陶瓷材料宏观动态新本构模型

唐瑞涛; 徐柳云; 文鹤鸣; 王子豪

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20190863

A Macroscopic Dynamic Constitutive Model for Ceramic Materials

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190863

CAS Key Laboratory for Mechanical Behavior and Design of Materials, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China

More Information

Author Bio:
TANG Ruitao (1989－), male, doctoral student, major in impact dynamics. E-mail: rttang@mail.ustc.edu.cn

Corresponding author: WEN Heming (1965－), male, Ph.D, professor, major in impact dynamics. E-mail: hmwen@ustc.edu.cn

摘要

Abstract: A macroscopic constitutive model is presented herein for ceramic materials subjected to dynamic loadings by closely following a previous study on concrete. The equation of state is described by a polynomial equation and the strength model takes into account various effects such as pressure hardening, Lode angle, strain rate, shear damage and tensile softening. In particular, the strength surface of ceramic materials is characterized by a new function which levels out at very high pressures and strain rate effect is taken into account by dynamic increase factor (DIF) which excludes inertial effect. The present model is verified against some available experimental data for ceramic materials in terms of pressure-volumetric response, quasi-static strength surface and strain rate effect. The model is further verified against the data for triaxial test by single element simulation approach and the test data for depth of penetration in AD99.5/RHA struck by tungsten alloy penetrators. Furthermore, comparisons are also made between numerical results of the present model and the JH-2 model. It is demonstrated that the present model can be employed to describe the mechanical behavior of ceramic materials under different loading conditions with reasonable confidence and is advantageous over the existing model.
- ceramic material /
- constitutive model /
- stain rate effect /
- triaxial test /
- JH-2 model /
- single element simulation approach
摘要: 基于已有混凝土材料的相关研究，建立了陶瓷材料在动态载荷作用下的宏观本构模型。模型中状态方程采用多项式描述，强度面模型中考虑了压力相关性、Lode角效应、应变率效应、剪切损伤及拉伸软化等的影响。采用一个新的函数来描述陶瓷材料的强度面，其在较高压力下趋于一个平台值；并采用动态增强因子（DIF）考察剥除惯性效应后陶瓷材料的真实应变率效应。通过将模型预测的压力-体应变响应、准静态强度面以及应变率效应与相关实验数据进行对比，验证了该模型。单个单元测试模拟得到的结果与三轴实验数据以及侵彻实验数据高度吻合，进一步验证了此模型。为显示模型的优越性，还与JH-2模型的预测结果进行了比较。结果表明：所提出的本构模型能够很好地预测陶瓷材料在不同加载条件下的力学行为，且优于现有的模型。
- 陶瓷材料 /
- 本构模型 /
- 应变率效应 /
- 三轴实验 /
- JH-2模型 /
- 单单元测试

HTML全文

复合材料板具有较高的强度质量比、良好的耐腐蚀性和优异的可设计性，被广泛应用于航空航天和工业制造等领域^[1]。在实际使用中复合材料板经常受到不同形式的冲击荷载，从而产生振动和屈曲问题，因此冲击载荷作用下复合材料板的动力稳定性问题备受关注。

近年来关于复合材料板的研究越来越多，尤其是冲击荷载作用下复合材料板的动力稳定性问题研究^[2]，对工程部件结构设计和使用具有重要的意义。Sun等^[3]研究了在加热环境中应力波对功能梯度圆柱壳轴向冲击屈曲的影响；毛柳伟等^[4]对弹性直杆在应力波作用下的动力分叉屈曲进行了分析与探讨，提出了求解应力波作用下直杆动力屈曲的数值方法；Lepik^[5]讨论了在应力波影响下轴向压缩的弹塑性梁的屈曲；Zhang等^[6]分析了不确定初始几何缺陷对薄板屈曲的影响；Abdelaziz等^[7]利用双曲线剪切变形理论，分析了在各种边界条件下复合材料板的弯曲变形和屈曲；Kouchakzadeh等^[8]采用线性和旋转弹簧的均匀分布来模拟边界条件，对矩形层压复合板的屈曲进行了分析；Czapski等^[9]通过数值和实验方法，研究了残余应力对压缩至破坏期间薄壁层压板屈曲性能的影响。

在实际工程中，复合材料板多应用于振动环境，其在动力响应下的动态特性和振动分析是必不可少的，因而对该类材料的振动屈曲研究至关重要。Kuo^[10]研究了两种非均匀分布纤维复合材料板的振动屈曲问题，Villarreal等^[11]对典型正交异性板的本征频率和振动屈曲进行了理论分析，Eftekhari等^[12]提出了通过组合应用有限元方法和微分正交方法求解矩形板的振动屈曲问题，Rehman等^[13]探讨了壳体结构的缺陷和损坏对结构振动屈曲的影响，Sayyad等^[14]将三角剪切变形理论应用于复合板的变形和振动屈曲研究。

关于复合材料板的振动屈曲问题已开展了较多的研究，但大多未考虑应力波效应对振动屈曲的影响，而动力屈曲一般与应力波相联系且具有局部发生的特点，研究含初始缺陷的复合材料板能更好地揭示实际工程中复合材料板在不同工况下发生动力屈曲的机理。基于此，本研究利用Kirchhoff薄板理论和Hamilton原理，考虑应力波效应，建立含初始几何缺陷的四边简支复合材料板的振动控制方程，得到板的屈曲临界荷载表达式，在此基础上通过数值计算讨论初始几何缺陷、振型函数初相位、铺层角度、屈曲模态阶数和铺层层数对复合材料板振动屈曲临界荷载的影响，为工程实际提供理论依据。

1. 复合材料板的控制方程

复合材料板在x = L_a处为固定边界条件，其余3边为简支边界条件，在 $z$ = 0的中性面上受x方向的面内阶跃荷载N作用，如图1所示。板在 $z$ 方向上含初始几何缺陷w₁，且x、y、 $z$ 方向的位移分别为u、v、w。复合材料板的长度、宽度和厚度分别为L_a、L_b、h，由n层单层板组成， $\theta$ 为单层板的铺层角度，即纤维材料铺设方向与x方向的夹角（见图1）。

图 1 复合材料板结构示意图

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of composite plate structure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

根据Kirchhoff薄板理论及经典弹性理论，复合材料板的位移与应变、弹性曲面的曲率和扭率的表达式为

${\begin{cases} {w = {w_1} + {w_0}} \\ {u = {u_0} - z\displaystyle\frac{{\partial \left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial x}}} \\ {v = {v_0} - z\displaystyle\frac{{\partial \left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial y}}} \end{cases}}$

(1)

${\begin{cases} {\varepsilon _x^0 = \displaystyle\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial x}}} \\ {\varepsilon _y^0 = \displaystyle\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial y}}} \\ {\gamma _{xy}^0 = \displaystyle\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial y}} + \displaystyle\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial x}}} \end{cases}}$

(2)

${\begin{cases} {{\kappa _x} = - \displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}\left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \\ {{\kappa _y} = - \displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}\left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial {y^2}}}} \\ {{\kappa _{xy}} = - \displaystyle\frac{{2{\partial ^2}\left( {w - {w_1}} \right)}}{{\partial x\partial y}}} \end{cases}}$

(3)

${\begin{cases} {{\varepsilon _x} = \varepsilon _x^0 + z{\kappa _x}} \\ {{\varepsilon _y} = \varepsilon _y^0 + z{\kappa _y}} \\ {{\gamma _{xy}} = \gamma _{_{xy}}^0 + z{\kappa _{xy}}} \end{cases}}$

(4)

式中：u₀、v₀、w₀分别为复合材料板在x、y、 $z$ 方向上的中面位移， $\varepsilon _x^0$ 、 $\varepsilon _y^0$ 、 $\gamma _{xy}^0$ 分别为复合材料板中面应变分量， ${\kappa _x}$ 、 ${\kappa _y}$ 、 ${\kappa _{xy}}$ 为中面的曲率和扭率， ${\varepsilon _x}$ 、 ${\varepsilon _y}$ 、 ${\gamma _{xy}}$ 为复合材料板任意一点的应变。

板的内力（N_x、N_y、N_xy）与内力矩（M_x、M_y、M_xy）之间的关系为

$\left[ \begin{array}{l} {N_x} \\ {N_y} \\ {N_{xy}} \\ {M_x} \\ {M_y} \\ {M_{xy}} \end{array} \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{A_{11}}}&{{A_{12}}}&{{A_{16}}}&{{B_{11}}}&{{B_{12}}}&{{B_{16}}} \\ {{A_{12}}}&{{A_{22}}}&{{A_{26}}}&{{B_{12}}}&{{B_{22}}}&{{B_{26}}} \\ {{A_{16}}}&{{A_{26}}}&{{A_{66}}}&{{B_{16}}}&{{B_{26}}}&{{B_{66}}} \\ {{B_{11}}}&{{B_{12}}}&{{B_{16}}}&{{D_{11}}}&{{D_{12}}}&{{D_{16}}} \\ {{B_{12}}}&{{B_{22}}}&{{B_{26}}}&{{D_{12}}}&{{D_{22}}}&{{D_{26}}} \\ {{B_{16}}}&{{B_{26}}}&{{B_{66}}}&{{D_{16}}}&{{D_{26}}}&{{D_{66}}} \end{array}} \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {\varepsilon _x^0} \\ {\varepsilon _y^0} \\ {\gamma _{xy}^0} \\ {{\kappa _x}} \\ {{\kappa _y}} \\ {{\kappa _{xy}}} \end{array}} \right]$

(5)

式中： ${A}_{ij}$ 、 ${B}_{ij}$ 、 ${D}_{ij} \left(i,j=1,2,6\right)$ 分别表示板的拉伸刚度、耦合刚度和弯曲刚度系数^[15]，表达式如下

${\begin{cases} {{A_{ij}} = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {{{\overline Q_{ij}^k }}\left( {{h_k} - {h_{k - 1}}} \right)} } \\ {{B_{ij}} = \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {{{\overline Q_{ij}^k }}( {{h^2_k} - h_{k - 1}^2} )} } \\ {{D_{ij}} = \displaystyle\frac{1}{3}\displaystyle\sum\limits_{k = 1}^n {{{\overline Q_{ij}^k }}( {{h^3_k} - h_{k - 1}^3} )} } \end{cases}}$

(6)

式中： ${\overline Q_{ij}^k }$ 为复合材料板第 $k$ 层的偏轴刚度系数

$\overline {\boldsymbol{Q}} = {{\boldsymbol{P}}^{ - 1}}{\boldsymbol{Q}}{({{\boldsymbol{P}}^{ - 1}})^{\rm{T}}}$

(7)

式中：P为坐标转换矩阵，Q为刚度矩阵。

${\boldsymbol{P}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{{\cos }^2}\theta }&{{{\sin }^2}\theta }&{2\sin \theta \cos \theta } \\ {{{\sin }^2}\theta }&{{{\cos }^2}\theta }&{ - 2\sin \theta \cos \theta } \\ { - \sin \theta \cos \theta }&{\sin \theta \cos \theta }&{{{\cos }^2}\theta - {{\sin }^2}\theta } \end{array}} \right]$

(8)

${\boldsymbol{Q}}{\rm{ = }}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{Q_{11}}}&{{Q_{12}}}&0 \\ {{Q_{12}}}&{{Q_{22}}}&0 \\ 0&0&{{Q_{66}}} \end{array}} \right]$

(9)

考虑材料为正交各向异性材料，设E₁、E₂、G₁₂、μ₁₂、μ₂₁分别为板材料x和y方向的拉压弹性模量、剪切弹性模量、主泊松比和副泊松比，则有

${Q_{11}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{{E_1}}}{{1 - {\mu _{12}}{\mu _{21}}}},\;\;\;{Q_{22}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{{E_2}}}{{1 - {\mu _{12}}{\mu _{21}}}},\;\;\;{Q_{12}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{{\mu _{12}}{E_2}}}{{1 - {\mu _{12}}{\mu _{21}}}}{\rm{ = }}\frac{{{\mu _{21}}{E_1}}}{{1 - {\mu _{12}}{\mu _{21}}}},\;\;\;{Q_{66}}{\rm{ = }}{G_{12}}$

(10)

复合材料板在左端受面内冲击荷载N作用（见图1）时，应力波沿x方向在板内传播，其应力变化如图2所示。

图 2 应力波传播示意图

Figure 2. Schematic diagram of stress wave propagation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

当应力波传播至波阵面位置L_cr（临界长度）时，板发生振动屈曲，板的内力N_t和应力波波速c分别表示为

${N_{\rm{t}}} = {\begin{cases} N&{0 \leqslant x \leqslant {L_{{\rm{cr}}}}} \\ 0&{x > {L_{{\rm{cr}}}}} \end{cases}} ,{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt}{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} c{\rm{ = }}\sqrt {\frac{{{A_{11}}}}{{\rho h}}}$

(11)

板发生振动屈曲时的变形能可以表示为

$\begin{split} U = &\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\displaystyle\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {\left( {{N_x}\varepsilon _x^0 + {N_y}\varepsilon _y^0 + {N_{xy}}\gamma _{xy}^0 + {M_x}{\kappa _x} + {M_y}{\kappa _y} + {M_{xy}}{\kappa _{xy}}} \right)} } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y {\rm{ = }}\\ &\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\displaystyle\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {\left[ {{N_x}\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial x}} + {N_y}\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial y}} + {N_{xy}}\left( {\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial x}} + \frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial y}}} \right) + {M_x}\left( { - \frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \right) + {M_y}\left( { - \frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {y^2}}}} \right) + {M_{xy}}\left( { - \frac{{2{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial x\partial y}}} \right)} \right]} } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y \end{split}$

(12)

发生振动屈曲时的动能（考虑转动惯量）可以表示为

$\begin{split} T =& \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\displaystyle\int_{ - {h}/{2}}^{{h}/{2}} {\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {{\rho _{\left( k \right)}}\left[ {{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {w_0}}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2}} \right]} } } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y{\rm{d}}z {\rm{ = }}\\ &\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {\left[ {{I_0}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {I_0}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {I_0}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {w_0}}}{{\partial t}}} \right)}^2} - 2{I_1}\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {u_0}}}{{\partial t}}\displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial x\partial t}} - 2{I_1}\displaystyle\frac{{\partial {v_0}}}{{\partial t}}\displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial y\partial t}} + {I_2}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial x\partial t}}} \right)}^2} + {I_2}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial y\partial t}}} \right)}^2}} \right]} } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y{\rm{ }} \end{split}$

(13)

式中： $\left( {{I_0},\; {I_1},\; {I_2}} \right) = \displaystyle\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{{N_k}} {\int_{{h_{k - 1}}}^{{h_k}} {{\rho _{\left( k \right)}}} } \left( {1, \;z, \;{z^2}} \right){\rm{d}}z$ ， ${{\rho _{\left( k \right)}}}$ 为第k层材料的密度。

板发生振动屈曲时的外力功可以表示为

$W = \frac{1}{2}\int_0^{{L_{\rm{cr}}}} {\int_0^{{L_{\rm{b}}}} {{N_{\rm{t}}}{{\left( {\frac{{\partial w}}{{\partial x}}} \right)}^2}} } {\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y$

(14)

考虑Hamilton变分原理，即

${\rm{\delta}} \int_{{{{t}}_1}}^{{{{t}}_2}} {\left( {T - U + W} \right)} {\rm{ d}}t = 0$

(15)

将式(12)～式(14)代入式(15)并进行变分计算，可得

$\frac{{\partial {N_x}}}{{\partial x}} + \frac{{\partial {N_{xy}}}}{{\partial x}} - {I_0}\frac{{{\partial ^2}{u_0}}}{{\partial {t^2}}} + {I_1}\frac{{{\partial ^3}{w_0}}}{{\partial x\partial {t^2}}}{\rm{ = }}0$

(16)

$\frac{{\partial {N_y}}}{{\partial y}} + \frac{{\partial {N_{xy}}}}{{\partial y}} - {I_0}\frac{{{\partial ^2}{v_0}}}{{\partial {t^2}}} + {I_1}\frac{{{\partial ^3}{w_0}}}{{\partial y\partial {t^2}}}{\rm{ = }}0$

(17)

$\frac{{{\partial ^2}{M_x}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^2}{M_y}}}{{\partial {y^2}}} - 2\frac{{{\partial ^2}{M_{xy}}}}{{\partial x\partial y}} - {N_{\rm t}}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_1}}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \right) = {I_0}\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {t^2}}}{\kern 1pt} + {I_1}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^3}{u_0}}}{{\partial x\partial {t^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^3}{v_0}}}{{\partial x\partial {t^2}}}} \right) - {I_2}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}\partial {t^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {y^2}\partial {t^2}}}} \right)$

(18)

对于正交各向异性正规对称正交铺设的复合材料板，其刚度矩阵满足^[16]

${D}_{16}={D}_{26}=0,\;\;{A}_{16}={A}_{26}=0,\;\;{B}_{ij}=0$

(19)

根据 Kirchhoff 薄板理论及经典弹性理论，薄板中面在变形过程中没有伸长变形，将板的本构关系代入式(16)～式(18)中，略去含 ${u_0}$ 和 ${v_0}$ 的项，得到复合材料板在面向阶跃荷载激励下的控制方程

${D_{11}}\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^4}}} + \left( {2{D_{12}} + 4{D_{66}}} \right)\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}\partial {y^2}}} + {D_{22}}\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {y^4}}} + {N_{\rm t}}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_1}}}{{\partial {x^2}}}} \right) - {I_0}\frac{{{\partial ^2}{w_0}}}{{\partial {t^2}}} + {I_2}\left( {\frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {x^2}\partial {t^2}}} + \frac{{{\partial ^4}{w_0}}}{{\partial {y^2}\partial {t^2}}}} \right) = 0$

(20)

设三边简支和应力波传播到L_cr（ ${w_0}\left( {{L_{{\rm{cr}}}},y,t} \right) = {w'_0}\left( {{L_{{\rm{cr}}}},y,t} \right) = 0$ ）时的振型函数^[17]为

${w_0}\left( {x,y,t} \right) = {R_{ij}}\left[ {\sin \frac{{i{\text{π}} x}}{{{L_{{\rm{cr}}}}}} + \frac{i}{{i + 1}}\sin \frac{{\left( {i + 1} \right){\text{π}}x }}{{{L_{{\rm{cr}}}}}}} \right]\sin \frac{{j{\text{π}} {{y}}}}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}\sin \left( {\omega {\kern 1pt} t + \varphi } \right){\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt}$

(21)

由屈曲模态确定的缺陷分布形式是板结构最有可能发生的屈曲形式，能够很好地确定结构的缺陷敏感性^[18]。对于复合材料板在制造过程中出现的初始几何缺陷，引入屈曲模态的 $\varepsilon$ 倍变形作为初始几何缺陷^[19]，可以表示为

${w_1}\left( {x,y} \right) = \varepsilon {R_{ij}}\left[ {\sin \frac{{i{\text{π}}x }}{{{L_{{\rm{cr}}}}}} + \frac{i}{{i + 1}}\sin \frac{{\left( {i + 1} \right){\text{π}} x}}{{{L_{{\rm{cr}}}}}}} \right]\sin \frac{{j{\text{π}} {{y}}}}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt}$

(22)

式中：i、j为屈曲模态阶数， $i,j = 1,2,3, \cdots$ ；R_ij为板的第(i, j)阶模态幅值； $\varepsilon$ 表示初始几何缺陷系数。

根据式(21)和式(22)，利用棣莫弗公式对控制方程式(20)中的各项进行求导并化简，得到

$\begin{split} &{D_{11}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)^4}\left[ {{i^4} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^4}} \right]\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \left( {2{D_{12}} + 4{D_{66}}} \right){\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^2}\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \\ &2{D_{22}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^4}\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) - {N_{\rm{t}}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]\left[ {\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \varepsilon } \right] + 2{I_0}{\omega ^2}\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \\ &{I_2}{\omega ^2}\left\{ {{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right] + 2{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)}^2}} \right\}\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) = 0 \end{split}$

(23)

根据式(23)可以得到N的表达式

$\begin{split} N{\rm{ = }}&\left\{ {{D_{11}}{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^4}\left[ {{i^4} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^4}} \right] + \left( {2{D_{12}} + 4{D_{66}}} \right){{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)}^2}} \right. + 2{D_{22}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^4} + 2{I_0}{\omega ^2} + \\ &{\left.{I_2}{\omega ^2}\left\{ {{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right] + 2{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)}^2}} \right\}\right\}} \displaystyle\frac{{\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right)}}{{{{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)}^2}\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]\left[ {\sin \left( {\omega t + \varphi } \right) + \varepsilon } \right]}} \end{split}$

(24)

板发生屈曲时，临界条件为 $\omega = 0$ ^[20]，代入式(24)可得振动屈曲临界荷载为

${N_{\rm{cr}}}{\rm{ = }}{D_{11}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{\text{π}} }{{{L_{\rm{cr}}}}}} \right)^2}\displaystyle\frac{{\left[ {{i^4} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^4}} \right]\sin \varphi }}{{\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]\left( {\sin \varphi + \varepsilon } \right)}} + \left( {2{D_{12}} + 4{D_{66}}} \right){\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{j{\text{π}} }}{{{L_{\rm{b}}}}}} \right)^2}\displaystyle\frac{{\sin \varphi}}{{\left( {\sin \varphi + \varepsilon } \right)}} + 2{D_{22}}{\left( {\displaystyle\frac{{{j^2}{\text{π}} }}{{L_{\rm{b}}^2}}} \right)^2}L_{{\rm{cr}}}^2\displaystyle\frac{{\sin \varphi}}{{\left[ {{i^2} + {{\left( {i + 1} \right)}^2}} \right]\left( {\sin \varphi + \varepsilon } \right)}}$

(25)

2. 算例分析

利用MATLAB数值分析应力波未反射时初始几何缺陷、初相位、铺层角度、屈曲模态阶数、铺设厚度以及铺层层数对复合材料板振动屈曲临界荷载的影响，使用的材料参数见表1^[21]。

表 1 复合材料板参数^[21]

Table 1. Material parameters of composite plate^[21]

E₁/GPa	E₂/GPa	G₁₂/GPa	μ₁₂	L_a/m	L_b/m
140.0	8.6	5.0	0.35	0.60	0.50

下载: 导出CSV

| 显示表格

图3显示了复合材料板的模态阶数i为1、2、3，j为1时的屈曲模态。当板的x方向模态增大时，x方向的屈曲模态第一峰值增大且波数增加，而y方向的屈曲模态呈正对称分布。模态阶数的增加使板振动的屈曲模态变得更复杂。

图 3 x方向模态取值增大时板的屈曲模态

Figure 3. Buckling mode of composite plate with increasing mode value in x direction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

设置7组算例，分别以初始几何缺陷、初相位、铺层角度、x和y两个方向屈曲模态阶数、铺层层数及铺设厚度为变量进行算例分析，研究以上因素对板振动屈曲临界荷载的影响，算例参数见表2。

表 2 算例分析参数表

Table 2. Example analysis parameter table

Group	Initial defect coefficient	Order of mode		Laying angle/(°)	Initial phase	Number of layers laid	Thickness of the plate/m
Group	Initial defect coefficient	x direction	y direction	Laying angle/(°)	Initial phase	Number of layers laid	Thickness of the plate/m
A	Variable	i = 1	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	0.01
B	0.1	Variable	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	0.01
C	0.1	i =1	Variable	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	0.01
D	0.1	i =1	j = 1	Variable	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	0.01
E	0.1	i =1	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	Variable	5	0.01
F	0.1	i =1	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	Variable	0.01
G	0.1	i =1	j = 1	[0, 0, 0, 0, 0]	${\text{π}}$ /2	5	Variable

下载: 导出CSV

| 显示表格

将A组数据代入式(25)中，可以得到不同初始缺陷系数对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图4所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：在应力波传播过程中，N_cr呈指数下降，分为敏感区和非敏感区。应力波在L_cr < 0.4 m区域传播时，N_cr的变化较陡峭，该区域为敏感区；应力波在L_cr > 0.4 m区域传播时，N_cr的变化趋于平缓，该区域为非敏感区，因此敏感分界点为0.4 m。当选取的初始缺陷系数增大时，临界荷载N_cr也随之增大。在敏感区，初始缺陷系数对临界荷载N_cr的影响较大，且随应力波传播呈减小趋势。此外，初始缺陷系数对非敏感区的影响较小。图4表明，初始几何缺陷系数越大，板越容易发生屈曲。

图 4 不同初始缺陷系数条件下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 4. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under different initial defect coefficients

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将B组数据代入式(25)中，可以得到不同x方向模态阶数对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图5所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：当选取的x方向模态阶数增大时，临界荷载N_cr随之明显增大。在敏感区，x方向模态阶数对临界荷载N_cr的影响很大，并随应力波的传播不断减小，到达非敏感区之后影响较小并趋于稳定。图5表明，x方向模态阶数的增加会显著增大板的屈曲临界荷载。

图 5 x方向模态阶数不同时N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 5. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr with different order of modes in x direction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将C组数据代入式(25)中，可以得到不同的y方向模态阶数对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图6所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：当选取的y方向模态阶数增大时，临界荷载N_cr也随之变大。在应力波传播过程中，在敏感区y方向模态阶数对临界载荷基本没有影响，而在非敏感区有极小的影响。图6表明，y方向模态阶数的变化对板屈曲临界荷载基本没有影响。

图 6 y方向模态阶数不同时N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 6. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr with different order of modes in y direction

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将D组数据代入式(25)中，得到不同铺层角度对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图7所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：在敏感区，不同的铺设角度对临界荷载N_cr的影响较大，且随应力波的传播不断减小，到达非敏感区后趋于稳定。图7表明，铺层角度小的单层板的层数越多，板的临界屈曲荷载越大，说明复合材料板的铺设角度直接影响板的屈曲临界荷载。

图 7 不同铺层角度条件下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 7. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under different laying angles

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将E组数据代入式(25)中，得到不同初相位对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图8所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：振型函数的初相位越大，对应的临界荷载越大。在敏感区，振型函数的初相位对临界荷载N_cr的影响较小，且随应力波的传播不断减小；到达非敏感区之后，影响趋于平缓。图8表明，振型函数的初相位越大，板的屈曲临界荷载越大。

图 8 不同初相位条件下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 8. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under the condition of initial phase of different mode functions

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将F组数据代入式(25)中，得到不同铺层层数对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图9所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：当按照不同层数铺设时，敏感区的临界荷载N_cr的变化较大，且随应力波的传播不断减小；到达非敏感区之后变化较小并趋于平缓。图9表明，对于厚度固定且对称铺设的板，当铺设层数达到7时，其屈曲荷载随层数增加趋于稳定。

图 9 不同铺层层数下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 9. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under different laying modes

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

将G组数据代入式(25)中，得到不同铺设厚度对复合材料板振动屈曲的影响，如图10所示。由L_cr-N_cr曲线可知：板的铺设厚度越大，对应的临界荷载越大。在敏感区，不同的板厚对临界荷载N_cr的影响很大，且随应力波的传播不断减小，到达非敏感区后趋于稳定。图10表明，复合材料板的铺设厚度将直接决定板的屈曲临界荷载。

图 10 不同铺设厚度下N_cr与L_cr的关系曲线

Figure 10. Relationship between N_cr and L_cr under different thicknesses

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

3. 结　论

基于Kirchhoff薄板理论和Hamilton变分原理，建立了具有初始几何缺陷的四边简支复合材料板的振动控制方程。采用伽辽金法，选取符合边界条件的振型函数求解控制方程，得到屈曲临界载荷表达式。数值计算结果表明：应力波在未发生反射前的传播过程中，复合材料板的振动屈曲临界载荷随着临界长度的增大、铺设厚度的减小、初始几何缺陷系数的增大、振型函数初相位的减小而减小；复合材料板的各层铺层角度与荷载作用方向的夹角越小，屈曲临界载荷越大，当对称铺设层数达7层时，临界荷载趋于稳定。研究结果可为工程中复合材料板的结构设计与应用提供一定的参考。

Figure 1. Comparison between the present model predictions (Eq.(9) and Eq.(10)) and the experimental data for ceramic materials

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 2. Comparisons between the present model predictions (Eq.(4) and Eq.(9)) with the experimental data

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 3. Comparison between the present model predictions (Eq.(6)) with available experimental data for different ceramic materials at different strain rates (Unit of strain rate: s^–1)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 4. Comparisons between the present model predictions (Eq.(4)) and the experimental data obtained from plate impact tests

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 5. Comparison between the experimental data^[25] and the predictions by the present model of strength varies with pressure at different strain rates of AlN

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 6. Comparison of stress-strain curves for BeO under triaxial compression between the present model and experimental data^[22]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 7. Variation of pressure, effective stress with maximum principal strain for AlN under quasi-static uniaxial tension

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 8. Variation of pressure and effective stress with maximum principal strain for AlN under quasi-static biaxial tension

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 9. Numerically predicted relationship between pressure and maximum principal strain of AlN under both quasi-static triaxial tension

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 10. Schematic diagrams of the geometric dimensions of the projectile-target combination under the impact velocity of 1 500 m/s (Same materials used for all target configurations, and all configuration are axisymmetric.)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Figure 11. Comparison between the numerical results and the test data for the depth of penetration in AD99.7/RHA targets by flat-nosed tungsten alloy penetrators^[35]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

Table 1. Values of parameters for BeO in the present model

Equation of state parameters				Constitutive model parameters
K₁/GPa	K₂/GPa	K₃/GPa	ρ_c/(kg·m⁻³)	F_m	W_x	W_y	S
181.5	1 207.9	−2 991	3 030	3	3.8	2	1.25

Constitutive model parameters
${f_{{\rm{c}}}'}$ /GPa	f_t/GPa	B	G/GPa	λ_m	λ_s	l	r
1.5	0.15	1.2	125	0.3	7.5	0.8	0.3

下载: 导出CSV

Table 2. Values of parameters for AlN in the present model

Equation of state parameters							Constitutive model parameters
ρ_c/(kg·m⁻³)	K₁/GPa	K₂/GPa	K₃/GPa	K₄/GPa	K₅/GPa	K₆/GPa	F_m	W_x	W_y
3 229	181.5	1 207.9	−2 991	181.9	335.6	−283	3	3.8	2

Constitutive model parameters
${f_{{\rm{c}}}'}$ /GPa	f_t/GPa	B	G/GPa	S	λ_m	λ_s	l	r
3	0.3	1.7	127	1.25	0.3	7.5	0.8	0.3

下载: 导出CSV

Table 3. Values of various parameters for AlN ceramic (JH-2 model)

Equation of state parameters				Constitutive model parameters
ρ_c/(kg·m⁻³)	K₁/GPa	K₂/GPa	K₃/GPa	a	b	C	n	m
3 229	201	260	0	1.36	1.0	0.013	0.75	0.65

Constitutive model parameters
HEL/GPa	p_HEL/GPa	σ_HEL/GPa	μ_HEL	T/GPa	β	d₁	d₂
9.0	5.0	6.0	0.024 2	0.32	1.0	0.02	1.85

下载: 导出CSV

Table 4. Values of various parameters for AD99.7 ceramic^[35] (The present model)

Equation of state parameters				Constitutive model parameters
ρ_c/(kg·m⁻³)	K₁/GPa	K₁/GPa	K₃/GPa	F_m	W_x	W_y	S
3 809	181.5	1 207.9	−2 991	3	3.8	2	1.25

Constitutive model parameters
${f_{{\rm{c}}}'}$ /GPa	f_t/GPa	B	G/GPa	λ_m	λ_s	l	r
3	0.3	1.4	135	0.3	7.5	0.8	0.3

下载: 导出CSV

Table 5. Values of various parameters for tungsten alloy^[35] (JC model)

Constitutive model parameters
ρ_c/(kg·m⁻³)	G/GPa	A₁/GPa	B₁/GPa	N₁	C₁	M₁	${\dot \varepsilon_{_0}}$ /s⁻¹
17 600	122	1.506	0.177	0.12	0.016	1.0	1.0

Constitutive model parameters
c_p/(J·kg⁻¹·K⁻¹)	T_m/K	T_r/K	D₁	D₂	D₃	D₄	D₅
134	1 723	300	2.0	0	0	0	0

Equation of state parameters
C_s/(m·s⁻¹)	S₁	S₂	S₃	γ₀	A₀
4 029	1.23	0	0	1.54	0.4

下载: 导出CSV

Table 6. Values of various parameters for RHA^[35] (JC model)

Constitutive model parameters
ρ_c/(kg·m⁻³)	G/GPa	A₁/GPa	B₁/GPa	N₁	C₁	M₁	${\dot \varepsilon _{_{0}}}$ /s⁻¹
7 800	77	0.792	0.51	0.26	0.014	1.03	1.0

Constitutive model parameters
c_p/(J·kg⁻¹·K⁻¹)	T_m/K	T_r/K	D₁	D₂	D₃	D₄	D₅
477	1 793	294	0.05	3.44	−2.12	0.002	0.61

Equation of state parameters
C_s/(m·s⁻¹)	S₁	S₂	S₃	γ₀	A₀
4 569	1.49	0	0	2.17	0.460

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(35)

[1]	FAHRENTHOLD E P. A continuum damage model for fracture of brittle solids under dynamic loading [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1991, 58(4): 904–909. doi: 10.1115/1.2897704
[2]	RAJENDRAN A M. Modeling the impact behavior of AD85 ceramic under multiaxial loading [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1994, 15(6): 749–768. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(94)90033-H
[3]	JOHNSON G R, HOLMQUIST T J. An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials [J]. High Pressure Science and Technology, 2008, 309(1): 981–984.
[4]	SIMHA C H, BLESS S, BEDFORD A, et al. Computational modeling of the penetration response of a high-purity ceramic [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2002, 27(1): 65–86. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00036-7
[5]	RAVICHANDRAN G, SUBHASH G. A micromechanical model for high strain rate behavior of ceramics [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1995: 2627–2646.
[6]	ESPINOSA H D. On the dynamic shear resistance of ceramic composites and its dependence on applied multiaxial deformation [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1995, 32(21): 3105–3128. doi: 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00300-L
[7]	ESPINOSA H D, XU Y, BRAR N S. Micromechanics of failure waves in glass: Ⅱ, modeling [J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1997, 80(8): 2074–2085.
[8]	STEINBERG D J. Computer studies of the dynamic strength of ceramics [M]//Shock Waves. Berlin: Springer, 1992: 415–422.
[9]	XU H, WEN H M. A computational constitutive model for concrete subjected to dynamic loadings [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 91: 116–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.01.003
[10]	XU H, WEN H M. Semi-empirical equations for the dynamic strength enhancement of concrete-like materials [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 60: 76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.005
[11]	ZHAO F Q, WEN H M. A comment on the maximum dynamic tensile strength of a concrete-like material [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 115: 32–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.01.009
[12]	ZHAO F Q, WEN H M. Effect of free water content on the penetration of concrete [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 121: 180–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.06.007
[13]	BRIDGMAN P W. Linear compressions to 30 000 kg/cm², including relatively incompressible substances [J]. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1949, 77(6): 189–234. doi: 10.2307/20023541
[14]	HART H V, DRICKAMER H G. Effect of high pressure on the lattice parameters of Al₂O₃ [J]. Journal of Chemical Physics, 1965, 43(7): 2265–2266. doi: 10.1063/1.1697121
[15]	SATO Y, AKIMOTO S. Hydrostatic compression of four corundum-type compounds: α-Al₂O₃, V₂O₃, Cr₂O₃, and α-Fe₂O [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1979, 50(8): 5285–5291. doi: 10.1063/1.326625
[16]	BASSETT W A, WEATHERS M S, WU T C, et al. Compressibility of SiC up to 68.4 GPa [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1993, 74(6): 3824–3826. doi: 10.1063/1.354476
[17]	ROSENBERG Z, BRAR N S, BLESS S J. Dynamic high-pressure properties of AlN ceramic as determined by flyer plate impact [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1991, 70(1): 167–171. doi: 10.1063/1.350337
[18]	XIA Q, XIA H, RUOFF A L. Pressure induced rocksalt phase of aluminum nitride: a metastable structure at ambient condition [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1993, 73(12): 8198–8200. doi: 10.1063/1.353435
[19]	UENO M, ONODERA A, SHIMOMURA O, et al. X-ray observation of the structural phase transition of aluminum nitride under high pressure [J]. Physical Review B, 1992, 45(17): 10123. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.10123
[20]	ROSENBERG Z, YAZIV D, YESHURUN Y, et al. Shear strength of shock-loaded alumina as determined with longitudinal and transverse manganin gauges [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1987, 62(3): 1120–1122. doi: 10.1063/1.339721
[21]	BOURNE N K, MILLETT J, PICKUP I, et al. Delayed failure in shocked silicon carbide [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1997, 81(9): 6019–6023. doi: 10.1063/1.364450
[22]	FENG R, RAISER G F, GUPTA Y M, et al. Material strength and inelastic deformation of silicon carbide under shock wave compression [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1998, 83(1): 79–86. doi: 10.1063/1.366704
[23]	PICKUP I M, BARKER A K. Deviatoric strength of silicon carbide subject to shock [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2000, 505(1): 573–576.
[24]	LEE M, BRANNON R M, BRONOWSKI D R. Uniaxial and triaxial compression tests of silicon carbide ceramics under quasi-static loading condition [R]. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories, 2005.
[25]	CHEN W, RAVICHANDRAN G. Static and dynamic compressive behavior of aluminum nitride under moderate confinement [J]. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 1996, 79(3): 579–584.
[26]	HEARD H C, CLINE C F. Mechanical behaviour of polycrystalline BeO, Al₂O₃ and AlN at high pressure [J]. Journal of Materials Science, 1980, 15(8): 1889–1897. doi: 10.1007/BF00550614
[27]	WILKINS M L, CLINE C F, HONODEL C A. Fourth progress report of light armor program [R]. Livermore: Lawrence Radiation Laboratories, 1969.
[28]	HOLMQUIST T J, TEMPLETON D W, BISHNOI K D. Constitutive modeling of aluminum nitride for large strain, high-strain rate, and high-pressure applications [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001, 25(3): 211–231. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00046-4
[29]	ZINSZNER J L, ERZAR B, FORQUIN P, et al. Dynamic fragmentation of an alumina ceramic subjected to shockless spalling: an experimental and numerical study [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solid, 2015, 85: 112–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2015.08.014
[30]	GALVEZ F, RODRIGUEZ J, SANCHEZ V. Tensile strength measurements of ceramic materials at high rates of strain [J]. Le Journal de Physique IV, 1997, 7(C3): 151.
[31]	GALVEZ F, RODRIGUEZ J, SANCHEZ V. The spalling of long bars as a reliable method of measuring the dynamic tensile strength of ceramics [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2002, 27(2): 161–177. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00039-2
[32]	BOURNE N K. Shock-induced brittle failure of boron carbide [J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2002, 458: 1999–2006. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2002.0968
[33]	VOGLER T J, REINHART W D, CHHABILDAS L C. Dynamic behavior of boron carbide [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2004, 95: 4173–4183. doi: 10.1063/1.1686902
[34]	HAYUN S, PARIS V, DARIEL M P, et al. Static and dynamic mechanical properties of boron carbide processed by spark plasma sintering [J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2009, 29(16): 3395–3400. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.07.007
[35]	LUNDBERG P, WESTERLING L, LUNDBERG B. Influence of scale on the penetration of tungsten rods into steel-backed alumina targets [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1996, 18(4): 403–416. doi: 10.1016/0734-743X(95)00049-G