舱室模型内爆炸载荷下预制孔板的变形规律

赵鹏铎; 王庆; 张磊; 张鹏; 黄松; 徐豫新

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20180531

舱室模型内爆炸载荷下预制孔板的变形规律

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180531

赵鹏铎^1,,
王庆^{1, 2},
张磊¹,
张鹏^{1, 2},
黄松^{1, 2},
徐豫新³

1.
海军研究院, 北京 100161
2.
中北大学机电工程学院, 山西太原 030051
3.
北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室, 北京 100081

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 11302259

详细信息

作者简介:
赵鹏铎(1983-), 男, 博士, 工程师, 主要从事舰船爆炸毁伤与防护研究. E-mail:zhaopengduo@163.com

中图分类号: O521.9;O383.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 8107
- HTML全文浏览量: 2856
- PDF下载量: 21
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-03-28
- 修回日期: 2018-04-10

Deformation of Plates with Pre-formed Holes under Internal Blast Loading in Cabin Model

ZHAO Pengduo^1
,,
WANG Qing^{1, 2},
ZHANG Lei¹,
ZHANG Peng^{1, 2},
HUANG Song^{1, 2},
XU Yuxin³

1.
Naval Research Academy, Beijing 100161, China
2.
College of Mechatronic Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究舱室模型内爆炸载荷下预制孔板的动态响应，实验验证舱室模型内偏置孔板和均匀孔板的变形规律，并与无孔板的变形规律对比，同时建立了一种模拟舱室的仿真模型，进行内爆炸载荷下的数值计算，分析典型测点内爆炸冲击波的分布，研究预制孔板的挠度变形规律。结果表明：预制孔板的局部强度减弱对挠度变形的增益大于泄爆效应的影响，内爆冲击波在舱室模型内部存在反射和汇聚现象，并在毫秒量级后期存在准静态特性，模拟结果与实验结果一致，同时预制孔板不同区域减薄率存在差异。研究结果可以为舱内爆炸冲击波-破片耦合损伤作用的机理分析提供依据。
- 舱室模型 /
- 预制孔板 /
- 内爆冲击波 /
- 挠度增益 /
- 减薄率
Abstract: In order to investigate the dynamic response of plates with preformed holes under internal blast load in the cabin model, the deformations of the plates with offset preformed holes and the plates with uniform preformed holes in the cabin model were experimentally investigated.The results are also compared with that of the plates with non-preformed holes.The numerical calculation of the internal blast load was carried out by using established simulation model of cabin.The distribution of internal blast shock waves at typical gauge points was analyzed and the deformation rules of plates with preformed holes were studied as well.The research results indicate that the effect of gain of deflection deformation obtained from decreasing local strength due to the preformed holes is greater than that of the blast venting.The shock wave exhibits the reflection and convergence phenomena inside the cabin model and a quasi-static feature during the late stage of milliseconds.The simulation results are consistent with the experimental ones.At the same time, there are differences between the thinning rates in different areas of the plates with preformed holes.The current research can provide reference for the analysis of the mechanism of coupling damage between shock wave and fragments in the cabin.
- cabin model /
- plates with pre-formed holes /
- internal blast shock waves /
- gain of deflection /
- thinning rate

HTML全文

图 1 预制孔板设计流程

Figure 1. Design flow of pre-formed holes plate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 实验模型

Figure 2. Experimental setup

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 目标板变形效果

Figure 3. Deformation of target plates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 目标板侧视图

Figure 4. Side view of target plates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 减薄率测试区域划分

Figure 5. Area division of thinning rate tests

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 各区域减薄率

Figure 6. Thinning rate in different areas

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 计算模型

Figure 7. Numerical model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 预制孔板计算模型

Figure 8. Numerical model of preformed holes plate

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 内爆冲击波传播云图

Figure 9. Contour of internal blast shock wave propagation

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 仿真测点上的冲击波压力时程曲线

Figure 10. Shock wave overpressure-time history curves at simulated gauge points

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 目标板变形和最大挠度

Figure 11. Target plates deformation and maximum deflection

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 三种目标板中点位移曲线

Figure 12. Midpoint displacement-time curve of three target plates

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 实验最大变形挠度

Table 1. Experimental maximum deformation deflection

Target plate	Maximum deformation deflection/mm
Target plate	Measured value	Deviation	Correction value
1-1	85.6	-2.1	83.5
1-2	86.5	-2.1	84.4
2-1	88.8	-2.1	86.7
2-2	92.2	-4.5	87.7
3-1	101.5	-10.3	91.2
3-2	109.8	-15.8	94.0

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 减薄率统计

Table 2. Thinning rate statistics

Target plate	Target plate actual thickness/mm		Mid point thickness/mm	The average of Mid area/mm		The average of edge area/mm
1-1	1.76		1.37	1.56		1.62
1-2	1.83		1.37	1.68		1.75
3-1	1.84		1.50	1.56		1.68
3-2	1.77		1.31	1.56		1.68

Target plate	Target plate actual thickness/ mm	Mid point thickness/ mm	The average of Mid area 1/mm	The average of Mid area 2/mm	The average of edge area 1/mm	The average of edge area 2/mm
2-1	1.82	1.43	1.56	1.56	1.72	1.56
2-2	1.81	1.56	1.62	1.56	1.81	1.62

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 Q235钢参数

Table 3. Parameters of Q235 steel

ρ/(kg·m^-3)	EOS	Bulk modulus/ GPa	Ref.temperature/K	Specific heat/ (J·kg^-1·K^-1)
7 830	Linear	175	293	477

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 Cowper-Symonds强度模型部分参数

Table 4. Some parameters of Cowper-Symonds strength model

Shear modulus/GPa	Yield stress/MPa	n	D/s^-1	q
80	235	0	40	5

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 测点冲量对比

Table 5. Impulse comparison between gauge points

Gauge	Total impulse/(Pa·s)
Gauge	in 1 ms	in 2 ms	in 6 ms
1	996.10	1 787.58	5 143.99
2	921.76	1 707.36	5 052.09
3	742.53	1 500.95	4 719.41

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 挠度对比与误差

Table 6. Deflection comparison and deviation

Target plate	Maximum deflection/mm		deviation/%
Target plate	Exp.	Sim.	deviation/%
Non preformed hole plate	83.95	72.05	-14.18
Offset preformed holes plate	87.20	74.69	-14.35
Uniform preformed holes plate	92.60	79.16	-14.51

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(13)

[1]	RUSHTON N, SCHLEYER G K, CLAYTON A M, et al.Internal explosive loading of steel pipes[J].Thin-Walled Structuers, 2008, 46(7/8/9):870-877. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263823108000359
[2]	柏小娜, 李向东, 杨亚东.封闭空间内爆炸冲击波超压计算模型及分布特性研究[J].爆破器材, 2015, 44(3):22-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2015.03.005 BAI X N, LI X D, YANG Y D.Calculation model and the distribution of wave pressure under internal explosion in closed space[J].Explosive Materials, 2015, 44(3):22-26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2015.03.005
[3]	FELDGUN V R, KOCHETKOV A V, KARINSKI Y S, et al.Internal blast loading in a buried lined tunnel[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 35(3):172-183. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734743X07000073
[4]	侯海量, 朱锡, 李伟, 等.舱内爆炸冲击载荷特性实验研究[J].船舶力学, 2010, 14(8):901-907. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2010.08.011 HOU H L, ZHU X, LI W, et al.Experimental studies on characteristics of blast loading when exploded inside ship cabin[J].Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2010, 14(8):901-907. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2010.08.011
[5]	孔祥韶.爆炸载荷及复合多层防护结构响应特性研究.武汉:武汉理工大学, 2013:52-56. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis/Y2364126 KONG X S.Research on the blast loadings and the response of multi-laver protective structure.Wuhan:Wuhan University of Technology, 2013:52-56. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis/Y2364126
[6]	AUNE V, VALSAMOS G, CASADEI F, et al.On the dynamic response of blast-loaded steel plates with and without pre-formed holes[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 108(4):27-46. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=d18ff3d323b85b0a702c9928f709a9ba
[7]	RAKVÅG K G, UNDERWOOD N J, SCHLEYER G K, et al.Transient pressure loading of clamped metallic plates with pre-formed holes[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 53(3):44-55. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=a07446669f032aa99fcdc47aaec69b56
[8]	蒋建伟, 侯俊亮, 门建兵, 等.爆炸冲击波作用下预制孔靶板塑性变形规律的研究[J].高压物理学报, 2014, 28(6):723-728. http://www.gywlxb.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1768.shtml JIANG J W, HOU J L, MEN J B, et al.Study on deformation of perforated plates under blast loading[J].Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2014, 28(6):723-728. http://www.gywlxb.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1768.shtml
[9]	黄寅生.炸药理论[M].北京:北京理工大学出版社, 2016. HUANG Y S.Explosive theory[M].Beijing:Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2016.
[10]	侯海量, 朱锡, 梅志远.舱内爆炸载荷及舱室板架结构的失效模式分析[J].爆炸与冲击, 2007, 27(2):151-158. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2007.02.010 HOU H L, ZHU X, MEI Z Y.Study on the blast load and failure mode of ship structure subject to internal explosion[J].Explosion and Shock Waves, 2007, 27(2):151-158. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1455.2007.02.010
[11]	刘土光, 胡要武, 郑际嘉.固支加筋方板在爆炸载荷作用下的刚塑性动力响应分析[J].爆炸与冲击, 1994, 14(1):55-65. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199400166734 LIU T G, HU Y W, ZHENG J J.Dynamic reeponse analysis of rigid perfectly plastic calmped square plates with stiffener subjected to blast loading[J].Explosion and Shock Waves, 1994, 14(1):55-65. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199400166734
[12]	汪维, 张舵, 卢芳云, 等.大当量TNT装药爆轰的远场数值模拟及超压预测[J].弹箭与制导学报, 2010, 30(1):127-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2010.01.039 WANG W, ZHANG D, LU F Y, et al.Simulation of thousands kilograms of TNT explosion shock wave in air at distance far away and forecast of the peak overpressure[J].Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2010, 30(1):127-130. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2010.01.039
[13]	周杰, 陶钢, 潘宝清, 等.AUTO-DYN模拟炸药爆炸问题的分析[J].火炸药学报, 2012, 35(5):33-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2012.05.008 ZHOU J, TAO G, PAN B Q, et al.Analysis of the problems of simulating the explosive blast by AUTO-DYN[J].Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2012, 35(5):33-37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2012.05.008