乳化炸药水下爆炸载荷输出特性实验研究

郑欣颖; 李海涛; 张弛; 吕岩松

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20220502

乳化炸药水下爆炸载荷输出特性实验研究

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20220502

海军工程大学舰船与海洋学院, 湖北武汉　430033

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（51679244）

详细信息

作者简介:
郑欣颖（1998－），男，硕士研究生，主要从事舰船抗爆抗冲击研究. E-mail：zxy_18271333753@163.com

通讯作者:
吕岩松（1976－），男，博士，副教授，主要从事舰船结构研究. E-mail：navylys@163.com

中图分类号: O381
计量
- 文章访问数: 217
- HTML全文浏览量: 99
- PDF下载量: 32
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-01-10
- 修回日期: 2022-03-07
- 网络出版日期: 2022-07-27
- 刊出日期: 2022-07-28

Experimental Study on Load Characteristics of Underwater Explosion for an Emulsion Explosive

College of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, Hubei, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究乳化炸药水下爆炸载荷输出特性，开展了乳化炸药水下爆炸实验，通过改变药量、爆距、爆深等参数，得到了不同工况下乳化炸药水下爆炸冲击波和气泡载荷典型参数，分析了其能量输出结构，并将实验结果与TNT炸药水下爆炸载荷计算公式进行对比，获得了乳化炸药水下爆炸载荷的TNT当量。结果表明：Geers-Hunter载荷公式可以预测乳化炸药水下爆炸载荷输出的一般规律，特别是气泡脉动周期；气泡脉动压力峰值是初始冲击波压力峰值的10%～20%，气泡能是冲击波能的2倍左右；脉动压力变化呈现先缓慢上升达到峰值后急速下降趋于零并保持平稳的态势，波形上升沿耗时普遍比下降沿耗时长；乳化炸药水下爆炸在等冲击波超压和等气泡脉动周期下的TNT当量平均值分别约为0.595和0.646。研究结果可为乳化炸药的水下爆炸应用提供重要参考。
- 乳化炸药 /
- 水下爆炸 /
- TNT当量 /
- 冲击波 /
- 气泡脉动
Abstract: In order to study the load characteristics of underwater explosion for an emulsion explosive, underwater explosion experiments of the emulsion explosive were carried out. By changing critical parameters such as explosive charge mass, explosion distance and depth, the typical parameters of underwater explosion shock waves and bubble loads were obtained for different cases. The energy output was analyzed and compared with TNT for the calculation formula of underwater explosion loads, then the TNT equivalence for underwater explosion of the emulsion explosive was attained. The results show that Geers-Hunter formula can predict the general law of load output of underwater explosion for the emulsion explosive, especially with regard to the bubble pulsation period. The bubble oscillation pressure accounts for 10%–20% of the initial shock wave peak pressure, and the bubble energy is about twice the shock wave energy. The oscillation pressure waveform exhibits a trend of slowly rising to the peak, then rapidly falling to zero and keeping a steady state, thus the rising edge of the waveform generally takes longer time than the falling edge. The average TNT equivalence of the emulsion explosive in underwater explosion is about 0.595 as to the same shock wave overpressure, and about 0.646 as to the same bubble pulsation period. This research results can provide important reference for the application of emulsion explosives in underwater explosion.
- emulsion explosive /
- underwater explosion /
- TNT equivalence /
- shock wave /
- bubble oscillation

HTML全文

图 1 实验布局

Figure 1. Experimental arrangement

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同工况下乳化炸药水下爆炸压力时程曲线

Figure 2. Pressure histories of underwater explosion for the emulsion explosive under different cases

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 压力的实验曲线与Geers-Hunter公式计算曲线的对比

Figure 3. Comparison of pressure histories between experiment and Geers-Hunter formula

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同工况下乳化炸药水下爆炸气泡脉动压力随时间变化曲线

Figure 4. Histories of bubble oscillation pressure for different cases in underwater explosion of the emulsion explosive

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 超压峰值与比例距离的拟合曲线

Figure 5. Fitting curve between peak overpressure and scaled distance

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 气泡脉动周期与比例爆深的拟合曲线

Figure 6. Fitting curve between bubble pulsation period and scaled explosion depth

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 实验工况

Table 1. Experimental cases

Case	m_e/g	h/m	R/m	$\bar{r}$/(m·kg^−1/3)	Case	m_e/g	h/m	R/m	$\bar{r}$/(m·kg^−1/3)
1	10	1.5	1.2	5.570	5	80	1.0	1.2	2.785
2	10	1.5	1.5	6.962	6	80	1.0	1.5	3.481
3	80	1.5	1.2	2.785	7	160	1.5	1.2	2.210
4	80	1.5	1.5	3.481	8	160	1.5	1.5	2.763

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 实验结果与经验公式计算结果对比

Table 2. Comparison between experimental results and empirical formula

Case No.	p_m			T			I
Case No.	Exp./ MPa	Theor./ MPa	Error/ %	Exp./ ms	Theor./ ms	Error/ %	Exp./ (kN·s·m⁻²)	Theor./ (kN·s·m⁻²)	Error/ %
1	4.7	6.2	24.1	56	46	21.7	0.180	0.204	11.8
2	3.9	4.8	18.8	56	46	21.7	0.129	0.164	21.3
3	11.8	13.8	14.5	107	95	12.6	0.601	0.742	19.0
4	8.5	10.7	20.6	99	95	4.2	0.343	0.609	43.7
5	12.0	13.8	13.0	105	98	7.1	0.532	0.742	28.3
6	9.0	10.7	15.9	107	98	9.2	0.403	0.609	33.8
7	17.0	17.9	5.0	133	120	10.8	0.916	1.150	20.3
8	14.1	13.9	1.4	134	120	11.7	0.811	0.943	14.0

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 乳化炸药的能量输出结构

Table 3. Energy structure of emulsion explosive

Case No.	m_e/g	h/m	R/m	E_s/(kJ·g⁻¹)	E_b/(kJ·g⁻¹)	μE_s/E_b	E_t/(kJ·g⁻¹)
1	10	1.5	1.2	0.841	2.416	0.473	3.560
2	10	1.5	1.5	0.824	2.416	0.464	3.537
3	80	1.5	1.2	0.908	2.416	0.511	3.651
4	80	1.5	1.5	0.880	2.416	0.495	3.613
5	80	1.0	1.2	0.904	2.419	0.508	3.648
6	80	1.0	1.5	0.884	2.419	0.497	3.621
7	160	1.5	1.2	0.921	2.416	0.518	3.669
8	160	1.5	1.5	0.901	2.416	0.507	3.641

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	孟龙, 黄瑞源, 王金相, 等. 小当量梯恩梯水下爆炸气泡脉动的数值模拟 [J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(Suppl 1): 64−71. MENG L, HUANG R Y, WANG J X, et al. Numerical simulation of bubble pulsation of small-scaled TNT in underwater explosion [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2020, 41(Suppl 1): 64−71.
[2]	LI H T, ZHANG C, ZHENG X Y, et al. A simplified theoretical model of the whipping response of a hull girder subjected to underwater explosion considering the damping effect [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 239: 109831. doi: 10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2021.109831
[3]	LI H T, ZHENG X Y, ZHANG C, et al. Sagging damage characteristics of hull girder with trapezoidal cross-section subjected to near-field underwater explosion [J]. Defence Technology, 2021.
[4]	TANG M J, PENG J H. A new conception on TNT equivalence [C]//Proceedings of China-Japan Seminar on Energetic Materials. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 1996: 139−148.
[5]	乔小玲, 胡毅亭, 彭金华, 等. 岩石型乳化炸药的TNT当量 [J]. 爆破器材, 1998, 27(6): 5–8. QIAO X L, HU Y T, PENG J H, et al. TNT equivalence of a rock emulsion explosive [J]. Explosive Materials, 1998, 27(6): 5–8.
[6]	范俊余, 方秦, 张亚栋, 等. 岩石乳化炸药TNT当量系数的试验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2011, 32(10): 1243–1249. FAN J Y, FANG Q, ZHANG Y D, et al. Experimental investigation on the TNT equivalence coefficient of a rock emulsion explosive [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2011, 32(10): 1243–1249.
[7]	夏曼曼, 吴红波, 徐飞扬, 等. 乳化炸药空中爆炸冲击波衰减规律的研究 [J]. 爆破器材, 2017, 46(4): 21–24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2017.04.004 XIA M M, WU H B, XU F Y, et al. Attenuation rules of shock wave in air blasting of emulsion explosive [J]. Explosive Materials, 2017, 46(4): 21–24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2017.04.004
[8]	赵根, 季荣, 郑晓宁, 等. 乳化炸药水中爆炸冲击波传播规律试验研究 [J]. 爆破, 2011, 28(2): 1–4. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2011.02.001 ZHAO G, JI R, ZHENG X N, et al. Experimental investigation on propagation rule of shock wave by emulsion explosives underwater blasting [J]. Blasting, 2011, 28(2): 1–4. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2011.02.001
[9]	汪泉, 徐定博, 张显丕. 乳化炸药水下爆炸能量输出特性的实验研究 [J]. 山东工业技术, 2016(23): 297–298. doi: 10.16640/j.cnki.37-1222/t.2016.23.261 WANG Q, XU D B, ZHANG X P. Experimental study on energy output characteristics of emulsion explosive in underwater explosion [J]. Shandong Industrial Technology, 2016(23): 297–298. doi: 10.16640/j.cnki.37-1222/t.2016.23.261
[10]	朱锡, 张振华, 梅志远, 等. 舰船结构毁伤力学 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2013: 26−27. ZHU X, ZHANG Z H, MEI Z Y, et al. Damage mechanics of warship structure subjected to explosion [M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2013: 26−27.
[11]	朱锡, 牟金磊, 洪江波, 等. 水下爆炸气泡脉动特性的试验研究 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2007, 28(4): 365–368. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2007.04.001 ZHU X, MU J L, HONG J B, et al. Experimental study of characters of bubble impulsion induced by underwater explosions [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2007, 28(4): 365–368. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2007.04.001
[12]	饶国宁, 陈网桦, 胡毅亭, 等. 不同炸药水下能量输出特性的实验研究 [J]. 爆破器材, 2007, 36(1): 9–11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2007.01.003 RAO G N, CHEN W H, HU Y T, et al. Experimental study on underwater energy output characteristics of different explosives [J]. Explosive Materials, 2007, 36(1): 9–11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2007.01.003
[13]	周霖, 徐少辉, 徐更光. 炸药水下爆炸能量输出特性研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2006, 27(2): 235–238. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2006.02.011 ZHOU L, XU S H, XU G G. Research on energy output characteristics for underwater explosion of explosives [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2006, 27(2): 235–238. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2006.02.011
[14]	牟金磊, 朱锡, 李海涛, 等. 炸药水下爆炸能量输出特性试验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2010, 24(2): 88–92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2010.02.002 MU J L, ZHU X, LI H T, et al. Experimental research on underwater explosion energy output of explosive [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2010, 24(2): 88–92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5773.2010.02.002
[15]	GEERS T L, HUNTER K S. An integrated wave-effects model for an underwater explosion bubble [J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2002, 111(4): 1584–1601. doi: 10.1121/1.1458590
[16]	徐森, 张兴明, 潘峰, 等. 工业炸药能量测试方法的分析 [J]. 爆破器材, 2013, 42(1): 18–21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2013.01.005 XU S, ZHANG X M, PAN F, et al. Analysis on the energy testing methods of industrial explosives [J]. Explosive Materials, 2013, 42(1): 18–21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2013.01.005
[17]	秦健, 艾东民, 吴成, 等. 几种炸药水下爆炸能量损失特性分析研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(Suppl 2): 38−42. QIN J, AI D M, WU C, et al. Research on energy dissipation characteristics of underwater explosion of explosives [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(Suppl 2): 38−42.
[18]	朱锡, 李海涛, 牟金磊, 等. 水下近距爆炸作用下船体梁的动态响应特性 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2010, 24(5): 343–350. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2010.05.005 ZHU X, LI H T, MU J L, et al. Dynamic response characteristics of ship-like beam subjected to underwater explosion in near field [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2010, 24(5): 343–350. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2010.05.005
[19]	COLE P. 水下爆炸 [M]. 罗耀杰, 译. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1960: 20−23.