressure of the 8 nm CaF2 nanocrystals, but close to that of the bulk materials[24]. Further analysis indicates that the defect effect in the 23 nm CaF2 nanocrystals plays a key role in the structural stability. Nevertheless, the high pressure induced structural phase transition of the CaF2 nanocrystals with other sizes has not been reported. The phase-transition mechanism and the compressibility of the nanoscale CaF2 are still unclear. In order to further investigate the high pressure behaviors of the nanosized CaF2, and to confirm whether there is a size-dependent phase transformation at high pressure, more high pressure experimental data for various sized CaF2 nanocrystals is urgently needed.
Here we investigate the high-pressure behaviors of the CaF2 nanocrystals with an average grain size of 11 nm using in-situ XRD. We analyse the phase stability, the bulk modulus and the compressibility of the synthesized 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals in details. Through comparing the high pressure experimental data of different sized CaF2 materials, the main factor influencing the structural stability and compression properties of the CaF2 nanomaterials is explored.
1. Materials and Methods
The 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals were prepared by a typical synthesis procedure, as reported in literatures[27-28]. 2 mmol Ca(NO3)2 and 4 mmol NaF were added into a mixture which consisted of ethanol, oil acid, and sodium hydroxide. After being vigorously stirred, the white suspension was transferred into a 40 mL autoclave. The heat-treatment condition at a temperature of 160℃ was maintained for 24 h. Then, the autoclave was cooled down to room temperature, and the final products were collected after centrifugation and drying treatments.
The crystalline structure, the morphology and the particle size of the CaF2 nanocrystals were examined by XRD (D8 DISCOVER GADDS) with Cu Kα radiation (
λ =1.5418 Å) and by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, H-7500). The sample was loaded into a diamond anvil cell (DAC) with a culet size of 400 μm for high-pressure analysis. The fluorescence shift of the ruby R1 line was utilized to calibrate the pressure, and an methanol-ethanol mixture with a volume ratio of 4∶1 was chosen as the pressure-transmitting medium. High-pressure XRD experiment was performed at B2 High-Pressure Station of Cornell High Energy Synchrotron Source (CHESS) with a wavelength of 0.485946 Å. MAR165 CCD detector was used to collect the XRD data. The 2D XRD images were integrated using FIT2D software. Materials Studio program was performed to refine the crystal structure using the high-pressure synchrotron XRD patterns.2. Results and Discussion
Fig.1(a) exhibits the dimension and the morphology of the synthesized CaF2 nanocrystals, and the corresponding particles’ size distribution histogram is presented in Fig.1(b). Fig.1 reveals that all the nanoparticles are well dispersed and almost sphere with an average diameter of (11 ± 2) nm. The selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (inset in Fig.1(a)) shows that the major diffraction rings of the fluorite structure, indicating that the synthezied CaF2 nanocrystals have probably the fluorite structure.
Fig.2 presents the Rietveld refinement of the diffraction pattern of the synthesized CaF2 nano-particles at ambient conditions. The great agreement between simulations and XRD experiments at ambient conditions with the residuals Rwp=7.73% and Rp=5.99% unraveled that the ambient pressure phase adopts a fluorite structure with a space group of Fm3m. The fluorite structure is constructed by the Ca atoms occupying the (0, 0, 0) positions and by the F atoms occupying the (0.25, 0.25, 0.25) positions. The cubic structure has an lattice constant of 5.461(2) Å. It is consistent with the value of a0=5.463 Å (JCPDS Card No. 35-0816).
Fig.3 displays the selected high-pressure XRD patterns of the CaF2 nanocrystals under different pressures up to 28.6 GPa. At 1.0 GPa, six diffraction peaks of (111)c, (220)c, (311)c, (400)c, (331)c and (422)c of the CaF2 nanocrystals are observed, together with one peak of the T-301 stainless steel gasket (marked by asterisk). When the pressure reaches 12 GPa, the (111) diffraction peak becomes asymmetric, and a new diffraction peak starts to appear at the right side of the (111) peak, which indicates the occurrence of a phase transition from the fluorite structure to the α-PbCl2-type structure. The transition pressure is much higher than the one reported in the bulk CaF2 materials and slightly lower than that of the 8 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals[23]. When the pressure increases to 20.8 GPa, all the diffraction peaks (120)o, (111)o, (121)o, (211)o, (031)o, (002)o and (240)o can be assigned to the arised high pressure phase, illustrating the completion of the phase transition. The α-PbCl2-type structure is stable up to 28.6 GPa (the highest pressure in this study). Then the sample is decompressed to ambient pressure, and it turns out that the pure high-pressure α-PbCl2-type structure is retained, which indicates the phase transformation is irreversible. Fig.4 presents the Rietveld refinement of the diffraction pattern of the CaF2 nanocrystals at ambient conditions after decompression, and it shows a quite good agreement with the α-PbCl2-type structure (with the residual Rwp=0.40 %).
Fig.5 shows the compressibility of the CaF2 nanocrystals. A third-order Birch-Murnaghan (BM) equation of state (EOS) is fitted to the experimental p-V data[29]
p=(3/2)B0[(V/V0)−7/3−(V/V0)−5/3]{1+(3/4)(B′0−4)×[(V/V0)−2/3−1]} (1) where V0 is the zero-pressure volume, V is the volume at pressure p given in GPa (V0 and V were calculated by JADE program), B0 is the isothermal bulk modulus,
B′0 is the first pressure derivative of the bulk modulus. For the CaF2 nanocrystals, the fitting yield B0 = 109(5) GPa,B′0 = 5 for the fluorite structure, and B0 = 89(1) GPa,B′0 = 4 for the α-PbCl2-type structure. The isothermal bulk modulus of the α-PbCl2-type phase is lower than that of the fluorite phase. The lower bulk modulus of the high-pressure phase of the CaF2 nanocrystals at high pressure indicates a higher compressibility. This result is consistent with the previous studies on the bulk CaF2, but it is different from the bulks SrF2 and BaF2 which have lower compressibility under high pressure[22, 30]. The bulk moduli of the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals for the fluorite and the α-PbCl2-type structure are both significantly larger than those of the bulk CaF2[21–22] and the 23 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals[24], indicating a higher incompressibility for the CaF2 nanocrystals with smaller grain size. In terms of the Hall-Petch effect[31-32], a continuous decrease of grain size could further elevate material hardness, thus, the increase in bulk modulus of 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals can be easily understood.Table 1 summarizes the phase transition pressure (pT), the EOS parameters (B0 and
B′0 ) of the bulk CaF2 and the CaF2 nanocrystals with different grain sizes, which clearly reveals the differences between the bulk and the nanoscale CaF2. It is found that the phase transition pressure and the bulk modulus of the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals are higher than those of the bulk CaF2 and the 23 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals. A large number of high pressure investigations indicate that many nanomaterials (e.g., CdSe, ZnS and PbS) exhibit obvious elevations of structural stability compared with their bulk materials, which is attributed to the higher surface energies in nanomaterials[10, 13, 33]. Compared with the bulk CaF2 and the 23 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals, a relatively higher surface energy is expected for the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals, and thus the elevations both in the transition pressure and in the bulk modulus can be easily understood.Table 1. Transition pressure (pT ), and EOS parameters (B0 and B0 ′) of the fluorite-type and the α-PbCl2-type CaF2Besides the different high-pressure behaviors with the bulk CaF2 and the 23 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals, Table 1 shows that the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals exhibit a lower transition pressure[23] and a lower bulk modulus compared with the 8 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals. To the best of our knowledge, defects and grain size are considered to be the main factors in influencing the high-pressure behaviors of the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals and the 8 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals. For further analyses, we have carried out HRTEM measurements of many grains of the 11 nm-sized CaF2. The HRTEM image is given in Fig.6, it shows that the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals have no visible defects and dislocations, indicating a relatively low defect concentration. Obviously, the decrease of the transition pressure in the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals cannot be attributed to the defects (or dislocation) effect. Therefore, the differences in the phase transformations between the 11 nm and the 8 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals may be caused by the grain size effect. The 8 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals, which have a smaller grain size, possess a higher surface energy, that could result in the elevation of the phase transition pressure.
Our results illustrate that the transition pressure dramatically increases as the size of the grains decreases, and the CaF2 nanocrystals show a noticeable size-dependence of phase transformation at high pressure when the grain size below 11 nm. Therefore, it can be reasonably concluded that the critical size of the CaF2 nanocrystals, marking the oneset of nanoscal effect, is larger than 11 nm. For the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals, the high-pressure metastable structure (α-PbCl2-type structure) is retained after the pressure is released, without observing the fluorite structure. This result is in good accordance with the oberservation for the 8 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals[23], but it is different with those of the bulk CaF2 and the 23 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals whose transformations are completely or partially reversible[21, 24]. The inreversibility of the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals might be due to the high surface energy, which lead to the solid-solid phase transition hysteresis after decompression. Discovering novel high-pressure metastable structure is one of the main purposes of the high pressure study of the CaF2 nanocrystals.
3. Conclusions
In summary, the high-pressure behaviors of the CaF2 nanocrystals with an average grain size of 11 nm have been investigated by in-situ XRD. The phase transition from the fluorite structure to the α-PbCl2-type structure occurrs at 12 GPa, which is much higher than the value observed for the bulk CaF2 and slightly lower than that of the 8 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals. The bulk moduli of the CaF2 nanocrystals with the fluorite or the α-PbCl2-type structures are all larger than those of the bulk CaF2, indicating a high incompressibility of nanosized CaF2. The pure α-PbCl2-type metastable structure is retained in the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals after decompression. Such distinct high-pressure behaviors of the 11 nm-sized CaF2 nanocrystals are considered to be mainly due to the grain size effect. When the size is below the critical size, the high surface energy begins directing the enhancement of the structural stability and the increase of the bulk modulus.
-
-
[1] 姜宗林, 滕宏辉, 刘云峰. 气相爆轰物理的若干研究进展 [J]. 力学进展, 2012, 42(2): 129–140. doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-2012-2-20120202JIANG Z L, TENG H H, LIU Y F. Some research progress on gaseous detonation physics [J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2012, 42(2): 129–140. doi: 10.6052/1000-0992-2012-2-20120202 [2] 张静雯, 彭澳, 陈先锋, 等. 扰动作用下爆轰形成机理 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2022, 36(6): 062303.ZHANG J W, PENG A, CHEN X F, et al. Mechanisms of detonation initiation under the effect of perturbation [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2022, 36(6): 062303. [3] 韩文虎, 张博, 王成. 气相爆轰波起爆与传播机理研究进展 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(12): 121402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0398HAN W H, ZHANG B, WANG C. Progress in studying mechanisms of initiation and propagation for gaseous detonations [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(12): 121402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0398 [4] 王昌建, 徐胜利, 费立森. 气相爆轰波绕射流场显示研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2006, 26(1): 27–32. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2006.01.005WANG C J, XU S L, FEI L S. Flow field visualization for gaseous detonation diffractionexperiments [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 27–32. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2006.01.005 [5] SHI X Y, PAN J F, JIANG C, et al. Effect of obstacles on the detonation diffraction and subsequent re-initiation [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(10): 6936–6954. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.026 [6] 马秋菊, 邵俊程, 王众山, 等. 氢气比例和点火能量对CH4-H2混合气体爆炸强度影响的实验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2020, 34(1): 015201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190803MA Q J, SHAO J C, WANG Z S, et al. Experimental study of the hydrogen proportion and ignition energy effects on the CH4-H2 mixture explosion intensity [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2020, 34(1): 015201. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190803 [7] 倪靖, 潘剑锋, 姜超, 等. 掺氢比对甲烷-氧气爆轰特性的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(4): 042102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0237NI J, PAN J F, JIANG C, et al. Effects of hydrogen-blending ratio on detonation characteristics of premixed methane-oxygen gas [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(4): 042102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0237 [8] 赵焕娟, 刘婧, 周冬雷, 等. 多孔材料对氢气爆轰的抑制作用 [J]. 化工学报, 2023, 74(2): 968–976.ZHAO H J, LIU J, ZHOU D L, et al. Inhibition effect of porous materials on hydrogen detonation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2023, 74(2): 968–976. [9] 雷明川, 喻健良, 闫兴清, 等. 惰性气体对氢气/空气爆轰传播的抑制作用 [J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(10): 4754–4761.LEI M C, YU J L, YAN X Q, et al. Inhibition of hydrogen/air detonation propagation by inert gases [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(10): 4754–4761. [10] PENG H, LIU W, LIU S, et al. Experimental investigations on ethylene-air continuous rotating detonation wave in the hollow chamber with laval nozzle [J]. Acta Astronaut, 2018, 151: 137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.025 [11] 贺顺江, 任会兰, 李健. 环形通道内爆轰波的起爆机制 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2023, 37(1): 015202.HE S J, REN H L, LI J. Initiation mechanism of detonation wave in an annular channel [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2023, 37(1): 015202. [12] 李红宾, 李建玲, 熊姹, 等. 超音速来流中爆轰波衍射和二次起爆过程研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(4): 041401.LI H B, LI J L, XIONG C, et al. Numerical investigation on detonation diffraction and re-initiation processes in a supersonic inflow [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 041401. [13] 刘曦, 李健. 楔面角度扰动对斜爆轰结构的影响研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2022, 42(9): 891–899.LIU X, LI J. Influence of wedge angle disturbance on the structure of oblique detonation [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2022, 42(9): 891–899. [14] 栾溟弋, 武克文, 张树杰, 等. 连续爆轰发动机研究进展 [J]. 宇航总体技术, 2022, 6(3): 10–20.LUAN M Y, WU K W, ZHANG S J, et al. Progress in rotating detonation engine [J]. Astronautical Systems Engineering Technology, 2022, 6(3): 10–20. [15] 尚甲豪, 胡国暾, 汪球, 等. 高速弹丸诱导斜爆轰激波结构实验研究 [J]. 力学学报, 2023, 55(2): 309–317. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-536SHANG J H, HU G T, WANG Q, et al. Experiment investigation of oblique detonation wave structure induced by hypersonic projectiles [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2023, 55(2): 309–317. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-536 [16] 韩信, 刘云峰, 张子健, 等. 提高高马赫数超燃冲压发动机推力的理论方法 [J]. 力学学报, 2022, 54(3): 633–643. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-350HAN X, LIU Y F, ZHANG Z J, et al. The theoretical method to increase the thrust of high Mach number scramjets [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54(3): 633–643. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-21-350 [17] PINTGEN F, SHEPHERD J E. Detonation diffraction in gases [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(3): 665–677. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.09.008 [18] LEE J H S. On the measure of the relative detonation hazards of gaseous fuel-oxygen and air mixtures [J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1979, 17(1): 1269–1280. doi: 10.1016/S0082-0784(79)80120-4 [19] OHYAGI S, OBARA T, HOSHI S, et al. Diffraction and re-initiation of detonations behind a backward-facing step [J]. Shock Waves, 2002, 12(3): 221–226. doi: 10.1007/s00193-002-0156-z [20] BEDAREV I A, TEMERBEKOV V M. Modeling of attenuation and suppression of cellular detonation in the hydrogen-air mixture by circular obstacles [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(90): 38455–38467. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.307 [21] SAIF M, WANG W T, PEKALSKI A, et al. Chapman-Jouguet deflagrations and their transition to detonation [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 2771–2779. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.122 [22] RADULESCU M, SHARPE G, BRADLEY D. A universal parameter quantifying explosion hazards, detonability and hot spot formation: the χ number [C]//Proceedings of the Seventh International Seminar Fire and Explosion Hazards. University of Maryland, College Park, USA. Singapore: Research Publishing, 2013: 617–626. [23] YANG T, HE Q, NING J, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on detonation failure and re-initiation behind a half-cylinder [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(25): 12711–12725. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.230 [24] 景天雨, 任会兰, 李健. 气相爆轰波马赫反射过驱动马赫杆演化过程的实验研究 [J]. 中国科学: 技术科学, 2021, 51(4): 446–458. doi: 10.1360/SST-2020-0427JING T Y, REN H L, LI J. Transition of an overdriven Mach stem in the Mach reflection of detonations in H2/O2 mixtures [J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2021, 51(4): 446–458. doi: 10.1360/SST-2020-0427 [25] RAM O, GEVA M, SADOT O. High spatial and temporal resolution study of shock wave reflection over a coupled convex-concave cylindrical surface [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 768: 219–239. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.80 [26] GUO C M, ZHANG D L, XIE W. The Mach reflection of a detonation based on soot track measurements [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2001, 127(3): 2051–2058. doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00307-8 [27] 牛淑贞, 杨鹏飞, 杨旸, 等. 来流速度突变对斜爆轰反射波系驻定特性影响的数值研究 [J]. 中国科学: 物理学 力学 天文学, 2023, 53(3): 164–176.NIU S Z, YANG P F, YANG Y, et al. Numerical study of the effect of a sudden change in flow velocity on the stability of an oblique detonation reflected wave system [J]. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2023, 53(3): 164–176. [28] LV Y, IHME M. Computational analysis of re-ignition and re-initiation mechanisms of quenched detonation waves behind a backward facing step [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2015, 35(2): 1963–1972. [29] YUAN X Q, ZHOU J, LIU S J, et al. Diffraction of cellular detonation wave over a cylindrical convex wall [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2020, 169: 94–107. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.12.039 [30] VASIL’EV A A, VASIL’EV V A. Diffraction of waves in combustible mixtures [J]. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 2010, 83(6): 1178–1196. doi: 10.1007/s10891-010-0441-0 [31] 王鲁庆, 马宏昊, 王波, 等. 氢气/甲烷-空气爆轰波在含环形障碍物圆管内传播的试验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2018, 32(3): 123–129. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20170687WANG L Q, MA H H, WANG B, et al. Detonation propagation in hydrogen/methane-air mixtures in a round tube filled with orifice plates [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2018, 32(3): 123–129. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20170687 [32] LI Q, KELLENBERGER M, CICCARELLI G. Geometric influence on the propagation of the quasi-detonations in a stoichiometric H2-O2 mixture [J]. Fuel, 2020, 269: 117396. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117396 [33] 范菊梦, 沈婷, 刘丹丹, 等. 浓度梯度对火焰加速和爆燃转爆轰的影响 [J]. 工程热物理学报, 2023, 44(1): 266–273.FAN J M, SHEN T, LIU D D, et al. Effects of composition gradient on flame acceleration and transition to detonation [J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2023, 44(1): 266–273. [34] GOODWIN D G, MOFFAT H K, SPETH R L. Cantera: an object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes [CP]. (2015-08-13)[2023-05-30]. http://www.cantera.org. [35] 张治. 管道内衬边界对氢气爆轰抑制机理研究 [D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2021: 69–72.ZHANG Z. Study of hydrogen detonation suppression mechanism by inner boundary of channel [D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2021: 69–72. [36] GRONDIN J S, LEE J H S. Experimental observation of the onset of detonation downstream of a perforated plate [J]. Shock Waves, 2010, 20: 381–386. doi: 10.1007/s00193-010-0267-x -