新型仿生蜂窝结构的设计与耐撞性能分析

于鹏山; 刘志芳; 李世强

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20210817

新型仿生蜂窝结构的设计与耐撞性能分析

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210817

太原理工大学机械与运载工程学院应用力学研究所, 山西太原　030024

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11772216，12072219）

详细信息

作者简介:
于鹏山（1994－），男，硕士研究生，主要从事冲击动力学研究. E-mail：1850068840@qq.com

通讯作者:
刘志芳（1971－），女，副教授，主要从事冲击动力学研究. E-mail：liuzhifang@tyut.edu.cn

中图分类号: O341
计量
- 文章访问数: 1185
- HTML全文浏览量: 934
- PDF下载量: 99
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-06-18
- 修回日期: 2021-07-01

Design and Crashworthiness Analysis of New Bionic Honeycomb Structure

Institute of Applied Mechanics, College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China

摘要

摘要: 受自然界毛竹微观结构的启发，在传统圆管与六边形管的基础上引入内管及双菱形肋骨，通过拓扑衍生方法设计了两种新型仿生蜂窝结构。在此基础上利用有限元软件ABAQUS对新型仿生蜂窝的耐撞性进行数值模拟，研究了蜂窝单胞构型、蜂窝壁厚、双菱形肋骨夹角对仿生蜂窝耐撞性能的影响。此外，基于超折叠单元理论，建立了仿生蜂窝结构的理论分析模型。结果表明：仿生蜂窝的面外压缩耐撞性能优于传统圆形蜂窝和传统六边形蜂窝。新型仿生六边形蜂窝的比吸能相比传统六边形蜂窝提高51.18%，压缩力效率提高53.14%。仿生蜂窝结构的平均压缩力理论预测结果与数值模拟结果吻合，两者间的误差均在10%以内。单胞构型为六边形的仿生蜂窝的耐撞性能优于圆形仿生蜂窝。适当增加仿生蜂窝壁厚或增大双菱形肋骨夹角，均有利于提高结构的耐撞性能。
- 仿生蜂窝 /
- 双菱形肋骨 /
- 超折叠单元 /
- 比吸能
Abstract: Inspired by the microstructures of bamboo in nature, two new bionic honeycomb structures were designed based on topological derivation method by introducing inner tube and double diamond ribs on the basis of traditional round tube and hexagonal tube. The performances of the bionic honeycomb structures and the traditional honeycomb structures under quasi-static compression are compared, and the theoretical analysis model of the bionic honeycomb structures is established based on the simplified super folding element theory. On this basis, ABAQUS finite element software is used to simulate the crashworthiness of the new bionic honeycombs. The influences of the single cell configuration, the wall thickness and the angle of the double diamond ribs of the honeycomb on the crashworthiness of the bionic honeycombs are studied. The results show that the crashworthiness of the bionic honeycombs is better than that of the traditional circular honeycomb and the traditional hexagonal honeycomb. Compared with the traditional hexagonal honeycomb, the specific energy absorption and compression force efficiency of the new bionic hexagonal honeycomb are increased by 51.18% and 53.14%, respectively. The theoretical predictions on the average compression forces of the bionic honeycomb structures are consistent with the numerical simulation results, and the errors are less than 10%. The crashworthiness of the hexagonal bionic honeycomb is better than that of the circular bionic honeycomb. Moreover, the crashworthiness of the bionic honeycomb structure can be improved by increasing the wall thickness appropriately, or by increasing the angle of the double diamond ribs.
- bionic honeycomb /
- double diamond ribs /
- super folding element /
- specific energy absorption

HTML全文

复合材料板具有较高的强度质量比、良好的耐腐蚀性和优异的可设计性，被广泛应用于航空航天和工业制造等领域^[1]。在实际使用中复合材料板经常受到不同形式的冲击荷载，从而产生振动和屈曲问题，因此冲击载荷作用下复合材料板的动力稳定性问题备受关注。

近年来关于复合材料板的研究越来越多，尤其是冲击荷载作用下复合材料板的动力稳定性问题研究^[2]，对工程部件结构设计和使用具有重要的意义。Sun等^[3]研究了在加热环境中应力波对功能梯度圆柱壳轴向冲击屈曲的影响；毛柳伟等^[4]对弹性直杆在应力波作用下的动力分叉屈曲进行了分析与探讨，提出了求解应力波作用下直杆动力屈曲的数值方法；Lepik^[5]讨论了在应力波影响下轴向压缩的弹塑性梁的屈曲；Zhang等^[6]分析了不确定初始几何缺陷对薄板屈曲的影响；Abdelaziz等^[7]利用双曲线剪切变形理论，分析了在各种边界条件下复合材料板的弯曲变形和屈曲；Kouchakzadeh等^[8]采用线性和旋转弹簧的均匀分布来模拟边界条件，对矩形层压复合板的屈曲进行了分析；Czapski等^[9]通过数值和实验方法，研究了残余应力对压缩至破坏期间薄壁层压板屈曲性能的影响。

在实际工程中，复合材料板多应用于振动环境，其在动力响应下的动态特性和振动分析是必不可少的，因而对该类材料的振动屈曲研究至关重要。Kuo^[10]研究了两种非均匀分布纤维复合材料板的振动屈曲问题，Villarreal等^[11]对典型正交异性板的本征频率和振动屈曲进行了理论分析，Eftekhari等^[12]提出了通过组合应用有限元方法和微分正交方法求解矩形板的振动屈曲问题，Rehman等^[13]探讨了壳体结构的缺陷和损坏对结构振动屈曲的影响，Sayyad等^[14]将三角剪切变形理论应用于复合板的变形和振动屈曲研究。

关于复合材料板的振动屈曲问题已开展了较多的研究，但大多未考虑应力波效应对振动屈曲的影响，而动力屈曲一般与应力波相联系且具有局部发生的特点，研究含初始缺陷的复合材料板能更好地揭示实际工程中复合材料板在不同工况下发生动力屈曲的机理。基于此，本研究利用Kirchhoff薄板理论和Hamilton原理，考虑应力波效应，建立含初始几何缺陷的四边简支复合材料板的振动控制方程，得到板的屈曲临界荷载表达式，在此基础上通过数值计算讨论初始几何缺陷、振型函数初相位、铺层角度、屈曲模态阶数和铺层层数对复合材料板振动屈曲临界荷载的影响，为工程实际提供理论依据。

1. 复合材料板的控制方程

复合材料板在x = L_a处为固定边界条件，其余3边为简支边界条件，在 $z$ = 0的中性面上受x方向的面内阶跃荷载N作用，如图1所示。板在 $z$ 方向上含初始几何缺陷w₁，且x、y、 $z$ 方向的位移分别为u、v、w。复合材料板的长度、宽度和厚度分别为L_a、L_b、h，由n层单层板组成， $\theta$ 为单层板的铺层角度，即纤维材料铺设方向与x方向的夹角（见图1）。

图 1 复合材料板结构示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of composite plate structure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

根据Kirchhoff薄板理论及经典弹性理论，复合材料板的位移与应变、弹性曲面的曲率和扭率的表达式为

${\begin{cases} {w = {w_1} + {w_0}} \\ {u = {u_0} - z\displaystyle\frac{{\partial \left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial x}}} \\ {v = {v_0} - z\displaystyle\frac{{\partial \left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial y}}} \end{cases}}$

(1)

${\begin{cases} {\varepsilon _x^0 = \displaystyle\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial x}}} \\ {\varepsilon _y^0 = \displaystyle\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial y}}} \\ {\gamma _{xy}^0 = \displaystyle\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial y}} + \displaystyle\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial x}}} \end{cases}}$

(2)

${\begin{cases} {{\kappa _x} = - \displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}\left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \\ {{\kappa _y} = - \displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}\left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial {y^2}}}} \\ {{\kappa _{xy}} = - \displaystyle\frac{{2{\partial ^2}\left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial x\partial y}}} \end{cases}}$

(3)

${\begin{cases} {{\varepsilon _x} = \varepsilon _x^0 + z{\kappa _x}} \\ {{\varepsilon _y} = \varepsilon _y^0 + z{\kappa _y}} \\ {{\gamma _{xy}} = \gamma _{_{xy}}^0 + z{\kappa _{xy}}} \end{cases}}$

(4)

式中：u₀、v₀、w₀分别为复合材料板在x、y、 $z$ 方向上的中面位移， $\varepsilon _x^0$ 、 $\varepsilon _y^0$ 、 $\gamma _{xy}^0$ 分别为复合材料板中面应变分量， ${\kappa _x}$ 、 ${\kappa _y}$ 、 ${\kappa _{xy}}$ 为中面的曲率和扭率， ${\varepsilon _x}$ 、 ${\varepsilon _y}$ 、 ${\gamma _{xy}}$ 为复合材料板任意一点的应变。

板的内力（N_x、N_y、N_xy）与内力矩（M_x、M_y、M_xy）之间的关系为

$\left[ \begin{array}{l} {N_x} \\ {N_y} \\ {N_{xy}} \\ {M_x} \\ {M_y} \\ {M_{xy}} \end{array} \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{A_{11}}}&{{A_{12}}}&{{A_{16}}}&{{B_{11}}}&{{B_{12}}}&{{B_{16}}} \\ {{A_{12}}}&{{A_{22}}}&{{A_{26}}}&{{B_{12}}}&{{B_{22}}}&{{B_{26}}} \\ {{A_{16}}}&{{A_{26}}}&{{A_{66}}}&{{B_{16}}}&{{B_{26}}}&{{B_{66}}} \\ {{B_{11}}}&{{B_{12}}}&{{B_{16}}}&{{D_{11}}}&{{D_{12}}}&{{D_{16}}} \\ {{B_{12}}}&{{B_{22}}}&{{B_{26}}}&{{D_{12}}}&{{D_{22}}}&{{D_{26}}} \\ {{B_{16}}}&{{B_{26}}}&{{B_{66}}}&{{D_{16}}}&{{D_{26}}}&{{D_{66}}} \end{array}} \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\varepsilon _x^0} \\ {\varepsilon _y^0} \\ {\gamma _{xy}^0} \\ {{\kappa _x}} \\ {{\kappa _y}} \\ {{\kappa _{xy}}} \end{array}} \right]$

(5)

式中： ${A}_{ij}$ 、 ${B}_{ij}$ 、 ${D}_{ij} \left(i,j=1,2,6\right)$ 分别表示板的拉伸刚度、耦合刚度和弯曲刚度系数^[15]，表达式如下

${\begin{cases} {{A_{ij}} = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {{{\overline Q_{ij}^k }}\left( {{h_k} - {h_{k - 1}}} \right)} } \\ {{B_{ij}} = \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {{{\overline Q_{ij}^k }}( {{h^2_k} - h_{k - 1}^2} )} } \\ {{D_{ij}} = \displaystyle\frac{1}{3}\displaystyle\sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {{{\overline Q_{ij}^k }}( {{h^3_k} - h_{k - 1}^3} )} } \end{cases}}$

(6)

式中： ${\overline Q_{ij}^k }$ 为复合材料板第 $k$ 层的偏轴刚度系数

$\overline {\boldsymbol{Q}} = {{\boldsymbol{P}}^{ - 1}}{\boldsymbol{Q}}{({{\boldsymbol{P}}^{ - 1}})^{\rm{T}}}$

(7)

式中：P为坐标转换矩阵，Q为刚度矩阵。

${\boldsymbol{P}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{{\cos }^2}\theta }&{{{\sin }^2}\theta }&{2\sin \theta \cos \theta } \\ {{{\sin }^2}\theta }&{{{\cos }^2}\theta }&{ - 2\sin \theta \cos \theta } \\ { - \sin \theta \cos \theta }&{\sin \theta \cos \theta }&{{{\cos }^2}\theta - {{\sin }^2}\theta } \end{array}} \right]$

(8)

${\boldsymbol{Q}}{\rm{ = }}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{Q_{11}}}&{{Q_{12}}}&0 \\ {{Q_{12}}}&{{Q_{22}}}&0 \\ 0&0&{{Q_{66}}} \end{array}} \right]$

(9)

考虑材料为正交各向异性材料，设E₁、E₂、G₁₂、μ₁₂、μ₂₁分别为板材料x和y方向的拉压弹性模量、剪切弹性模量、主泊松比和副泊松比，则有

${Q_{11}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{{E_1}}}{{1 - {\mu _{12}}{\mu _{21}}}},\;\;\;{Q_{22}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{{E_2}}}{{1 - {\mu _{12}}{\mu _{21}}}},\;\;\;{Q_{12}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{{\mu _{12}}{E_2}}}{{1 - {\mu _{12}}{\mu _{21}}}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{{\mu _{21}}{E_1}}}{{1 - {\mu _{12}}{\mu _{21}}}},\;\;\;{Q_{66}}{\rm{ = }}{G_{12}}$

(10)

复合材料板在左端受面内冲击荷载N作用（见图1）时，应力波沿x方向在板内传播，其应力变化如图2所示。

图 2 应力波传播示意图

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of stress wave propagation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

当应力波传播至波阵面位置L_cr（临界长度）时，板发生振动屈曲，板的内力N_t和应力波波速c分别表示为

${N_{\rm{t}}} = {\begin{cases} N&{0 \leqslant x \leqslant {L_{{\rm{cr}}}}} \\ 0&{x > {L_{{\rm{cr}}}}} \end{cases}} ,{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt}{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} c{\rm{ = }}\sqrt {\frac{{{A_{11}}}}{{\rho h}}}$

(11)

板发生振动屈曲时的变形能可以表示为

$\begin{split} U = &\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\displaystyle\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {\left( {{N_x}\varepsilon _x^0 + {N_y}\varepsilon _y^0 + {N_{xy}}\gamma _{xy}^0 + {M_x}{\kappa _x} + {M_y}{\kappa _y} + {M_{xy}}{\kappa _{xy}}} \right)} } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y {\rm{ = }}\\ &\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\displaystyle\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {\left[ {{N_x}\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial x}} + {N_y}\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial y}} + {N_{xy}}\left( {\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial x}} + \frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial y}}} \right) + {M_x}\left( { - \frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \right) + {M_y}\left( { - \frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {y^2}}}} \right) + {M_{xy}}\left( { - \frac{{2{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial x\partial y}}} \right)} \right]} } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y \end{split}$

(12)

发生振动屈曲时的动能（考虑转动惯量）可以表示为

$\begin{split} T =& \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_{ - {h}/{2}}^{{h}/{2}} {\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {{\rho _{\left( k \right)}}\left[ {{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {w_0}}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2}} \right]} } } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y{\rm{d}}z {\rm{ = }}\\ &\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {\left[ {{I_0}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {I_0}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {I_0}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {w_0}}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} - 2{I_1}\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial t}}\displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial x\partial t}} - 2{I_1}\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial t}}\displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial y\partial t}} + {I_2}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial x\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {I_2}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial y\partial t}}} \right)}^2}} \right]} } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y{\rm{ }} \end{split}$

(13)

式中： $\left( {{I_0},\; {I_1},\; {I_2}} \right) = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{{N_k}} {\int_{{h_{k - 1}}}^{{h_k}} {{\rho _{\left( k \right)}}} } \left( {1, \;z, \;{z^2}} \right){\rm{d}}z$ ， ${{\rho _{\left( k \right)}}}$ 为第k层材料的密度。

板发生振动屈曲时的外力功可以表示为

$W = \frac{1}{2}\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {{N_{\rm{t}}}{{\left( {\frac{{\partial w}}{{\partial x}}} \right)}^2}} } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y$

(14)

考虑Hamilton变分原理，即

${\rm{\delta}} \int_{{{{t}}_1}}^{{{{t}}_2}} {\left( {T - U + W} \right)} {\rm{ d}}t = 0$

(15)

将式(12)～式(14)代入式(15)并进行变分计算，可得

$\frac{{\partial {N_x}}}{{\partial x}} + \frac{{\partial {N_{xy}}}}{{\partial x}} - {I_0}\frac{{{\partial ^2}{u_0}}}{{\partial {t^2}}} + {I_1}\frac{{{\partial ^3}{w_0}}}{{\partial x\partial {t^2}}}{\rm{ = }}0$

(16)

$\frac{{\partial {N_y}}}{{\partial y}} + \frac{{\partial {N_{xy}}}}{{\partial y}} - {I_0}\frac{{{\partial ^2}{v_0}}}{{\partial {t^2}}} + {I_1}\frac{{{\partial ^3}{w_0}}}{{\partial y\partial {t^2}}}{\rm{ = }}0$

(17)

$\frac{{{\partial ^2}{M_x}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^2}{M_y}}}{{\partial {y^2}}} - 2\frac{{{\partial ^2}{M_{xy}}}}{{\partial x\partial y}} - {N_{\rm t}}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_1}}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \right) = {I_0}\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {t^2}}}{\kern 1pt} + {I_1}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^3}{u_0}}}{{\partial x\partial {t^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^3}{v_0}}}{{\partial x\partial {t^2}}}} \right) - {I_2}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}\partial {t^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {y^2}\partial {t^2}}}} \right)$

(18)

对于正交各向异性正规对称正交铺设的复合材料板，其刚度矩阵满足^[16]

${D}_{16}={D}_{26}=0,\;\;{A}_{16}={A}_{26}=0,\;\;{B}_{ij}=0$

(19)

根据 Kirchhoff 薄板理论及经典弹性理论，薄板中面在变形过程中没有伸长变形，将板的本构关系代入式(16)～式(18)中，略去含 ${u_0}$ 和 ${v_0}$ 的项，得到复合材料板在面向阶跃荷载激励下的控制方程

${D_{11}}\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^4}}} + \left( {2{D_{12}} + 4{D_{66}}} \right)\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}\partial {y^2}}} + {D_{22}}\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {y^4}}} + {N_{\rm t}}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_1}}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \right) - {I_0}\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {t^2}}} + {I_2}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}\partial {t^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {y^2}\partial {t^2}}}} \right) = 0$

(20)

设三边简支和应力波传播到L_cr（ ${w_0}\left( {{L_{{\rm{cr}}}},y,t} \right) = {w'_0}\left( {{L_{{\rm{cr}}}},y,t} \right) = 0$ ）时的振型函数^[17]为

${w_0}\left( {x,y,t} \right) = {R_{ij}}\left[ {\sin \frac{{i{\text{π}} x}}{{{L_{{\rm{cr}}}}}} + \frac{i}{{i + 1}}\sin \frac{{\left( {i + 1} \right){\text{π}}x }}{{{L_{{\rm{cr}}}}}}} \right]\sin \frac{{j{\text{π}} {{y}}}}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}\sin \left( {\omega {\kern 1pt} t + \varphi } \right){\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt}$

(21)

由屈曲模态确定的缺陷分布形式是板结构最有可能发生的屈曲形式，能够很好地确定结构的缺陷敏感性^[18]。对于复合材料板在制造过程中出现的初始几何缺陷，引入屈曲模态的 $\varepsilon$ 倍变形作为初始几何缺陷^[19]，可以表示为

${w_1}\left( {x,y} \right) = \varepsilon {R_{ij}}\left[ {\sin \frac{{i{\text{π}}x }}{{{L_{{\rm{cr}}}}}} + \frac{i}{{i + 1}}\sin \frac{{\left( {i + 1} \right){\text{π}} x}}{{{L_{{\rm{cr}}}}}}} \right]\sin \frac{{j{\text{π}} {{y}}}}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt}$

(22)

式中：i、j为屈曲模态阶数， $i,j = 1,2,3, \cdots$ ；R_ij为板的第(i, j)阶模态幅值； $\varepsilon$ 表示初始几何缺陷系数。

根据式(21)和式(22)，利用棣莫弗公式对控制方程式(20)中的各项进行求导并化简，得到

$\begin{split} &{D_{11}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)^4}\left[ {{i^4} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^4}} \right]\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \left( {2{D_{12}} + 4{D_{66}}} \right){\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^2}\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \\ &2{D_{22}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^4}\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) - {N_{\rm{t}}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]\left[ {\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \varepsilon } \right] + 2{I_0}{\omega ^2}\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \\ &{I_2}{\omega ^2}\left\{ {{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right] + 2{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)}^2}} \right\}\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) = 0 \end{split}$

(23)

根据式(23)可以得到N的表达式

$\begin{split} N{\rm{ = }}&\left\{ {{D_{11}}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^4}\left[ {{i^4} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^4}} \right] + \left( {2{D_{12}} + 4{D_{66}}} \right){{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)}^2}} \right. + 2{D_{22}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^4} + 2{I_0}{\omega ^2} + \\ &{\left.{I_2}{\omega ^2}\left\{ {{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right] + 2{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)}^2}} \right\}\right\}} \displaystyle\frac{{\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right)}}{{{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]\left[ {\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \varepsilon } \right]}} \end{split}$

(24)

板发生屈曲时，临界条件为 $\omega = 0$ ^[20]，代入式(24)可得振动屈曲临界荷载为

${N_{\rm{cr}}}{\rm{ = }}{D_{11}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)^2}\displaystyle\frac{{\left[ {{i^4} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^4}} \right]\sin \varphi }}{{\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]\left( {\sin \varphi + \varepsilon } \right)}} + \left( {2{D_{12}} + 4{D_{66}}} \right){\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^2}\displaystyle\frac{{\sin \varphi}}{{\left( {\sin \varphi + \varepsilon } \right)}} + 2{D_{22}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{{j^2}{\text{π}} }}{{L_{\rm{b}}^2}}} \right)^2}L_{{\rm{cr}}}^2\displaystyle\frac{{\sin \varphi}}{{\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]\left( {\sin \varphi + \varepsilon } \right)}}$

(25)

2. 算例分析

利用MATLAB数值分析应力波未反射时初始几何缺陷、初相位、铺层角度、屈曲模态阶数、铺设厚度以及铺层层数对复合材料板振动屈曲临界荷载的影响，使用的材料参数见表1^[21]。

表 1 复合材料板参数^[21]

Table 1. Material parameters of composite plate^[21]

E₁/GPa	E₂/GPa	G₁₂/GPa	μ₁₂	L_a/m	L_b/m
140.0	8.6	5.0	0.35	0.60	0.50

下载: 导出CSV

| 显示表格

图3显示了复合材料板的模态阶数i为1、2、3，j为1时的屈曲模态。当板的x方向模态增大时，x方向的屈曲模态第一峰值增大且波数增加，而y方向的屈曲模态呈正对称分布。模态阶数的增加使板振动的屈曲模态变得更复杂。

图 3 x方向模态取值增大时板的屈曲模态

Figure 3. Buckling mode of composite plate with increasing mode value in x direction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

设置7组算例，分别以初始几何缺陷、初相位、铺层角度、x和y两个方向屈曲模态阶数、铺层层数及铺设厚度为变量进行算例分析，研究以上因素对板振动屈曲临界荷载的影响，算例参数见表2。

表 2 算例分析参数表

Table 2. Example analysis parameter table

Group	Initial defect coefficient	Order of mode		Laying angle/(°)	Initial phase	Number of layers laid	Thickness of the plate/m
Group	Initial defect coefficient	x direction	y direction	Laying angle/(°)	Initial phase	Number of layers laid	Thickness of the plate/m
A	Variable	i = 1	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	0.01
B	0.1	Variable	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	0.01
C	0.1	i =1	Variable	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	0.01
D	0.1	i =1	j = 1	Variable	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	0.01
E	0.1	i =1	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	Variable	5	0.01
F	0.1	i =1	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	Variable	0.01
G	0.1	i =1	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	Variable

下载: 导出CSV

| 显示表格

将A组数据代入式(25)中，可以得到不同初始缺陷系数对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图4所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：在应力波传播过程中，N_cr呈指数下降，分为敏感区和非敏感区。应力波在L_cr < 0.4 m区域传播时，N_cr的变化较陡峭，该区域为敏感区；应力波在L_cr > 0.4 m区域传播时，N_cr的变化趋于平缓，该区域为非敏感区，因此敏感分界点为0.4 m。当选取的初始缺陷系数增大时，临界荷载N_cr也随之增大。在敏感区，初始缺陷系数对临界荷载N_cr的影响较大，且随应力波传播呈减小趋势。此外，初始缺陷系数对非敏感区的影响较小。图4表明，初始几何缺陷系数越大，板越容易发生屈曲。

图 4 不同初始缺陷系数条件下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 4. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under different initial defect coefficients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将B组数据代入式(25)中，可以得到不同x方向模态阶数对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图5所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：当选取的x方向模态阶数增大时，临界荷载N_cr随之明显增大。在敏感区，x方向模态阶数对临界荷载N_cr的影响很大，并随应力波的传播不断减小，到达非敏感区之后影响较小并趋于稳定。图5表明，x方向模态阶数的增加会显著增大板的屈曲临界荷载。

图 5 x方向模态阶数不同时N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 5. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr with different order of modes in x direction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将C组数据代入式(25)中，可以得到不同的y方向模态阶数对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图6所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：当选取的y方向模态阶数增大时，临界荷载N_cr也随之变大。在应力波传播过程中，在敏感区y方向模态阶数对临界载荷基本没有影响，而在非敏感区有极小的影响。图6表明，y方向模态阶数的变化对板屈曲临界荷载基本没有影响。

图 6 y方向模态阶数不同时N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 6. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr with different order of modes in y direction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将D组数据代入式(25)中，得到不同铺层角度对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图7所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：在敏感区，不同的铺设角度对临界荷载N_cr的影响较大，且随应力波的传播不断减小，到达非敏感区后趋于稳定。图7表明，铺层角度小的单层板的层数越多，板的临界屈曲荷载越大，说明复合材料板的铺设角度直接影响板的屈曲临界荷载。

图 7 不同铺层角度条件下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 7. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under different laying angles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将E组数据代入式(25)中，得到不同初相位对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图8所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：振型函数的初相位越大，对应的临界荷载越大。在敏感区，振型函数的初相位对临界荷载N_cr的影响较小，且随应力波的传播不断减小；到达非敏感区之后，影响趋于平缓。图8表明，振型函数的初相位越大，板的屈曲临界荷载越大。

图 8 不同初相位条件下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 8. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under the condition of initial phase of different mode functions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将F组数据代入式(25)中，得到不同铺层层数对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图9所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：当按照不同层数铺设时，敏感区的临界荷载N_cr的变化较大，且随应力波的传播不断减小；到达非敏感区之后变化较小并趋于平缓。图9表明，对于厚度固定且对称铺设的板，当铺设层数达到7时，其屈曲荷载随层数增加趋于稳定。

图 9 不同铺层层数下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 9. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under different laying modes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将G组数据代入式(25)中，得到不同铺设厚度对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图10所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：板的铺设厚度越大，对应的临界荷载越大。在敏感区，不同的板厚对临界荷载N_cr的影响很大，且随应力波的传播不断减小，到达非敏感区后趋于稳定。图10表明，复合材料板的铺设厚度将直接决定板的屈曲临界荷载。

图 10 不同铺设厚度下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 10. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under different thicknesses

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

3. 结　论

基于Kirchhoff薄板理论和Hamilton变分原理，建立了具有初始几何缺陷的四边简支复合材料板的振动控制方程。采用伽辽金法，选取符合边界条件的振型函数求解控制方程，得到屈曲临界载荷表达式。数值计算结果表明：应力波在未发生反射前的传播过程中，复合材料板的振动屈曲临界载荷随着临界长度的增大、铺设厚度的减小、初始几何缺陷系数的增大、振型函数初相位的减小而减小；复合材料板的各层铺层角度与荷载作用方向的夹角越小，屈曲临界载荷越大，当对称铺设层数达7层时，临界荷载趋于稳定。研究结果可为工程中复合材料板的结构设计与应用提供一定的参考。

图 1 仿生蜂窝结构设计

Figure 1. Structural design of bionic honeycombs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 仿生蜂窝有限元模型

Figure 2. Finite element model of bionic honeycomb

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 网格敏感性验证

Figure 3. Sensitivity verification of element size

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 数值模拟与实验^[12]结果对比

Figure 4. Comparison of numerical simulation and experimental results^[12]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同类型蜂窝的耐撞性比较：(a) 载荷-位移曲线，(b) BHH的载荷-位移曲线，(c) PCF和SEA，(d) CFE

Figure 5. Crashworthiness comparison of different honeycombs: (a) load-displacement curve, (b) load-displacement curve of BHH, (c) PCF and SEA, (d) CFE

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 简化超折叠单元模式^[20]：(a)拉伸单元，(b)弯曲塑性铰线，(c)基本折叠单元凸缘完全压缩

Figure 6. Scheme of simplified super folding element: (a) extensional element, (b) bending hinge lines, (c) full compression of flange (basic folding element)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 仿生蜂窝单胞变形模式：(a) BHH单胞，(b) BRH单胞

Figure 7. Bionic honeycomb single cell deformation mode: (a) BHH single cell, (b) BRH single cell

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 结构基本单元分布与简化

Figure 8. Distribution and simplification of basic constitutive elements

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 基本角单元：(a) X型单元，(b) K型单元

Figure 9. Basic angle element: (a) X-shape element, (b) K-shape element

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 仿生蜂窝的载荷-位移曲线：(a) BRH，(b) BHH

Figure 10. Load-displacement curves of bionic honeycombs: (a) BRH, (b) BHH

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同壁厚下两种仿生蜂窝的耐撞参数对比

Figure 11. Crashworthiness comparison of two bionic honeycombs at different thicknesses of membrane

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 不同肋骨夹角下两种仿生蜂窝的耐撞参数对比：(a) PCF，(b) MCF，(c) SEA，(d) CFE

Figure 12. Crashworthiness comparison of two bionic honeycombs at different rib angles: (a) PCF, (b) MCF, (c) SEA, (d) CFE

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 仿生蜂窝的变形模式与应变云图：(a) BHH的变形模式，(b) BRH的变形模式，(c) BHH的等效塑性应变，(d) BRH的等效塑性应变

Figure 13. Deformation modes and equivalent plastic strain of the bionic honeycombs: (a) deformation mode of BHH, (b) deformation mode of BRH, (c) equivalent plastic strain of BHH, (d) equivalent plastic strain of BRH

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 传统蜂窝与仿生蜂窝的结构尺寸

Table 1. Structure sizes of traditional honeycombs and bionic honeycombs

Honeycomb type	RH	HH	BRH	BHH
Cross section shape
Single cell
Single cell size	D=10 mm	D=10 mm	D=10 mm, d=5 mm, a = 0.58 mm, b = 0.87 mm, $\alpha$ = 60°	D=10 mm, d=5 mm, a = 0.58 mm, b = 0.87 mm, $\alpha$ = 60°

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 数值模拟与理论预测结果对比

Table 2. Comparison of numerical simulation and theory

Structure type	t/mm	M/g	p_md/kN		Error/%
Structure type	t/mm	M/g	Sim.	Theory	Error/%
BRH	0.015	1.66	1.46	1.42	−2.74
BRH	0.030	3.31	3.91	4.02	2.81
BRH	0.045	4.97	6.57	5.99	−8.82
BRH	0.060	6.62	8.84	9.02	2.04
BRH	0.075	8.28	11.47	11.91	3.84
BRH	0.090	9.93	15.05	15.66	4.05
BHH	0.015	1.46	1.41	1.44	2.13
BHH	0.030	2.92	3.66	3.59	−1.91
BHH	0.045	4.38	6.07	6.12	0.82
BHH	0.060	5.84	8.72	8.69	−0.34
BHH	0.075	7.30	11.77	12.15	3.23
BHH	0.090	8.75	15.31	15.97	4.31

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	AKTAY L, JOHNSON A F, KRÖPLIN B H. Numerical modelling of honeycomb core crush behaviour [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2008, 75(9): 2616–2630. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.03.008
[2]	LI Z J, YANG Q S, FANG R, et al. Crushing performances of Kirigami modified honeycomb structure in three axial directions [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, 160: 107365. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107365
[3]	ASHAB A, RUAN D, LU G X, et al. Combined compression-shear behavior of aluminum honeycombs [J]. Key Engineering Materials, 2014, 626: 127–132. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.626.127
[4]	XU S Q, BEYNON J H, RUAN D, et al. Experimental study of the out-of-plane dynamic compression of hexagonal honeycombs [J]. Composite Structures, 2012, 94(8): 2326–2336. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.024
[5]	MOUSANEZHAD D, GHOSH R, AJDARI A, et al. Impact resistance and energy absorption of regular and functionally graded hexagonal honeycombs with cell wall material strain hardening [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2014, 89: 413–422. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.10.012
[6]	夏元明, 张威, 崔天宁, 等. 金属多级类蜂窝的压溃行为研究 [J]. 力学学报, 2019, 51(3): 873–883. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-434 XIA Y M, ZHANG W, CUI T N, et al. Investigation on crushing behavior of metal honeycomb-like hierarchical structures [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2019, 51(3): 873–883. doi: 10.6052/0459-1879-18-434
[7]	王海任, 李世强, 刘志芳, 等. 王莲仿生梯度蜂窝的面外压缩行为 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2020, 34(6): 064204. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20200562 WANG H R, LI S Q, LIU Z F, et al. Out-of-plane compression performance of gradient honeycomb inspired by royal water lily [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2020, 34(6): 064204. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20200562
[8]	樊喜刚, 尹西岳, 陶勇, 等. 梯度蜂窝面外动态压缩力学行为与吸能特性研究 [J]. 固体力学学报, 2015, 36(2): 114–122. FAN X G, YIN X Y, TAO Y, et al. Mechanical behavior and energy absorption of graded honeycomb materials under out-of-plane dynamic compression [J]. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics, 2015, 36(2): 114–122.
[9]	XIANG J W, DU J X. Energy absorption characteristics of bio-inspired honeycomb structure under axial impact loading [J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2017, 696: 283–289. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2017.04.044
[10]	HE Q, WANG Y H, GU H, et al. Dynamic crushing analysis of a circular honeycomb with leaf vein branched characteristic [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2021, 153: 103566. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103566
[11]	YANG X F, SUN Y X, YANG J L, et al. Out-of-plane crashworthiness analysis of bio-inspired aluminum honeycomb patterned with horseshoe mesostructure [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 125: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.01.014
[12]	HE Q, FENG J, CHEN Y J, et al. Mechanical properties of spider-web hierarchical honeycombs subjected to out-of-plane impact loading [J]. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 2020, 22(3): 771–796.
[13]	YANG X F, XI X L, PAN Q F, et al. In-plane dynamic crushing of a novel circular-celled honeycomb nested with petal-shaped mesostructure [J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 226: 111219. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111219
[14]	ZHANG D H, FEI Q G, ZHANG P W. In-plane dynamic crushing behavior and energy absorption of honeycombs with a novel type of multi-cells [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 117: 199–210. doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.028
[15]	ZHANG Y, LU M H, WANG C H, et al. Out-of-plane crashworthiness of bio-inspired self-similar regular hierarchical honeycombs [J]. Composite Structures, 2016, 144: 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.014
[16]	YIN H F, HUANG X F, SCARPA F, et al. In-plane crashworthiness of bio-inspired hierarchical honeycombs [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 192: 516–527. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.050
[17]	QIAO J X, CHEN C Q. In-plane crushing of a hierarchical honeycomb [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2016, 85/86: 57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.003
[18]	ZHANG X, ZHANG H, WEN Z Z. Experimental and numerical studies on the crush resistance of aluminum honeycombs with various cell configurations [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 66: 48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.009
[19]	CHEN B C, ZOU M, LIU G M, et al. Experimental study on energy absorption of bionic tubes inspired by bamboo structures under axial crushing [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 115: 48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.01.005
[20]	WIERZBICKI T, ABRAMOWICZ W. On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1983, 50(4a): 727–734. doi: 10.1115/1.3167137
[21]	ZHANG X, ZHANG H. Axial crushing of circular multi-cell columns [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 65: 110–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.12.002
[22]	TRAN T, HOU S J, HAN X, et al. Crushing analysis and numerical optimization of angle element structures under axial impact loading [J]. Composite Structures, 2015, 119: 422–435. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.09.019
[23]	ZHANG Y, XU X, WANG J, et al. Crushing analysis for novel bio-inspired hierarchical circular structures subjected to axial load [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2018, 140: 407–431. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.015