聚脲涂覆钢复合结构的抗爆效应

王琪; 贾子健; 赵鹏铎; 王志军; 张鹏; 徐豫新

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20200545

聚脲涂覆钢复合结构的抗爆效应

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20200545

王琪^1,,
贾子健^2,*, ,,
赵鹏铎¹,
王志军³,
张鹏^{1, 3},
徐豫新^{4, 5, 6}

1.
海军研究院，北京　100161
2.
瞬态冲击技术重点实验室，北京　102202
3.
中北大学机电工程学院，山西太原　030051
4.
北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室，北京　100081
5.
北京理工大学重庆创新中心，重庆　401120
6.
北京理工大学高能量密度材料教育部重点实验室，北京　100081

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11302259, 11402027）

详细信息

作者简介:
王　琪（1987－），女，博士，工程师，主要从事舰船爆炸毁伤和防护技术研究. E-mail：406024194@qq.com

通讯作者:
贾子健（1992－），男，硕士，工程师，主要从事终点杀伤技术和防护技术研究. E-mail：zjjr116@163.com

中图分类号: O389
计量
- 文章访问数: 7262
- HTML全文浏览量: 3457
- PDF下载量: 69
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-04-11
- 修回日期: 2020-05-02
- 刊出日期: 2020-07-25

Anti-Explosion Effect of Polyurea Coated Steel Composite Structures

WANG Qi^1
,,
JIA Zijian^{2,*
, ,},
ZHAO Pengduo¹,
WANG Zhijun³,
ZHANG Peng^{1, 3},
XU Yuxin^{4, 5, 6}

1.
Naval Academy of Armament, Beijing 100161, China
2.
Science and Technology on Transient Impact Laboratory, Beijing 102202, China
3.
School of Mechatronics Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, China
4.
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
5.
Beijing Institute of Technology Chongqing Innovation Center, Chongqing 401120, China
6.
Key Laboratory of High Energy Density Materials of Ministry of Education, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究不同涂覆方式下聚脲涂覆钢复合结构的抗爆性能及聚脲涂层的吸能机理。针对等面密度、等钢板厚度的无涂覆、迎爆面涂覆和背爆面涂覆3种结构，分别开展抗40和60 g TNT爆炸加载试验。通过对比复合结构破坏模式，分析聚脲涂层对复合结构抗爆性能的影响以及聚脲涂层防护机理。研究表明：等面密度条件下，迎爆面涂覆聚脲涂层不能提高复合结构的抗爆性能；等钢板厚度条件下，聚脲涂层可以提高复合结构的抗爆性能，且背爆面涂覆效果最佳；聚脲涂覆钢板复合结构的抗爆性能与聚脲涂层的本构弥散、界面弥散以及热软化效应等相关。
- 聚脲涂层 /
- 切线模量 /
- 递减硬化 /
- 软化效应
Abstract: In order to investigate the antiknock performance of polyurea coated steel composite structures and the energy absorption mechanism of polyurea coatings, the 40 and 60 g TNT explosion loading tests were carried out for the uncoated, equal-face coating and back-explosion coating structures with equal surface density and other steel plate thicknesses. Then the polyurea coatings’ effects on the antiknock performance of composite structures and their protective mechanism were analyzed in comparison of the failure modes of composite plates. It was found that the anti-explosion performance decreases with the thickening polyurea coating for the composite structure with uniform surface density, while improves under the same steel plate thickness conditions. In addition, coating on the rear surface proves to be the best. It was also shown that the antiknock performance of polyurea-coated steel composite structures is closely related to the characteristics of constitutive dispersion, interface dispersion and softening effect of the polyurea protective coating.
- polyuria coating /
- Tangent modulus /
- decreasing hardening /
- softening effect

HTML全文

图 1 靶板结构尺寸

Figure 1. Dimensions of target plate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 靶板实物

Figure 2. Target board

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 试验工装布置

Figure 3. Test tooling arrangement

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 准静态测试时聚脲材料切线模量的变化趋势

Figure 4. Trend of tangent modulus of polyurea materials under quasi-static tests

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 动态测试时聚脲材料切线模量的变化趋势

Figure 5. Trend of tangent modulus of polyurea materials under dynamic tests

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 靶板变形及破坏情况

Figure 6. Deformation and failure of targets

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 球形冲击波载荷

Figure 7. Spherical shock wave loading

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 靶板变形及破坏情况

Figure 8. Deformation and failure of targets

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 箱体变形

Figure 9. Deformation and failure of boxes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 聚脲试样微观结构

Figure 10. Microstructure of polyurea sample

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 静爆试验工况

Table 1. Experimental conditions

Shot No.	Condition	Charge mass/g	Collapse distance/mm	Steel plate thickness/mm	Coating thickness/mm	Coating position
01	Same areal density	40	50	2.0
02		40	50	1.5	4.0	Front face
03		40	50	1.2	6.0	Front face
04	Same thickness of steel plate	60	50	1.2
05		60	50	1.2	6.0	Front face
06		60	50	1.2	6.0	Back face

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(15)

[1]	黄阳洋. 聚脲涂层复合结构抗破片侵彻机理研究 [D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2018. HUANG Y Y. Study on mechanism of anti-fragment penetration of polyurea coated composite structure [D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2018.
[2]	孙静, 陈酒姜, 卢敏, 等. 聚脲在美国海军舰船上的应用 [J]. 现代涂料与涂装, 2009, 12(3): 57–60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9548.2009.03.021 SUN J, CHEN J J, LU M, et al. Application of polyurea on US Navy ships [J]. Modern Paint & Finishing, 2009, 12(3): 57–60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9548.2009.03.021
[3]	王殿玺, 郭香华, 张庆明. 聚脲涂覆钢板在爆炸载荷作用下的动态响应 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2019, 33(2): 024103. WANG D X, GUO X H, ZHANG Q M. Dynamic response of polyurea coated steel plate under blast loading [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(2): 024103.
[4]	高照, 李永清, 侯海量, 等. 聚脲涂层复合结构抗侵彻机理实验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2019, 33(2): 025102. GAO Z, LI Y Q, HOU H L, et al. Penetration mechanism of polyurea coating composite structure [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(2): 025102.
[5]	甘云丹, 宋力, 杨黎明. 弹性体涂覆钢板抗冲击性能的数值模拟 [J]. 兵工学报, 2009, 30(Suppl 2): 15–18. GAN Y D, SONG L, YANG L M. Numerical simulation for anti-blast performances of steel plate coated with elastomer [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2009, 30(Suppl 2): 15–18.
[6]	AMINI M R, SIMON J, NEMAT-NASSER S. Numerical modeling of effect of polyurea on response of steel plates to impulse loads in direct pressure-pulse experiments [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2010, 42(6): 615–627. doi: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.09.009
[7]	ROTARIU A, BUCUR F, TOADER G, et al. Experimental study on polyurea coating effects on deformation of metallic plates subjected to air blast loads [J]. Materiale Plastice, 2016, 53(4): 670–674.
[8]	WANG J G, REN H Q, WU X Y, et al. Blast response of polymer-retrofitted masonry unit walls [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 128: 174–181. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.044
[9]	王小伟, 何金迎, 祖旭东, 等. 聚脲弹性体复合夹层结构的防爆性能 [J]. 工程塑料应用, 2017, 45(5): 63–68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3539.2017.05.012 WANG X W, HE J Y, ZU X D, et al. Antidetonation properties on composite sandwich structure with polyurea elastomer [J]. Engineering Plastics Application, 2017, 45(5): 63–68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3539.2017.05.012
[10]	张鹏, 王志军, 赵鹏铎, 等. 聚脲弹性体涂覆结构抗侵性能与层间作用机制研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2019, 39(4): 337–342, 358. ZHANG P, WANG Z J, ZHAO P D, et al. Penetration resistance and layers mutual effect of polyurea coated structures [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2019, 39(4): 337–342, 358.
[11]	杨冬梅. 板壳结构在冲击载荷作用下的破坏机理研究 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2004. YANG D M. The destroy mechanism study of plate structure under shock load [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2004.
[12]	许帅. 聚脲弹性体复合结构抗冲击防护性能研究 [D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2015. XU S. The impact resistance study of polyurea composite structures [D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2015.
[13]	王飞, 陈卫东. 爆炸冲击载荷作用下板壳结构数值仿真分析 [J]. 强度与环境, 2010, 37(4): 36–39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3919.2010.04.006 WANG F, CHEN W D. The numerical simulation analysis of the shell structure subjected to contact explosion [J]. Structure & Environment Engineering, 2010, 37(4): 36–39. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3919.2010.04.006
[14]	张铁军. 板壳结构在爆炸载荷作用下的破坏分析 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2005. ZHANG T J. The destroy study of plate structure under explosive loading [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2005.
[15]	赵鹏铎, 张鹏, 张磊, 等. 聚脲涂覆钢板结构抗爆性能试验研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2018, 38(2): 118–123. ZHAO P D, ZHANG P, ZHANG L, et al. Experimental investigation on the performance of polyure-coated structure under blast loads [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2018, 38(2): 118–123.