基于固有型内聚力模型模拟双层夹胶玻璃冲击断裂行为

姚蓬飞; 韩阳; 姚芬; 李志强

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20190718

基于固有型内聚力模型模拟双层夹胶玻璃冲击断裂行为

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20190718

姚蓬飞^1,,
韩阳¹,
姚芬¹,
李志强^{1, 2, 3,*, ,}

1.
太原理工大学应用力学与生物医学工程研究所，山西太原　030024
2.
太原理工大学山西省材料强度与结构冲击重点实验室，山西太原　030024
3.
力学国家级试验教学示范中心（太原理工大学），山西太原　030024

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11672199）

详细信息

作者简介:
姚蓬飞（1993－），男，硕士研究生，主要从事冲击动力学研究. E-mail：454235864@qq.com

通讯作者:
李志强（1973－），男，博士，教授，主要从事冲击动力学研究. E-mail：lizhiqiang@tyut.edu.cn

中图分类号: O347.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 7348
- HTML全文浏览量: 3542
- PDF下载量: 45
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-01-21
- 修回日期: 2019-03-19

Simulation of the Impact Fracture Behavior of Double Laminated Glass Based on Intrinsic Cohesive Model

YAO Pengfei^1
,,
HAN Yang¹,
YAO Fen¹,
LI Zhiqiang^{1, 2, 3,*
, ,}

1.
Institute of Applied Mechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
2.
Shanxi Key Laboratory of Material Strength and Structural Impact, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
3.
Mechanics National Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究双层夹胶玻璃（LG）在冲击荷载作用下的裂纹扩展规律，采用零厚度固有型内聚力单元裂纹扩展方法建立了球形锤头冲击下两边支撑的LG动力响应的计算模型，内聚力单元使用最大主应力失效准则，探讨玻璃罚刚度K值和厚度对裂纹形成路径、范围和数量以及下面板位移的影响。结果表明：（1）冲击荷载作用下，上玻璃板中心首先产生大量细小裂纹和玻璃颗粒，随后径向裂纹不断向外扩展，同时产生大量环向裂纹；（2）随着玻璃K值的增加，LG裂纹扩展范围缩小、数量减少，下玻璃板中心位移减小；（3）随着玻璃厚度的增大，LG裂纹范围缩小、数量减少，下玻璃板中心位移减小。研究结果为LG抗冲击设计和安全防护提供了直接依据。
- 冲击荷载 /
- 双层夹胶玻璃 /
- 裂纹扩展 /
- 固有型内聚力单元 /
- 罚刚度
Abstract: In order to investigate the crack propagation law of double layered laminated glass (LG) under impact load, a model for calculating the dynamic response of the both sides support LG under the impact of a spherical hammer head is established by using the zero-thickness intrinsic cohesive method. The maximum principal stress failure criterion is applied to the intrinsic cohesive element. The effects of penalty stiffness K and thickness of glass on crack formation path, range and number, as well as the displacement of lower panel were discussed. Simulation results show that: (1) under the impact load, a large number of fine cracks and glass particles are first generated in the center of LG upper glass plate, and then a large number of circumferential cracks are generated in the process of continuous outward propagation of radial cracks; (2) with the increase of the K value of the glass penalty stiffness, the crack growth range and the number of cracks decrease, and the center displacement of the lower glass plate decreases; (3) with the increase of glass thickness, the crack range and number decrease, and the center displacement of the lower glass plate decreases. The results provide a direct basis for LG shock resistant design and safety protection.
- impact load /
- double layered laminated glass /
- crack propagation /
- intrinsic cohesive /
- penalty stiffness

HTML全文

图 1 内聚力破坏过程

Figure 1. Cohesive failure process

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 LG冲击破坏后的裂纹路径

Figure 3. Crack path of laminated glass after impact failure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 LG模型

Figure 2. Laminated glass model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 网格划分

Figure 4. Mesh generation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 双线性内聚力本构模型

Figure 5. Bilinear constitutive model of cohesion

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 试验与仿真所得冲击力曲线对比

Figure 6. Comparison of impact force curve obtained from test and simulation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 试验与仿真所得LG裂纹对比

Figure 7. Comparison diagram of laminated glass crack obtained by test and simulation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 冲击荷载作用下LG裂纹扩展的试验结果

Figure 8. Experimental result of LG crack growth under impact load

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 LG破坏机理图（左列）及其仿真结果（右列）

Figure 9. The failure mechanism diagram of LG (left column) and its simulation results (right column)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 LG标件在不同K值下的裂纹模态

Figure 10. Crack modes of LG specimens at different K values

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 不同玻璃厚度的LG裂纹模态（K=500 GPa/mm）

Figure 11. LG crack modes with different glass thicknesses (K=500 GPa/mm）

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 不同K值的LG中心位移时程曲线

Figure 12. LG center displacement time-history curves with different penalty stiffnesses K

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 不同玻璃厚度的LG中心位移时程曲线

Figure 13. LG center displacement time-history curves with different thicknesses of glass layer

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 各材料物性参数

Table 1. Physical parameters of each material

Material	Material type	$\rho $/(kg·m^–3)	$\nu $	E/GPa	D₁	C₁₀/MPa	C₀₁/MPa
Glass	Elasticity	2 500	0.2	74
Impactor	Elasticity	7 850	0.27	206
PVB	Hyperelasticity	1 000	0.49		0.012	1.60	0.06
Supporter	Hyperelasticity	1 100	0.49		0.023	0.874	0.009
Note: $\nu $ is the Poission’s ratio, D₁, C₁₀ and C₀₁ are material parameters.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 模拟工况

Table 2. The simulated cases

Case No.	Thickness of upper glass plate/mm	Thickness of PVB/mm	Thickness of lower glass plate/mm	Penalty stiffness K/(GPa·mm^–1)
G1	1	0.76	1	500
G2	2	0.76	2	500
G3	3	0.76	3	500
G4	4	0.76	4	500
G5	5	0.76	5	500
G6	6	0.76	6	500
K1	2	0.76	2	500
K2	2	0.76	2	750
K3	2	0.76	2	1 000
K4	2	0.76	2	1 250

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(16)

[1]	CAMANHO P P, DAVILA C G, DE MOURA M F. Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials [J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2003, 37(16): 1415–1438. doi: 10.1177/0021998303034505
[2]	SU X, YANG Z, LIU G. Finite element modelling of complex 3D static and dynamic crack propagation by embedding cohesive elements in Abaqus [J]. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2010, 23(3): 271–282. doi: 10.1016/S0894-9166(10)60030-4
[3]	XU J, LI Y. Crack analysis in PVB laminated windshield impacted by pedestrian head in traffic accident [J]. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 2009, 14(1): 63–71. doi: 10.1080/13588260802462427
[4]	PENG Y, YANG J, DECK C, et al. Finite element modeling of crash test behavior for windshield laminated glass [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 57: 27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.01.010
[5]	CHEN S, ZANG M, XU W. A three-dimensional computational framework for impact fracture analysis of automotive laminated glass [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 294: 72–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2015.06.005
[6]	PELFRENE J, DAM S V. Numerical analysis of the peel test for characterisation of interfacial debonding in laminated glass [J]. International Journal of Adhesion & Adhesives, 2015, 62: 146–153.
[7]	GAO W, XIANG J, CHEN S, et al. Intrinsic cohesive modeling of impact fracture behavior of laminated glass [J]. Materials & Design, 2017, 127: 321–335.
[8]	RAVICHANDAR K, YANG B. On the role of microcracks in the dynamic fracture of brittle materials [J]. Journal of the Mechanics & Physics of Solids, 1997, 45(4): 535–563.
[9]	PARAMESWARAN V, SHUKLA A. Crack-tip stress fields for dynamic fracture in functionally gradient materials [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 1999, 31(9): 579–596. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6636(99)00025-3
[10]	RAHUL-KUMAR P, JAGOTA A, BENNISON S J, et al. Polymer interfacial fracture simulations using cohesive elements [J]. Acta Materialia, 1999, 47(15/16): 4161–4169.
[11]	CHEN S, ZANG M, WANG D, et al. Numerical analysis of impact failure of automotive laminated glass: a review [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 122: 47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.04.007
[12]	GOUTIANOS S, SØRENSEN B F. Path dependence of truss-like mixed mode cohesive laws [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2012, 91: 117–132. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.011
[13]	BENZEGGAGH M, KENANE M. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus [J]. Composites Science and Technology, 1996, 56(4): 439–449. doi: 10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X
[14]	LEE T W. The energy release rate for two-dimensional crack problems with centrifugal loads [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1995, 51(5): 741–752. doi: 10.1016/0013-7944(94)00308-5
[15]	PELFRENE J, KUNTSCHE J, VAN DAM S, et al. Critical assessment of the post-breakage performance of blast loaded laminated glazing: experiments and simulations [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 88: 61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.09.008
[16]	XU J, LI Y, GE D, et al. Experimental investigation on constitutive behavior of PVB under impact loading [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(2): 106–114.