基于FLACS的某城市燃气储配站气云爆炸安全评估

刘洋; 李展; 张亚栋; 陈力; 方秦

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20200595

基于FLACS的某城市燃气储配站气云爆炸安全评估

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20200595

刘洋^1,,
李展^1,*, ,,
张亚栋²,
陈力²,
方秦¹

1.
陆军工程大学爆炸冲击防灾减灾国家重点实验室，江苏南京　210007
2.
东南大学爆炸安全防护教育部工程研究中心，江苏南京　211189

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（52008392）；江苏省自然科学基金（BK20190571）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘　洋（1996－），男，硕士研究生，主要从事燃气爆炸灾害效应研究. E-mail：20145035@cqu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
李　展（1990－），男，博士，讲师，主要从事燃气爆炸灾害效应研究. E-mail：lz.9008@163.com

中图分类号: O381; X932
计量
- 文章访问数: 4711
- HTML全文浏览量: 1950
- PDF下载量: 47
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-07-22
- 修回日期: 2020-08-11

Safety Evaluation of Gas Cloud Explosions in an Urban Distribution Stations Based on FLACS

LIU Yang^1
,,
LI Zhan^{1,*
, ,},
ZHANG Yadong²,
CHEN Li²,
FANG Qin¹

1.
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation of Explosion and Impact,Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, Jiangsu, China
2.
Engineering Research Center of Safety and Protection of Explosion & Impact of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China

摘要

摘要: 随着城市的发展，位于城市边缘的燃气储配站逐渐转移到了城市中心，而储配站存在燃气泄漏爆炸的可能，给城市公共安全带来潜在的风险。基于GIS技术建立了南京某燃气储配站所在区域的几何模型，导入FLACS软件进行甲烷气云爆炸数值模拟，研究了储配站气云爆炸发展过程与荷载分布规律，讨论了气云大小、点火位置以及气云位置对爆炸超压的影响，最后根据模拟结果划出爆炸损伤范围。结果表明：将GIS技术应用于FLACS模型建立可以大大缩短建模时间并提高模型精度；当气云尺寸不小于60 m且点火位置存在明显约束或障碍时，点火后可能产生爆燃；气云位于储罐西南侧时将造成大范围的人员轻伤和建筑物轻微损坏，并造成一定范围的人员重伤和建筑物的严重损坏；为避免气云爆炸产生严重后果，储配站附近应尽量减少高大密集的建筑群。
- 气云爆炸 /
- FLACS /
- 储配站 /
- 地理信息系统 /
- 安全评估
Abstract: There is a possibility of gas leakage during the operation of gas distribution stations. The flammable gas mixture generated by the leaked gases may result in explosion accident and bring about great hazards to the public safety. Based on geographic information system (GIS) technology, the geometric model of urban block around a gas distribution station in Nanjing was established and imported in the CFD software FLACS to simulate the gas cloud explosion. The development process and overpressure distribution of gas cloud explosion around the gas distribution station under typical working conditions were revealed. The influences of gas cloud size, ignition position and gas cloud position on the explosion overpressure were discussed. In addition, the damage level of the gas cloud explosion was discussed based on the numerical predictions. The results show that the application of GIS technology can improve the accuracy and efficiency of the model significantly. When the size of gas cloud is larger than 60 m and with obvious restrictions or obstacles in the ignition position, gas deflagration may occur. When the gas cloud is located on the southwest side of the gasholder, the explosion will cause a wide range of minor injuries (damage) to people (buildings), and cause a certain range of serious injuries (damage) to people (buildings). In order to avoid the serious consequences of gas cloud explosion, the existence of tall and dense buildings near the gas distribution station should be avoided.
- gas cloud explosion /
- FLACS /
- gas distribution station /
- geographicinformationsystem (GIS) /
- safety evaluation

HTML全文

图 1 储配站周围重要建筑物分布

Figure 1. Important buildings around the gas distribution station

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 储配站区域航拍图与几何模型

Figure 2. Aerial photograph and geometric model of gas distribution station area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 储配站数值模型

Figure 3. Numerical model of gas distribution station area

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 压力测点分布

Figure 4. Positions of pressure gauges

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同气云尺寸（工况1～工况3）

Figure 5. Different sizes of gas clouds (Case 1−Case 3)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同气云位置（工况1，工况6～工况8）

Figure 6. Different locations of gas clouds (Case 1, Case 6−Case 8)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 超压时程曲线（工况1）

Figure 7. Overpressure-time histories of Case 1

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 气云爆炸火焰形状（工况1）

Figure 8. Flame shapes of gas explosion (Case 1)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 工况1最大超压分布云图（3～25 kPa）

Figure 9. Contour of maximum overpressure for Case 1 (3−25kPa)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 测点P2超压时程曲线（工况1～工况3）

Figure 10. Overpressure-time histories of pressure sensor P2 (Case 1−Case 3)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 最大超压时刻气云爆炸火焰形状（工况1～工况3）

Figure 11. Flame shapes of gas explosion (Case 1−Case 3)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 测点P2超压时程曲线（工况1，工况4～工况7）

Figure 12. Pressure-time curves of pressure sensor P2 (Case 1, Case 4−Case 7)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 气云爆炸火焰形状（工况4）

Figure 13. Characteristics of the flame shape of gas explosion (Case 4)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 气云爆炸火焰形状（工况5和工况6）

Figure 14. Characteristics of the flame shape of gas explosion (Case 5 and Case 6)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 气云爆炸火焰形状（工况7）

Figure 15. Characteristics of the flame shape of gas explosion (Case 7)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 最大超压分布云图（工况1，工况8～工况10）

Figure 16. Contours of maximum overpressure distribution (Case 1, Case 8−Case 10)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 人员轻伤范围 (20~40 kPa)

Figure 17. Range of minor wound (20−40 kPa)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 人员中伤和重伤范围

Figure 18. Range of secondary wound and severe wound

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 19 建筑物轻微损坏范围 (3~10 kPa)

Figure 19. Ranges of building minor damage (3−10kPa)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 20 建筑物轻度损坏范围 (10～30 kPa)

Figure 20. Ranges of building mild damage(10−30 kPa)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 21 建筑物中度和严重损坏范围

Figure 21. Ranges of secondary damage and badly damage

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 压力测点布局

Table 1. Positions of pressure sensors

Serial number of pressure sensors	Buildings	Descriptions
P1, P2	Office building	Important high-rise building
P3	Residential building	Important high-rise building
P4	Children’s hall	Important building
P5	Nursery school	Important building
P6	Shopping mall	Potential crowded area
P7	Gas station	Important building

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 气云爆炸模拟工况

Table 2. Cases considered in the numerical simulations

Case No.	Gas cloud size	Ignition location	Gas cloud location
1	90 m × 90 m × 90 m	Center of bottom area	Close to the gasholder
2	60 m × 60 m × 60 m	Center of bottom area	Close to the gasholder
3	30 m × 30 m × 30 m	Center of bottom area	Close to the gasholder
4	90 m × 90 m × 90 m	Center of gas cloud	Close to the gasholder
5	90 m × 90 m × 90 m	Southwest corner of bottom area	Close to the gasholder
6	90 m × 90 m × 90 m	Southeast corner of bottom area	Close to the gasholder
7	90 m × 90 m × 90 m	Northeast corner of bottom area	Close to the gasholder
8	90 m × 90 m × 90 m	Center of bottom area	Northwest side
9	90 m × 90 m × 90 m	Center of bottom area	West side
10	90 m × 90 m × 90 m	Center of bottom area	Southwest side

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 爆炸超压对人员和建筑物的伤害^[46]

Table 3. Damage level of personnel and buildings under explosion overpressure^[46]

Damage level of personnel	Overpressure/kPa	Damage level of buildings	Overpressure/kPa
Safe	< 20	Minor damage	3−10
Minor wound	20−40	Mild damage	10−30
Secondary wound	30−50	Secondary damage	30−50
Severe wound	50−100	Badly damaged	50−80
Death	> 100	Completely damaged	> 80

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(46)

[1]	马秋菊, 张奇, 庞磊. 甲烷-空气最小点火能量预测理论模型 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2012, 26(3): 301–305. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2012.03.009 MA Q J, ZHANG Q, PANG L. Theoretical model of minimum ignition energy prediction for methane-air mixture [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2012, 26(3): 301–305. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2012.03.009
[2]	孙晓平, 朱渊, 陈国明, 等. 国内外LNG罐区燃爆事故分析及防控措施建议 [J]. 天然气工业, 2013, 33(5): 126–131. SUN X P, ZHU Y, CHEN G M, et al. An analysis of foreign and domestic explosion accidents in LNG tank fields and proposals for preventing measures [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(5): 126–131.
[3]	ZHANG Q T, ZHOU G, HU Y Y, et al. Risk evaluation and analysis of a gas tank explosion based on a vapor cloud explosion model: a case study [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 101.
[4]	李琦. 燃气储配站危险有害因素识别 [C]//2016中国燃气运营与安全研讨会论文集. 大连: 中国土木工程学会燃气分会, 2016: 544−548. LI Q. Identification of dangerous and harmful factors in gas storage and distribution stations [C]//2016 Proceedings of China Gas Operation and Safety Seminar. Dalian: Gas Branch of China Civil Engineering, 2016: 544−548.
[5]	王建. 储罐区可燃气体泄漏扩散模拟及爆燃灾害评估 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2013. WANG J. Numerical simulation for the leakage diffusion of combustible gas and explosion hazards assessment in tank area [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2013.
[6]	张萌, 胡定煜, 舒中俊. CNG储气井泄漏导致火灾及爆炸事故风险分析与对策研究 [J]. 防灾科技学院学报, 2013, 15(2): 30–35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8047.2013.02.007 ZHANG M, HU D Y, SHU Z J. Risk analysis and countermeasure research of leakage fire and explosion accidents in CNG storage wells [J]. Journal of Institute of Disaster Preventi, 2013, 15(2): 30–35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8047.2013.02.007
[7]	陈晓坤, 李鑫, 王秋红, 等. 乙烯球罐区多源泄漏爆炸数值仿真 [J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2019, 39(6): 957–964. CHEN X K, LI X, WANG Q H, et al. Numerical simulation of multi-source leakage explosion in ethylene tank area [J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2019, 39(6): 957–964.
[8]	安春晖. 某CNG加气站的火灾爆炸危险性评价 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2014, 33(7): 828–832. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2014.07.032 AN C H. The fire and explosion risk analysis of a CNG station [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2014, 33(7): 828–832. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2014.07.032
[9]	张川. 蒸气云爆炸模型在天然气爆炸中的应用 [J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2017, 37(9): 62–63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2017.09.030 ZHANG C. Application of steam cloud explosion model in natural gas explosion [J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2017, 37(9): 62–63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2017.09.030
[10]	孟亦飞, 蒋军成. 气云爆炸对厂区平面布局的影响分析 [J]. 石油化工高等学校学报, 2008(1): 60–65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-396X.2008.01.015 MENG Y F, JIANG J C. Gas explosion’s influence on plant layout [J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2008(1): 60–65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-396X.2008.01.015
[11]	丛立新. 气云爆燃压力场与冲量场实验与数值模拟[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2008. CONG L X. Experiment and simulation on pressure and impulse field of gas cloud deflagration [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2008.
[12]	毕明树. 开敞空间可燃气云爆炸的压力场研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2001. BI M S. A research on the pressure fields of unconfined flammable gas cloud explosions [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2001.
[13]	邵卫. 开敞空间可燃气云爆炸研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2002. SHAO W. A study on explosion of combustible gas cloud in open space [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2002.
[14]	曾岳梅, 凌晓东. LNG接收站蒸气云爆炸数值模拟分析 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2013, 32(8): 834–837. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2013.08.005 ZENG Y M, LING X D. Numerical simulation of vapor cloud explosion in LNG receiving terminal [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2013, 32(8): 834–837. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2013.08.005
[15]	凌晓东. 槽车装卸区泄漏爆炸CFD模拟研究 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2018, 37(9): 1282–1286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2018.09.038 LING X D. CFD simulation on leakage and explosion accident of truck loading station [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2018, 37(9): 1282–1286. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2018.09.038
[16]	王学岐, 韩兆辉, 宋丹青. 基于CFD的液化气罐区泄漏爆炸事故后果模拟 [J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2013, 9(2): 64–68. WANG X Q, HAN Z H, SONG D Q. Simulation on leakage explosion consequence of LPG tank farms based on CFD [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2013, 9(2): 64–68.
[17]	李静媛, 赵永志, 郑津洋. 加氢站高压氢气泄漏爆炸事故模拟及分析 [J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2015, 49(7): 1389–1394. LI J Y, ZHAO Y Z, ZHENG J Y. Simulation and analysis on leakage and explosion of high pressure hydrogen in hydrogen refueling station [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2015, 49(7): 1389–1394.
[18]	罗艾民, 贾宝硖, 吴昊, 等. 工厂三维建模及其事故模拟 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2010, 20(1): 31–35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2010.01.005 LUO A M, JIA B X, WU H, et al. Three-dimensional modeling of factories and its accident numerical simulation [J]. China Safety Science Journal (CSSJ), 2010, 20(1): 31–35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2010.01.005
[19]	王志寰, 李成兵, 周宁. 大型LNG接收站泄漏事故灾害效应分析与预测 [J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(5): 145–153. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.05.018 WANG Z H, LI C B, ZHOU N. Analysis and prediction on the disaster effect of leakage accidents at large LNG receiving stations [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(5): 145–153. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.05.018
[20]	徐大用, 蒋会春, 姜威, 等. 基于FLACS的汽油槽车运输泄漏爆炸事故数值模拟研究 [J]. 常州大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 31(4): 16–25. XU D Y, JIANG H C, JIANG W, et al. CFD Simulation of gasoline tanker transportation explosion using FLACS [J]. Journal of Changzhou University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 31(4): 16–25.
[21]	韦善阳, 王川, 胡庆革. 油罐泄漏爆炸影响范围研究 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2015, 34(1): 22–25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2015.01.007 WEI S Y, WANG C, HU Q G. Study on influence range of oil tank explosion [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2015, 34(1): 22–25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2015.01.007
[22]	马庆春, 张博. 基于ALOHA的城市燃气管道泄漏火灾爆炸影响区域的数值模拟 [J]. 安全与环境工程, 2016, 23(2): 75–79. MA Q C, ZHANG B. Numerical simulation of fire & explosion-affected areas caused by the urban natural gas pipeline leakage based on ALOHA [J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2016, 23(2): 75–79.
[23]	ZHANG Y, JIA Y, WANG S Y. Development and application of GIS module in NCCHE modeling system [C]//World Environmental and Water Resources Congress-2011. Palm Springs, CA, 2011: 1934−1942.
[24]	章博, 陈国明, 孔令圳. 一种真实地形计算流体力学网格生成方法 [J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(5): 104–108. ZHANG B, CHEN G M, KONG L Z. A method for computational fluid dynamics grids formation on complex terrain [J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2011, 35(5): 104–108.
[25]	张立. 耦合CFD与GIS在城市燃气三维动态泄漏扩散中的应用研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2015. ZHANG L. Application research of city gas 3D dynamic leakage and diffusion coupled with CFD and GIS [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2015.
[26]	WONG D W, CAMELLI F, SONWALKAR M. Integrating computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models with GIS: an evaluation on data conversion formats [C]//Geoinformatics 2007: Geospatial Information Science, International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2007, 6753: 675312.
[27]	ROELOFS J G J. Development and application of urban CFD models based on GIS data for analysis of urban wind flow and heat transfer [D]. Eindhoven: Eindhoven University of Technology, 2011.
[28]	CHU A K M, KWOK R C W, YU K N. Study of pollution dispersion in urban areas using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and Geographic Information System (GIS) [J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2005, 20(3): 273–277.
[29]	成竞. 基于CFD的居民小区流场与空气污染数值模拟[D].上海: 复旦大学, 2012. CHENG J. Using CFD software to simulate wind environment and air pollution dispersion in residential districts [D]. Shanghai: Fudan University, 2012.
[30]	孙洁. 室外管道燃气泄漏扩散模拟与可视化研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2012. SUN J. Outdoor pipeline gas leakage diffusion and visualization simulation research [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2012.
[31]	张立. 耦合GIS与CFD应用潜力与面临挑战的探讨 [J]. 科技视界, 2014(29): 162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2457.2014.29.123 ZHANG L. Application potential and challenges of coupled GIS and CFD [J]. Science & Technology Vision, 2014(29): 162. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-2457.2014.29.123
[32]	席明军. 基于CFD和GIS的城市燃气管道泄漏扩散模拟研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2016. XI M J. CFD and GIS based urban gas pipeline leakage diffusion simulation study [D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
[33]	缪鹏飞, 刘道明, 田欣. GIS的LPG储罐爆炸后果模拟及应急处置 [J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 35(9): 926–930. doi: 10.11956/j.issn.1008-0562.2016.09.006 MIAO P F, LIU D M, TIAN X. Simulation analysis of LPG tank explosion based on GIS and its application in emergency disposal [J]. Journal of Liaoning Technical University (Natural Science), 2016, 35(9): 926–930. doi: 10.11956/j.issn.1008-0562.2016.09.006
[34]	付珍. 基于GIS的城市燃气管道事故后果分析[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2012. FU Z. The consequence analysis of urban gas pipeline accident based on GIS [D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2012.
[35]	李天祺, 赵振东, 余世舟. 基于GIS的爆炸灾害数值模拟与应急损失评估 [J]. 灾害学, 2010, 25(3): 96–99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2010.03.020 LI T Q, ZHAO Z D, YU S Z. GIS-based numerical simulation and emergency loss evaluation of explosion disasters [J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2010, 25(3): 96–99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-811X.2010.03.020
[36]	GEXCON A S. FLACS v10. 8 user’s manual [Z]. Bergen, Norway: GEXCON AS, 2017.
[37]	翟良云, 赵祥迪, 袁纪武, 等. 石化行业控制室承爆风险评估方法研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2009, 19(6): 129–134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2009.06.020 ZHAI L Y, ZHAO X D, YUAN J W, et al. Study on explosion risk assessment method for control room in petrochemical industry [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2009, 19(6): 129–134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2009.06.020
[38]	王福军. 计算流体动力学分析[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2004: 9. WANG F J. Computational fluid dynamics analysis [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2004: 9.
[39]	LAUNDER B E, SPALDING D B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1974, 3(2): 269–289. doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
[40]	张慧. 基于生态服务功能的南京市生态安全格局研究[D]. 南京: 南京师范大学, 2016. ZHANG H. Research on ecological security pattern of Nanjing based on ecological service function [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Normal University, 2016.
[41]	潘旭海. 燃烧爆炸理论及应用[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2015. PAN X H. Theory and application of combustion explosion [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2015.
[42]	BJERKETVEDT D, BAKKE J R, VAN WINGERDEN K. Gas explosion handbook [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1997, 52(1): 1–150. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(97)81620-2
[43]	刘彦. 爆炸物理学[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社有限责任公司, 2019. LIU Y. Explosion physics [M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press Co., Ltd., 2019.
[44]	BAO Q, FANG Q, YANG S G, et al. Experimental investigation on the deflagration load under unconfined methane-air explosions [J]. Fuel, 2016, 185: 565–576. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.126
[45]	孙博. 开敞空间可燃气云爆炸研究[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2000. SUN B. A study on explosion of combustible gas cloud in open space [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2000.
[46]	张云明. 气体爆炸原理与防治技术[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2018. ZHANG Y M. Principle and control technology of gas explosion [M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2018.