Processing math: 100%

纤维编织材料超高速撞击特性实验研究

苗常青 徐铧东 靳广焓 孙甜甜 祖振南

陈磊, 张云, 陈雨轩, 魏群, 张美光. K2N2中一维氮链的压力诱导聚合[J]. 高压物理学报, 2024, 38(4): 040104. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20240719
引用本文: 苗常青, 徐铧东, 靳广焓, 孙甜甜, 祖振南. 纤维编织材料超高速撞击特性实验研究[J]. 高压物理学报, 2019, 33(2): 024203. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180654
CHEN Lei, ZHANG Yun, CHEN Yuxuan, WEI Qun, ZHANG Meiguang. Pressure-Induced Polymerization of One-Dimensional Nitrogen Chains in K2N2[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2024, 38(4): 040104. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20240719
Citation: MIAO Changqing, XU Huadong, JIN Guanghan, SUN Tiantian, ZU Zhennan. Experimental Study of Hypervelocity Impact Characteristics for Fiber Fabric Materials[J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(2): 024203. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180654

纤维编织材料超高速撞击特性实验研究

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180654
详细信息
    作者简介:

    苗常青(1972-),男,博士,教授,主要从事柔性复合材料与充气结构研究. E-mail:miaocqhit@163.com

  • 中图分类号: O347; V423

Experimental Study of Hypervelocity Impact Characteristics for Fiber Fabric Materials

  • 摘要: 与铝合金等材料相比,纤维编织材料具有质量轻、可柔性折叠等优点,可应用于柔性充气展开防护结构,进而构建多屏、大间距防护结构,提升防护效率。考虑不同性能纤维编织材料对多屏防护结构防护性能的影响,通过实验研究了不同材料制成的多屏防护结构对空间碎片的防护性能,防护屏材料包括玄武岩纤维编织材料、芳纶纤维编织材料及铝板。在超高速弹丸撞击载荷作用下,与多屏铝板防护结构相比,多屏纤维编织材料防护结构具有更高的防碎片撞击效果;对多屏纤维编织材料防护结构来说,前两屏采用玄武岩纤维编织材料,后两屏采用芳纶纤维编织材料时,防护效果更好,说明多屏防护结构的前置防护屏采用软化温度较高的无机纤维编织材料时,可能会更好地破碎弹丸,从而提高防护结构的碎片撞击防护性能。

     

  • Metal nitrides have attracted increasing attention in a wide range application due to their fascinating properties, such as hardness, superconductivity, various types of magnetism, etc.[12] Recently, extensive efforts have focused on the synthesis and design of metal polynitrides with single and double nitrogen bonds under high pressure, as metal polynitrides are proposed to be promissing candidates for high-energy density materials (HEDMs)[35]. The decomposition of these polynitrides is expected to release huge energy due to the conversion from a single/double-bonded polymeric nitrogen (160/418 kJ/mol) into a triple-bonded nitrogen (954 kJ/mol) molecule without producing pollutants. The atomic polymeric nitrogen with cubic gauche structure (cg-N) at a high pressure and high temperature (HPHT) condition (pressure above 110 GPa and temperature greater than 2 000 K) was successfully synthetized by Eremets et al.[68]. Motivated by that synthesis, alkali metal azides AN3, constructed by spherical cations and linear molecular N3 anions with N=N double bonds, was proposed to be suitable precursor in the formation of polymeric nitrogen under pressure[9]. Experimentally, the polymeric evolutionary behaviors of N3 anions in LiN3[10], NaN3[1113], KN3[1416], RbN3[1718], and CsN3[1920] have been fully investigated under high pressure. One of the most interesting findings is the reported polymeric nitrogen nets in NaN3[11] at 160 GPa. More recently, a fully sp2-hybridized layered polymeric nitrogen structure, featuring fused 18-membered rings, in potassium supernitride (K2N16) was successfully synthesized under HPHT condition using a laser heating diamond anvil cell (DAC) technique[21]. In our previous works[2225], the N3 anions in LiN3, NaN3, and KN3 all transform firstly to “N6” molecular clusters under compression, and then to a polymerized nitrogen phase at high pressures.

    Besides the well-known alkali metal azides AN3, alkali metal diazenides A2N2 containing the N=N double bonds, were also proposed as precursors of the polymeric atomic nitrogen under pressure. In 2010, two alkali metal diazenides, Li2N2 and Na2N2, were proposed to have orthorhombic Pmmm structure[26]. However, an orthorhombic Immm structure of Li2N2[27] was then synthesized under HPHT condition. Immediately after that, a serial pressure-induced structural phase transitions of Li2N2 were reported in two independent works[2829]. Moreover, a high-pressure tetragonal I41/acd phase containing the spiral nitrogen chain was uncovered at 242 GPa[29], indicating that the polymerization of nitrogen is realized from Li2N2.

    Compared to Li2N2 and Na2N2, K2N2 have not been reported so far, neither for ambient pressure nor for high pressure. Here, we will extensively explore the high-pressure structures of K2N2 up to 150 GPa by using the first principles swarm structure searching method. The structure evolutions and chemical bonding behaviors of K2N2 within different structures were then fully studied to provide an insight into the formation of polymeric nitrogen in alkali metal diazenides.

    The variable-cell crystal structure predictions for K2N2 (1–4 formula unit (f. u.) in the simulation cell) up to 150 GPa were conducted by CALYPSO code[3031]. The effectiveness of this method has been fully confirmed in predicting high-pressure structures of various systems[3235]. During the structure search process, the 60% structures of each generation with lower enthalpies were selected to generate the structures for the next generation by particle swarm optimization (PSO) technique, and the other structures in new generation were randomly generated to increase the structural diversity. Usually, the structure searching simulation stopped at the 20th generation and 40 structures per generation were generated at each pressure point. After finishing the structure search, the most stable structures were used for further structural relaxation and property calculation, a process that is implemented in the Vienna ab Initio Simulation Package[36]. The Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) exchange-correlation functional under the generalized gradient approximation[37] and the projector-augmented wave (PAW)[38] for ion-electron potentials were adopted herein. The van-der-Waals (vdW) correction was applied in the structural relaxation using Grimme’s method (DFT-D3)[39]. The cutoff energy of 550 eV and Monkhorst-Pack k meshes[40] of 2π×0.032 Å−1 were used to ensure the good convergences of total energy and maximum force on each atom. The lattice dynamic stability of each structure was checked by phonon spectrum obtained by PHONOPY code[41]. The charge transfer behavior of K2N2 was performed using Bader atoms-in-molecules (AIM) method[42].

    The ground-state structure for K2N2 at ambient pressure in our fully structural search (in Fig. 1(a)) is a monoclinic structure with the space group C2/m, which is different from those reported for Li2N2 and Na2N2[26]. In Fig. 1(a), the N2 quasimolecule dimers in C2/m structure are parallel to each other, and are tilted by a certain angle within a-b plane. The N-N bond length is 1.192 Å, which is a typical value for double bond. Also, the calculated Mayer bond order[43] for the N2 anion in the C2/m is 2.18, being consistent with double bond. Due to the weak interaction between the N2 quasimolecules in the C2/m phase, the application of gigapascal pressure leads to the orientation change of N2 quasimolecules and the structure transformation. Indeed, two stable orthorhombic structures, i.e. Pmmm and Cmmm, for K2N2 were uncovered at 2 and 5 GPa, respectively, as shown in Fig. 1(b) and Fig. 1(c). Remarkably, the unveiled Pmmm phase and the previously reported ground-state structure of Na2N2 are exactly isostructrual (the Pmmm phase denoted as the Na2N2-type phase hereafter), and the Cmmm phase of K2N2 and the high-pressure metastable structures of Na2N2 are isostructrual as well[26]. Furthermore, both Na2N2-type and Cmmm orthorhombic phases have the similar atomic arrangement that the parallel N2 dimers are perpendicular to the K atomic layer. In the Na2N2-type and Cmmm phases, the calculated N-N bond lengths are 1.220 and 1.254 Å, while the characteristics of the N=N double bond are as that of the C2/m structure in the ground-state. As the pressures rises to 150 GPa, a stable monoclinic C2/c structure, containing a folded one-dimensional nitrogen chains (see Fig. 1(d)), is identified for K2N2 for the first time. The lengths of two nonequivalent N-N bond in C2/c structure are 1.474 and 1.373 Å at 135 GPa, indicating genuine N―N single bond, and thus the nature of the structure is similar to that of the high-pressure phase of NaN3[24]. Table 1 lists the structural details of the lattice parameters and the atomic positions of various K2N2 structures at selected pressure points.

    Figure  1.  Crystal structure of C2/m, Na2N2-type, Cmmm, and C2/c phases (The large and small spheres represent K and N atoms, respectively.)
    Table  1.  Optimized structural parameters of the C2/m, Na2N2-type, Cmmm, and C2/c phases of K2N2
    Phase Pressure/GPa Lattice parameters dN-N Atomic fractional coordinates
    C2/m0a = 7.562 Å, b = 3.912 Å, c = 10.923 Å,
    α = γ = 90°, β= 134.955°
    1.192K 4i (0.613, 0, 0.260)
    N 4i (0.519, 0, 0.456)
    Na2N2-type2.5a = 3.326 Å, b = 4.375 Å, c = 5.694 Å,
    α = β = γ = 90°
    1.220K1 1e (0, 0.500, 0)
    K2 1c (0, 0, 0.500)
    N 2t (0.500, 0.500, 0.393)
    Cmmm20.0a = 6.896 Å, b = 5.104 Å, c = 2.855 Å,
    α = β = γ = 90°
    1.254K 4g (0.694, 0, 0)
    N 4j (0, 0.877, 0.500)
    C2/c135.0a = 6.971 Å, b = 4.099 Å, c = 4.510 Å,
    α = γ = 90°, β= 81.342°
    1.474, 1.373K 8f (0.669, 0.909, 0.198)
    N 8f (0.041, 0.887, 0.102)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The phonon dispersion curves of the four predicted structures are illustrated in Fig. 2 in order to check their dynamic stabilities. Fig. 2 shows that all the K2N2 phases are dynamically stable as the eigen frequencies of their lattice vibrations are positive for all wavevectors in the Brillouin zone. It should be noted that the predicted C2/m, Na2N2-type, and Cmmm phases exhibit higher eigen frequencies of around 50 THz, which correspond to the vibrations of N2 quasimolecules with stronger N=N double bonds. By contrast, the C2/c phase shows relative lower vibration frequencies of around 30−35 THz, corresponding to the vibration frequencies of weaker N―N single bonds.

    Figure  2.  Calculated phonon curves of the C2/m (a), Na2N2-type (b), Cmmm (c), and C2/c (d) phases at selected pressure points

    Herein, we evaluated the energy involved in the decomposition of the C2/c phase with polymerized N―N single bond chains into metal K and gaseous N2. The energy involved in the C2/c-K2N2 decompostion was determined to be 0.344 kJ/g, which is about three times of that of conventional energetic materials (0.104−0.105 kJ/g)[44], but much smaller than those reported for high-energy density materials (3.61 kJ/g for BeN4, 5.30 kJ/g for GaN5, 4.81 kJ/g for GaN10)[4546]. This may be due to the low nitrogen content in K2N2, so the nitrogen-rich KNx (x> 1) is expected to be potential HEDM under high pressure.

    To determine the phase transition pressure of K2N2, we plotted in Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) the enthalpy difference of the predicted C2/m, Cmmm, and C2/c structures relative to the Na2N2-type phase in the pressure range of 0−150 GPa. The inset of Fig. 3(a) shows that above 1.7 GPa the Na2N2-type phase becomes energetically preferable with respect to the ground-state C2/m structure and is enthalpically stable up to about 3.6 GPa, above which it transforms into the Cmmm structure. From Fig. 3(b), it can be seen that the Cmmm structure persists up to 122 GPa and then transforms to the C2/c structure according to our structural predictions and enthalpy difference calculations. The wide pressure range of stable Cmmm phase may be attributed to the relative smaller ionic radius and atomic mass of K atom,in contrast with the heavier Rb and Cs atoms. It is thus expected that the chemical precompression exerted by heavier atoms, such as Rb and Cs, in A2N2 (as for Cs2N2[43]) can yield lower pressures for the polymerization of one-dimension N chains. From the calculated pressure dependence of the volume per f. u. in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d), the volume collapses of the first-order transformations C2/m→Na2N2-type, Na2N2-type→Cmmm, and CmmmC2/c are 14.4%, 22.5%, and 4.0% respectively. Thus, the Cmmm phase is much stiffer than low-pressure C2/m and Na2N2-type phases under compression. This is consistent with the increasing coordination number of the K atom in the different K2N2 phases under compression in Figs. 3(c) and 3(d). The densification of K2N2 under pressure is realized by increasing the cation coordination number from 5 in ground-state C2/m phase to 8 in Na2N2-type (K2 atoms are coordinated by eight N atoms and K1 atoms are fourfold coordinated by four N atoms) and Cmmm phases, and finally to 10 in C2/c phase.

    Figure  3.  (a)–(b) Enthalpy differences of the different predicted structures relative to the Na2N2-type structure under pressure;(c)–(d) pressure dependence of the volume per f. u. of each structure for K2N2

    To get deeper insight into the electronic structure evolutions of these K2N2 phases under pressure, we calculated the total density of states (DOS) and the site projected DOS, as shown in Fig. 4, where the Fermi level is the vertical dotted line. In contrast with the semiconducting nature of C2/c phase (Fig. 4(d)), the C2/m, Na2N2-type, and Cmmm phases are all metallic with the N-p electron crossing the Fermi level. Thus, the K2N2 possesses a metal-semiconductor transition, that is similar to that of Li-N system in recent work[28]. From Fig. 4(a)–Fig. 4(c), the C2/m, Na2N2-type, and Cmmm phases exhibit similar projected DOS profiles in the valence band region, the K-s and K-p atomic orbitals are located at the deep energy levels (around −32 and −16 eV, respectively), and the N-s atomic orbitals mainly lie around −22 − −10 eV. Moreover, the interaction between K and N atoms is extremely weak due to the absence of overlapping regions in their atomic projected DOSs. From the inspection of the DOS profiles, a clear broadening of different atomic decomposed states is seen in the high-pressure C2/c phase (Fig. 4(d)), leading to clear hybridizations between K-p and N-p atomic orbitals. In contrast to the first three low-pressure K2N2 phases, this distinction is partially due to the increasing coordination number of K atoms in C2/c phase and to the resulting chemical bonding change that will be illustrated in the following Bader charge transfer analysis.

    Figure  4.  Total and site projected DOSs of C2/m (a), Na2N2-type (b), Cmmm (c), and C2/c (d) phases

    Fig. 5 presents the PBE-resulted energy band structures of the four K2N2 phases, the projected weights of K-s, K-p, and N-s orbital electrons are not taken into account herein because of their exceptionally tiny contributions around the Fermi level in Fig. 4. Compared to the strong metallic nature of the Cmmm phase, which is mainly dominated by N-px/N-pz at the considered energy range of −2 − 2 eV (Fig. 5(c)), the C2/m ( Na2N2-type) phase exhibits a relative weaker metallic behavior that two bands of N-py/N-pz (N-px/N-py) crossing the Fermi level in Fig. 5(a) (Fig. 5(b)). The indirect semiconducting nature of C2/c phase (band gap of 2.0 eV) is demonstrated in Fig. 5(d), with the valence band maximum (VBM) and conduction band minimum (CBM) is located at A and E points, respectively. It is further found that the VBM and CBM of the C2/c phase are principally composed of N-px and N-pz orbitals, respectively.

    Figure  5.  Projected weights of N-p orbitals in the band structures of C2/m (a), Na2N2-type (b), Cmmm (c), and C2/c phases (d) (The Fermi level is indicated by horizontal lines and the black solid lines denote the energy structures of each phase of K2N2)

    Fig. 6 shows the projected two-dimensional (2D) electron localization functions (ELF) of the four K2N2 phases to further reveal the atomic chemical bonding. The ELF is used to characterize the localized distribution of electrons of different atoms. The ELF values of 1, 0.5, and close to 0 indicate strong electron localization, electron gas, and nonelectron localization, respectively. From Fig. 6(a)–Fig. 6(c), the high-ELF regions are distributed between two N atoms, indicating the strong covalent N-N bonding in the C2/m, Na2N2-type, and Cmmm phases. Lone-pair electrons of K remain from the C2/m to Cmmm phases under pressure, as illustrated by the ELF value of 0 around K atoms, which is in conformity with the projected atomic orbital DOSs described in Fig. 4(a)–Fig. 4(c). For the compressed C2/c phase, some lone-pair electrons of K still remain, yet some of them are transferred to the regions of the K-N bond. Hence, the pressure compels the K-p lone-pair electrons to participate in the chemical bonding with N-p electrons under compression, realizing the high pressure C2/c phase with increased coordination number of K atoms. The electron localization on N-N bond in the C2/c phase (Fig. 6(d)) is weaker than that in the other three low-pressure K2N2 phases, confirming that the N―N single bond of the polymerized one-dimensional nitrogen chains is weaker than the N=N double bond of the N2 quasimolecules.

    Figure  6.  Contours of ELF for the C2/m on the (010) plane (a), Na2N2-type on the (010) plane (b), Cmmm on the (100) plane (c), and C2/c on the (010) plane (d)

    Finally, the Bader charges in the four phases are listed in Table 2 by using the Bader AIM method. For the ground-state C2/m phase, each N atom accepts 0.491e which corresponds to the electron loss per K atom. When phase transits into the Na2N2-type and Cmmm phases, a relatively stronger ionic bonding feature of K-N bond is disclosed because that the charge transfer is raised to approximately 0.645e − 0.690e as a result of the electron gain of N. Contrarily, it is noted that the atomic charge transfer from the K atom to N atom decrease to 0.623e in the compressed C2/c phase. This variation may be originated from that partial K atoms participate in covalent bonding with the N atom under compression, as indicated by the orbital hybridizations of K-p and N-p in Fig. 4(d). It then can be concluded that the chemical bonding in the C2/c phase containing one-dimensional polymerized nitrogen chains is a complex mixture of covalent and ionic characteristics.

    Table  2.  Calculated Bader charges of K and N atoms in C2/m, Na2N2-type, Cmmm, and C2/c phases
    Phase Pressure/GPa Atom Charge value/e Charge transfer/e
    C2/m 0 K
    N
    8.509 (×2)
    5.491 (×2)
    +0.491
    −0.491
    Na2N2-type 2.5 K1
    K2
    N
    8.407
    8.303
    5.645 (×2)
    +0.593
    +0.697
    −0.645
    Cmmm 20.0 K
    N
    8.310 (×2)
    5.690 (×2)
    +0.690
    −0.690
    C2/c 135.0 K
    N
    8.377 (×2)
    5.623 (×2)
    +0.623
    −0.623
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In summary, we have performed a systematic crystal structure search for alkali metal diazenide K2N2 under pressure using the advanced swarm intelligence structure simulations. The ground-state phase of K2N2 is determined to be a new monoclinic C2/m structure with N2 quasimolecules, and three high-pressure structures of K2N2, including Na2N2-type (1.7−3.6 GPa), Cmmm (3.6−122.0 GPa), and C2/c (above 122.0 GPa), are identified. Remarkably, the pressure-induced polymerization of one-dimensional nitrogen chains in the high-pressure C2/c semiconducting phase is firstly reported, attributed to the participation of K-p lone-pair electrons in the chemical bonding under pressure. The occurrences of the high-pressure phases of Na2N2-type, Cmmm, and C2/c follow the increased coordination numbers (from 5 to 10) of K atoms with the incresed pressures, accompanied by significant N-N bonding modification from N=N dimers to polymerized N―N single bond one-dimensional chains. Furthermore, a metal-semiconductor transition of K2N2 under pressure is demonstrated by the electronic structures calculations. The present findings provide fundamental insights into the high-pressure structures and the polymerization of N atoms of alkali metal diazenides, supplying useful guidance for the syntheses of K2N2 in further experimental efforts.

  • 图  玄武岩纤维编织材料防护屏

    Figure  1.  Scheme of basalt fabric shield

    图  多屏防护结构示意

    Figure  2.  Schematic of multilayer structure shields

    图  多屏防护结构装配图

    Figure  3.  Assembly drawing of multilayer structure shields

    图  实验1撞击实验结果

    Figure  4.  Experiment results of Shot 1

    图  实验2撞击实验结果

    Figure  5.  Experiment results of Shot 2

    图  实验3撞击实验结果

    Figure  6.  Experiment results of Shot 3

    图  实验4撞击实验结果

    Figure  7.  Experimental results of Shot 4

    图  铝板多屏防护结构撞击实验结果

    Figure  8.  Experimental results of Al multilayer structure shields

    表  1  玄武岩和芳纶纤维材料力学性能参数

    Table  1.   Material properties of basalt and aramid fibers

    Material Modulus/GPa Strength/GPa Elongation rate/% Critical temperature/°C
    Basalt fiber 93.1–110 3.8–4.8 3.1 >1050 (Softening)
    Aramid fiber ≥125 4.5–5.5 2.5–3.5 >530 (Decomposition)
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  多屏防护结构超高速撞击实验结果对比

    Table  2.   Results of hypervelocity impact tests for multilayer shields

    Exp. No. Structure v/(km·s–1) R/mm n Damage of the 4th shield
    1 BF×3+Al×2 3.80 55 3 Crater×4 (d=0.5–1.0 mm)
    2 AF×3+Al×2 3.83 50 2 No damage
    3 AF×2+BF×2+Al 3.92 51 3 Crater×1 (d=1 mm), bundle fracture×2
    4 BF×2+AF×2+Al 3.84 56 2 No damage
    5 Al×5 3.36 47 3 Small bulge×2
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] CHRISTIANSEN E L. Meteoroid/debris shielding [M]. Houston: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2003.
    [2] 郑世贵, 闫军. 空间碎片防护需求与防护材料进展 [J]. 国际太空, 2014(6): 49–53

    ZHENG S G, YAN J. Progress in space debris protection requirements and protective materials [J]. Space International, 2014(6): 49–53
    [3] 韩增尧, 庞宝君. 空间碎片防护研究最新进展 [J]. 航天器环境工程, 2012, 29(4): 369–378

    HAN Z Y, PANG B J. Review of recent development of space debris protection research [J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2012, 29(4): 369–378
    [4] CHRISTIANSEN E L, NAGY K, LEAR D M, et al. Space station MMOD shielding [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2009, 65(7/8): 921–929.
    [5] WEN X, HUANG J, LI Y, et al. Preliminary study on shielding performance of wood stuffed shield [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 91: 94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.12.006
    [6] SCHONBERG W P, WILLIAMSEN J E. Calculating hole size and crack length in multi-wall systems following an orbital debris impact [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 109: 335–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.07.015
    [7] RYAN S, CHRISTIANSEN E L. Hypervelocity impact testing of advanced materials and structures for micrometeoroid and orbital debris shielding [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2013, 83: 216–231. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.09.012
    [8] VERMA P N, DHOTE K D. Characterising primary fragment in debris cloud formed by hypervelocity impact of spherical stainless steel projectile on thin steel plate [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2018, 120: 118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.05.003
    [9] CHANGQING M, BO L. Experimental study on the behavior of a new multilayer shield against hypervelocity debris impact [J]. Polymers & Polymer Composites, 2014, 22(2): 99.
    [10] KE F, HUANG J, WEN X, et al. Test study on the performance of shielding configuration with stuffed layer under hypervelocity impact [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2016, 127: 553–560. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.06.037
    [11] 苗常青, 谭惠丰, 曹昱, 等. 在轨充气展开并刚化的抗空间碎片和微流星体的防护系统: CN101353087 [P]. 2009-01-28.

    MIAO C Q, TAN H F, CAO Y, et al. A protective system against space debris and micrometeoroids that is inflated and rigid in orbit: CN101353087 [P]. 2009-01-28.
    [12] 苗常青, 曹昱, 王友善, 等. 多层空腔式充气展开防护机构: CN101367440 [P]. 2009-02-18.

    MIAO C Q, CAO Y, WANG Y S, et al. Multi-layer cavity type inflation expansion protection structure: CN101367440 [P]. 2009-02-18.
    [13] 马晓青, 韩峰. 高速碰撞动力学 [M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 1998.
    [14] 张庆明, 黄风雷. 超高速碰撞动力学引论 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000.
    [15] CHRISTIANSEN E L, KERR J H, DE LA FUENTE H M, et al. Flexible and deployable meteoroid/debris shielding for spacecraft [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1999, 23(1): 125–136. doi: 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00068-8
    [16] RUDOLPH M, SCHÄFER F, DESTEFANIS R, et al. Fragmentation of hypervelocity aluminum projectiles on fabrics [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2012, 76: 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.02.002
    [17] 管公顺, 蒲东东, 哈跃, 等. 不同环境温度下铝球弹丸高速撞击编织物防护屏试验研究 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2015, 51(3): 66–72

    GUAN G S, PU D D, HA Y, et al. Experimental investigation of woven bumper shield impacted by a high-velocity aluminum sphere at different ambient temperature [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, 51(3): 66–72
    [18] 管公顺, 李航杰, 刘家赫, 等. 非金属弹丸高速撞击编织物填充式结构的损伤 [J]. 材料研究学报, 2016, 30(5): 329–335

    GUAN G S, LI H J, LIU J H, et al. Investigation into damage of woven stuffed shield impacted by high-velocity nonmetallic projectile [J]. Chinese Journal of Materials Research, 2016, 30(5): 329–335
    [19] 苗常青, 杜明俊, 黄磊, 等. 空间碎片柔性防护结构超高速撞击试验研究 [J]. 载人航天, 2017, 23(2): 173–176 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5825.2017.02.006

    MIAO C Q, DU M J, HUANG L, et al. Experimental research on hypervelocity impact characteristics of flexible anti-debris multi-shields structure [J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2017, 23(2): 173–176 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5825.2017.02.006
    [20] 哈跃, 刘志勇, 管公顺, 等. 玄武岩纤维布超高速撞击损伤分析 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2012, 26(5): 557–563 doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2012.05.012

    HA Y, LIU Z Y, GUAN G S, et al. Damage investigation of hypervelocity impact on woven fabric of basalt fiber [J]. Chinese Journai of High Pressure Physics, 2012, 26(5): 557–563 doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2012.05.012
    [21] 林慧国. 中外铝合金牌号对照速查手册 [M]. 北京:机械工业出版社, 2007.
    [22] 唐恩凌, 徐名扬, 张庆明, 等. 超高速撞击厚靶过程的能量分配研究 [J]. 固体力学学报, 2016, 37(2): 152–160

    TANG E L, XU M Y, ZHANG Q M, et al. Study on partitioning of energy in hypervelocity impact on thick target [J]. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics, 2016, 37(2): 152–160
    [23] 张品亮, 龚自正, 曹燕, 等. 超高速撞击下47Zr45Ti5Al3V合金的宏观与微观响应行为 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2017, 31(3): 231–238 doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2017.03.004

    ZHANG P L, GONG Z Z, CAO Y, et al. Macro- and micro-damage behaviors of 47Zr45Ti5Al3V alloy in hypervelocity impact [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2017, 31(3): 231–238 doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2017.03.004
    [24] 经福谦. 实验物态方程导引 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  8383
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4450
  • PDF下载量:  28
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-10-15
  • 修回日期:  2018-11-12

目录

/

返回文章
返回