高压下单晶橄榄石的电导率

田浩然; 徐良旭; 李娜娜; 张茜; 林俊孚; 刘锦

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20190775

高压下单晶橄榄石的电导率

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190775

田浩然^1,,
徐良旭¹,
李娜娜¹,
张茜¹,
林俊孚²,
刘锦^1,*, ,

1.
北京高压科学研究中心，北京　100193
2.
德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校，美国德克萨斯 78701

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（U1530402）

详细信息

作者简介:
田浩然（1993－），男，硕士研究生，主要从事矿物物理学研究. E-mail：haoran.tian@hpstar.ac.cn

通讯作者:
刘　锦（1984－），男，博士，研究员，主要从事地球深部结构与物质组成研究. E-mail：jin.liu@hpstar.ac.cn

中图分类号: O732; P574.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 242
- HTML全文浏览量: 95
- PDF下载量: 6
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-05-13
- 修回日期: 2019-06-18
- 刊出日期: 2019-12-01

High-Pressure Electrical Conductivity of Single-Crystal Olivine

TIAN Haoran^1
,,
XU Liangxu¹,
LI Nana¹,
ZHANG Qian¹,
LIN Junfu²,
LIU Jin^{1,*
, ,}

1.
Center for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research, Beijing 100193, China
2.
The University of Texas at Austin, Texas 78701, USA

摘要

摘要: 以圣卡洛斯（San Carlos）单晶橄榄石为研究对象，结合交流阻抗谱和金刚石对顶砧（DAC）技术，在300 K、0～19 GPa条件下对其电导率的各向异性进行系统研究。压力标定根据红宝石荧光谱线的漂移以及硅油的拉曼光谱。实验结果表明：在300 K、0～19 GPa条件下，橄榄石[100]方向上的电导率最大，从3.8×10^–8 S/m增加到9.0×10^–8 S/m，[010]与[001]方向上的电导率接近，约为[100]方向电导率的1/2～1/3；橄榄石电导率随着压力线性增加，其中[100]方向的电导率随着压力变化的斜率最大。在室温条件下，橄榄石主要的导电机制是小极化子导电，且具有负的活化体积。研究结果表明，在含水量较低的上地幔区域，随着深度增加，压力效应可能导致电导率横向和纵向的不均一性增强。
- 橄榄石 /
- 复阻抗谱 /
- 金刚石压腔 /
- 电导率 /
- 各向异性
Abstract: The electrical conductivity of single-crystal San Carlos olivine was measured up to 19 GPa at room temperature in a diamond-anvil cell, coupled with a complex impedance spectroscopy. The pressure was determined by in-situ ruby luminescence and Raman shift of silicone fluid. We found that the electrical conductivity along [100] is largest, increasing approximately from 3.8×10^–8 S/m at 0 GPa to 9.0×10^–8 S/m at 18 GPa at room temperature. The conductivity along [010] is comparable to that of [001], approximately as 1/2 to 1/3 as that of [100]. Furthermore, the conductivity linearly increases with the pressure, while it changes faster with the pressure along [100] than that of [010] and [001]. At room temperature, the charge transport mechanism of olivine is dominant from the Fe²⁺–Fe³⁺ (small polarons) with a negative activation volume. The present results suggest that the pressure effect could lead to larger lateral and vertical heterogeneity in electrical conduction for a dry upper mantle.
- olivine /
- complex impedance spectroscopy /
- diamond anvil cell /
- electrical conductivity /
- anisotropy

HTML全文

图 1 （a）DAC中样品、电极俯视图；（b）[100]方向橄榄石样品显微图像；（c）DAC横截面图；（d）四电极法样品显微图像

Figure 1. (a) Top view of the sample and electrodes in a DAC; (b) Microscopic image of the olivine sample along [100] direction;(c) Cross section view of DAC; (d) Microscopic image of the sample and electrodes using the four-probe method

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 PMX-200硅油v_{2 906}拉曼频移与压力关系

Figure 2. The relation between pressure and Raman shift of v_{2 906}

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 橄榄石的代表性阻抗谱及其等效电路

Figure 3. Representative impedance spectra and equivalent circuit

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 300 K下橄榄石单晶的电导率随压力的变化

Figure 4. The conductivity of the single-crystal olivine as a function of pressure at 300 K

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 橄榄石的平均电导率随压力的变化

Figure 5. Electrical conductivity of olivine aggregates as a function of pressure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 橄榄石小极化子导电机制的活化体积随铁含量的变化

Figure 6. Total iron content versus activation volume for the small polaron conduction mechanism in olivine

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 干的橄榄石不同轴向电导率随深度变化曲线

Figure 7. Conductivity profile of dry olivine in different orientations

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 样品的EPMA分析结果（质量分数）

Table 1. EPMA analysis results of sample (Mass fraction) %

FeO	MgO	CaO	MnO	SiO₂	Cr₂O₃	NiO	Total
8.78	50.10	0.07	0.11	40.49	0.03	0.35	99.94

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 样品电阻拟合数据

Table 2. Sample resistance fitting data

[100] direction		[010] direction		[001] direction
p/GPa	R/GΩ	p/GPa	R/GΩ	p/GPa	R/GΩ
0	80.8	0	91.7	0	88.1
2.2	67.2	1.8	79.0	1.6	84.1
3.7	61.8	5.3	71.6	3.7	76.9
6.2	57.0	6.6	61.7	6.3	69.7
8.1	52.0	8.0	58.1	8.5	62.1
10.1	46.2	10.1	57.0	10.6	54.3
12.5	41.1	12.7	51.6	12.5	53.2
14.8	34.7	14.7	50.1	13.7	52.1
18.0	28.0	15.8	44.0	14.9	50.3
		19.1	36.0	16.8	49.0
				17.8	47.1

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(39)

[1]	LARSEN J C. Low frequency (0.1-6.0 CPD) electromagnetic study of deep mantle electrical conductivity beneath the Hawaiian islands [J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1975, 43(1): 17–46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb00626.x
[2]	FILLOUX J H. Ocean-floor magnetotelluric sounding over North Central Pacific [J]. Nature, 1977, 269(5626): 297–301. doi: 10.1038/269297a0
[3]	OLDENBURG D W. Conductivity structure of oceanic upper mantle beneath the Pacific plate [J]. Geophysical Journal International, 1981, 65(2): 359–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1981.tb02717.x
[4]	SHANKLAND T J, O’CONNELL R J, WAFF H S. Geophysical constraints on partial melt in the upper mantle [J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1981, 19(3): 394–406. doi: 10.1029/RG019i003p00394
[5]	EVANS R L, HIRTH G, BABA K, et al. Geophysical evidence from the MELT area for compositional controls on oceanic plates [J]. Nature, 2005, 437(7056): 249–252. doi: 10.1038/nature04014
[6]	NAIF S, KEY K, CONSTABLE S, et al. Melt-rich channel observed at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary [J]. Nature, 2013, 495(7441): 356–359. doi: 10.1038/nature11939
[7]	GAILLARD F, MALKI M, IACONO-MARZIANO G, et al. Carbonatite melts and electrical conductivity in the asthenosphere [J]. Science, 2008, 322(5906): 1363–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.1164446
[8]	KARATO S I. The role of hydrogen in the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle [J]. Nature, 1990, 347(6290): 272–273. doi: 10.1038/347272a0
[9]	WANG D, MOOKHERJEE M, XU Y, et al. The effect of water on the electrical conductivity of olivine [J]. Nature, 2006, 443(7114): 977–980. doi: 10.1038/nature05256
[10]	YOSHINO T, MATSUZAKI T, YAMASHITA S, et al. Hydrous olivine unable to account for conductivity anomaly at the top of the asthenosphere [J]. Nature, 2006, 443(7114): 973–976. doi: 10.1038/nature05223
[11]	YOSHINO T, MATSUZAKI T, SHATSKIY A, et al. The effect of water on the electrical conductivity of olivine aggregates and its implications for the electrical structure of the upper mantle [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 288(1/2): 291–300.
[12]	POE B T, ROMANO C, NESTOLA F, et al. Electrical conductivity anisotropy of dry and hydrous olivine at 8 GPa [J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2010, 181(3/4): 103–111.
[13]	DUBA A G, SHANKLAND T J. Free carbon & electrical conductivity in the Earth’s mantle [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1982, 9(11): 1271–1274. doi: 10.1029/GL009i011p01271
[14]	LASTOVICKOVÁ M. A review of laboratory measurements of the electrical conductivity of rocks and minerals [J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1991, 66(1/2): 1–11.
[15]	DAI L, KARATO S. High and highly anisotropic electrical conductivity of the asthenosphere due to hydrogen diffusion in olivine [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2014, 408: 79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpgl.2014.10.003
[16]	DAI L, KARATO S. The effect of pressure on the electrical conductivity of olivine under the hydrogen-rich conditions [J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2014, 232: 51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2014.03.010
[17]	YANG X. Orientation-related electrical conductivity of hydrous olivine, clinopyroxene and plagioclase and implications for the structure of the lower continental crust and uppermost mantle [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2012, 317: 241–250.
[18]	XU Y, SHANKLAND T J, DUBA A G. Pressure effect on electrical conductivity of mantle olivine [J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 2000, 118(1/2): 149–161.
[19]	YOSHINO T, SHIMOJUKU A, SHAN S, et al. Effect of temperature, pressure and iron content on the electrical conductivity of olivine and its high-pressure polymorphs [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2012, 117(B8): 205–220.
[20]	YOSHINO T, ZHANG B, RHYMER B, et al. Pressure dependence of electrical conductivity in forsterite [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2017, 122(1): 158–171. doi: 10.1002/2016JB013555
[21]	BORUP K A, FISCHER K F, BROWN D R, et al. Measuring anisotropic resistivity of single crystals using the van der Pauw technique [J]. Physical Review B, 2015, 92(4): 045210. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.045210
[22]	SHEN Y, KUMAR R S, PRAVICA M, et al. Characteristics of silicone fluid as a pressure transmitting medium in diamond anvil cells [J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2004, 75(11): 4450–4454. doi: 10.1063/1.1786355
[23]	MAO H K, XU J A, BELL P M. Calibration of the ruby pressure gauge to 800 kbar under quasi-hydrostatic conditions [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1986, 91(B5): 4673–4676. doi: 10.1029/JB091iB05p04673
[24]	刘锦, 孙樯. 硅油作为压力计的拉曼光谱研究 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2010, 30(9): 2390–2392. doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2010)09-2390-03 LIU J, SUN Q. Raman spectroscopic study on silicone fluid as pressure gauge [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2010, 30(9): 2390–2392. doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2010)09-2390-03
[25]	王晓霞, 李志慧, 陈晨, 等. 硅油的高压拉曼散射 [J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2014, 35(11): 2384–2389. WANG X X, LI Z H, LI C, et al. High pressure Raman spectra of silicone oil [J]. Chemical Journal of Chinese Universities, 2014, 35(11): 2384–2389.
[26]	ROBERTS J J, TYBURCZY J A. Frequency dependent electrical properties of polycrystalline olivine compacts [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1991, 96(B10): 16205–16222. doi: 10.1029/91JB01574
[27]	SINCLAIR D C, WEST A R. Impedance and modulus spectroscopy of semiconducting BaTiO₃ showing positive temperature coefficient of resistance [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1989, 66(8): 3850–3856. doi: 10.1063/1.344049
[28]	JOHNSON D. ZView: a software program for IES analysis. Version 2.8 [CP/OL]. Southern Pines, NC: Scribner Associates [2019-03-05]. http://www.scribner.com.
[29]	ZHA C, DUFFY T S, DOWNS R T, et al. Brillouin scattering and X-ray diffraction of San Carlos olivine: direct pressure determination to 32 GPa [J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1998, 159(1/2): 25–33.
[30]	DU FRANE W L, TYBURCZY J A. Deuterium-hydrogen exchange in olivine: implications for point defects and electrical conductivity [J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2012, 13(3): Q03004.
[31]	GODDAT A, PEYRONNEAU J, POIRIER J P. Dependence on pressure of conduction by hopping of small polarons in minerals of the Earth’s lower mantle [J]. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 1999, 27(2): 81–87. doi: 10.1007/s002690050243
[32]	KATSURA T, SATO K, ITO E. Electrical conductivity of silicate perovskite at lower-mantle conditions [J]. Nature, 1998, 395(6701): 493–495. doi: 10.1038/26736
[33]	LIN J F, WEIR S T, JACKSON D D, et al. Electrical conductivity of the lower-mantle ferropericlase across the electronic spin transition [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2007, 34(16): L16305.
[34]	OHTA K, HIROSE K, ONODA S, et al. The effect of iron spin transition on electrical conductivity of (Mg,Fe)O magnesiowüstite [J]. Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series B, 2007, 83(3): 97–100. doi: 10.2183/pjab.83.97
[35]	YOSHINO T, ITO E, KATSURA T, et al. Effect of iron content on the spin transition pressure of ferropericlase [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2011, 116(B4): B04202.
[36]	DOBSON D P, RICHMOND N C, BRODHOLT J P. A high-temperature electrical conduction mechanism in the lower mantle phase (Mg, Fe)_{1- x}O [J]. Science, 1997, 275(5307): 1779–1781. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5307.1779
[37]	NEAL S L, MACKIE R L, LARSEN J C, et al. Variations in the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle beneath North America and the Pacific Ocean [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2000, 105(B4): 8229–8242. doi: 10.1029/1999JB900447
[38]	TARITS P, HAUTOT S, PERRIER F. Water in the mantle: results from electrical conductivity beneath the French Alps [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31(6): 265–282.
[39]	JUNG H, KARATO S. Water-induced fabric transitions in olivine [J]. Science, 2001, 293: 1460–1463. doi: 10.1126/science.1062235