前舱物对低速大质量平头弹侵彻金属薄板的影响

刘雨佳; 侯海量; 李茂; 金键; 戴文喜

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20190830

前舱物对低速大质量平头弹侵彻金属薄板的影响

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190830

刘雨佳^1,,
侯海量^1,*, ,,
李茂²,
金键¹,
戴文喜³

1.
海军工程大学船舶与海洋学院，湖北武汉　430033
2.
海军研究院，北京　100161
3.
中国舰船研究与设计中心，湖北武汉　430064

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（51679246）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘雨佳（1995－），男，硕士研究生，主要从事舰船防护结构研究. E-mail: liuyj1995@qq.com

通讯作者:
侯海量（1977－），男，博士，副教授，硕士生导师，主要从事舰船抗爆抗冲击研究. E-mail: hou9611104@163.com

中图分类号: O385
计量
- 文章访问数: 9020
- HTML全文浏览量: 3500
- PDF下载量: 24
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-08-29
- 修回日期: 2019-10-04
- 发布日期: 2019-12-25

Influence of Nose Cabin on Low Speed Blunt Projectile during Penetration of Metal Plate

LIU Yujia^1
,,
HOU Hailiang^{1,*
, ,},
LI Mao²,
JIN Jian¹,
DAI Wenxi³

1.
College of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, Hubei, China
2.
Naval Research Academy, Beijing 100161, China
3.
China Ship Design and Research Center, Wuhan 430064, Hubei, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究前舱物对低速大质量平头弹侵彻金属薄靶的影响，根据前舱物的力学特性，将前舱物等效为轻质泡沫铝材料，建立了含前舱物的平头弹结构有限元分析模型，开展了不同工况下带前舱物平头弹侵彻金属薄板的数值模拟计算，分析了带前舱物平头弹侵彻金属薄板的过程，对比了带前舱物平头弹和不计前舱物平头弹在不同工况下剩余速度的差异。数值计算结果表明：带前舱物平头弹与不计前舱物平头弹的侵彻过程存在明显差异，但靶板破坏模式相同；前舱物等效材料的屈服强度对平头弹侵彻性能的影响很小，可以忽略不计；前舱物有助于提高平头弹侵彻金属薄板的能力，但提升幅度有限。在实际工程应用中，可以忽略前舱物对平头弹侵彻金属薄板的影响。
- 前舱物 /
- 平头弹 /
- 金属薄靶 /
- 变截面刚度弹体模型
Abstract: In order to study the effect of nose cabin on projectile low speed and high mass during the penetration of metal plates, a finite element analysis model of blunt projectile with nose cabin was established. Based on the mechanical properties, nose cabin can be regarded as equivalent to light foam aluminum material. Numerical simulation of blunt projectile with nose cabin penetrates into metal plates under different working conditions were implemented. The progress of projectile with nose cabin penetrates into metal plate was analyzed. The difference between residual velocity of blunt projectile with and without nose cabin was compared. The results show that there are significant differences in the progress of projectiles penetration into metal plates between blunt projectiles with and without nose cabin. Nevertheless, the failure modes for both conditions are similar. The yield stress of equivalent material of nose cabin has limited influence on penetrative performance of projectile. In conclusion, nose cabin can bring very limited improvement to the penetration capability of blunt projectile, and the effect of nose cabin can be neglected in practical engineering applications.
- nose cabin /
- blunt projectile /
- metal plates /
- model of variable section stiffness projectile

HTML全文

图 1 泡沫铝材料载荷-位移曲线

Figure 1. Loading-displacement curve for aluminum foam material

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 带前舱物战斗部等效计算模型

Figure 2. Equivalent calculation model of projectile with nose cabin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 侵彻过程

Figure 3. Progress of perforation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 靶板应力分布

Figure 4. Stress distribution of target

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 速度时程曲线

Figure 5. Velocity-time curve

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 靶板应变云图

Figure 6. Strain distribution of the target

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 不同靶板厚度时的剩余速度对比

Figure 7. Comparison of residual velocity with different target thickness

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 不同侵彻速度下的剩余速度对比

Figure 8. Comparison of residual velocity with different initial velocity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 弹体和靶板的J-C模型参表

Table 1. J-C model parameters of projectile body and target

Material	ρ/（g·cm^–3）	E/GPa	μ	c_p/（J·kg^–1·K^–1）	T₀/K	T_m/K
Warhead shell	7.80	205	0.28	400.90	300	1 765
Target plate	7.80	200	0.30	452.00	298	1 881

Material	$\dot \varepsilon $/s^–1	A/MPa	B/MPa	n	C	m
Warhead shell	1	760	500	0.53	0.014	1.13
Target plate	1	355	450	0.36	0.022	1.00

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 弹塑性硬化模型材料参数

Table 2. Material parameters of the Elastoplastic hardening model

Material	ρ/（kg·m^–3）	E/GPa	μ	σ_y/MPa	E_t/MPa	β	c/s^–1	p	f_s
Charge	1 750	5	0.3	20	300	0	0	0	5
Nose cabin	700	0.5	0.3	0.5–10.0	0	0	0	0	0.4

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 不同等效屈服强度下侵彻结果的比较

Table 3. Comparison of penetration results with different yield stress

Equivalent yield strength/MPa	Distortion range/mm	Residual velocity/（m·s^–1）
0.5	2 629.70	325.88
1.0	2 624.41	326.30
2.0	2 629.31	326.37
5.0	2 625.23	326.75
10.0	2 659.20	326.86

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(14)

[1]	卢芳云, 蒋邦海, 李翔宇, 等. 武器战斗部投射与毁伤 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 209. LU F Y, JIANG B H, LI X Y, et al. Weapon warhead transmission and damage [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013: 209.
[2]	陈斌, 于起峰, 杨跃能, 等. 30 mm半穿甲弹斜侵彻陶瓷/钢复合装甲的弹着角效应研究 [J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2009, 31(6): 139–143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2486.2009.06.026 CHEN B, YU Q F, YANG Y N, et a1. Effect of impact angle of 30 mm semi-AP projectile obliquely penetrating ceramic steel targets [J]. Journal of National Unversity of Defense Technology, 2009, 31(6): 139–143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2486.2009.06.026
[3]	朱锡, 侯海量. 防半穿甲导弹战斗部动能穿甲模拟试验研究 [J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2002, 14(2): 13–19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3486.2002.02.004 ZHU X, HOU H L. The simulative research on the kinetic armor-piercing effect of semi-armor-piercing missile warhead [J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2002, 14(2): 13–19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3486.2002.02.004
[4]	楼建锋, 杭义洪. 弹头前舱对战斗部穿甲能力的影响 [C]// 第三届全国计算爆炸力学会议. 青岛: 中国力学学会爆炸力学专业委员会, 2006: 205–211.
[5]	陈刚. 半穿甲战斗部弹体穿甲效应数值模拟与实验研究 [D]. 绵阳: 中国工程物理研究院, 2006: 107–124. CHEN G. Numerical and experimental envestigation on penetration effects of semi-armor-piercing warhead [D]. Mianyang: China Academy of Engineering Physics, 2006: 107–124.
[6]	CHEN X W, YANG Y B, LU Z H, et al. Perforation of metallic plates struck by a blunt projectile with a soft nose [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(6): 549–558. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.05.002
[7]	徐钰巍, 黄风雷, 皮爱国, 等. 带前舱弹体斜撞击硬目标的姿态偏转 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2016, 36(10): 1011–1014. XU Y W, HUANG F L, PI A G, et al. Attitude deflection of projectile with nose cabin under oblique impact on the hard target [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016, 36(10): 1011–1014.
[8]	ZHANG B Y, LIN Y F, LI S, et al. Quasi-static and high strain rates compressive behavior of aluminum matrix syntactic foams [J]. Composites Part B, 2016(98): 288–296.
[9]	高华, 熊超, 殷军辉. 多次冲击下泡沫铝动态压缩力学性能试验与本构模型研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(12): 124–133. GAO H, XIONG C, YIN J H. Experimental and constitutive model on dynamic compressive mechanical properties of aluminum foams under repeated impacts [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(12): 124–133.
[10]	王耀琦. 多层泡沫铝填充胀环复合机构缓冲特性研究 [D]. 太原: 中北大学, 2018: 44–47. WANG Y Q. Study on buffering characteristics of multi-layer foamed aluminum filled the expanded-rude compound structure [D]. Taiyuan: North University of China, 2018: 44–47.
[11]	李继承, 陈小伟, 陈刚.921A钢纯剪切帽状试件绝热剪切行为的数值模拟研究 [C]//第九届全国冲击动力学学术会议论文集(上册), 2009: 229–236.
[12]	屈明, 陈小伟, 陈刚. 细长薄壁弹体撞击钢靶屈曲的数值分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2008, 28(2): 116–223. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2008.02.004 QU M, CHEN X W, CHEN G. Numerical study of dynamic plastic buckling of deep penetration projectile [J]. Explosive and Shock Waves, 2008, 28(2): 116–223. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2008.02.004
[13]	徐伟, 侯海量, 朱锡, 等. 平头弹低速冲击下薄钢板的穿甲破坏机理研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(5): 883–892. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.05.007 XU W, HOU H L, ZHU X, et al. Investigation on the damage mechanism of blunt projectile against thin plate [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(5): 883–892. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.05.007
[14]	徐松林, 高汝明, 姚江涛. 国外海基反舰导弹战斗部研究进展 [J]. 战术导弹技术, 2012(5): 117–122. XU S L, GAO R M, YAO J T. The development of foreign sea-based anti-ship missile’s warhead [J]. Tactical Missile Technology, 2012(5): 117–122.