Numerical Simulation of Responses and Failure Modes of Reinforced Concrete Beams under Drop-Weight Impact Loadings
-
摘要: 钢筋混凝土在动态冲击下表现出与静态加载不同的结构响应，且破坏模式更为复杂。在钢筋三折线本构模型中引入应变率效应，利用ABAQUS显式动力分析模块，对钢筋混凝土梁在不同高度冲击下的结构响应进行了数值模拟。得到的冲击力和跨中挠度时程曲线与实验结果吻合较好，验证了模型的有效性。基于该模型，研究了配筋率分别为2.56%、2.66%和2.76%时，钢筋混凝土梁在不同冲击速度下的结构响应。结果表明：增大配筋率能够提高梁的承载能力；随冲击速度的增大，配筋率对梁抗变形能力的增强效果逐渐减弱；当冲击速度为4.85 m/s时，配筋率对梁破坏模式的影响微弱；当冲击速度大于4.85 m/s时，随配筋率的减小，破坏模式由剪切破坏转变为弯曲破坏。Abstract: Reinforced concrete structural members subjected to impact loads behave quite differently as compared to those subjected to quasi-static loading, with their failure mode becoming more complex.In this work, by introducing the strain rate effect of reinforcement in the trilinear model of the reinforcement, we simulated the structural responses of reinforced concrete beams under different impact loadings based on the dynamic analysis module of ABAQUS.The curves of impact-time and mid-point deflection-time were observed to agree well with those from the experiments.Based on this model, we simulated the responses of beams with the reinforcement ratios of 2.56%, 2.66%, and 2.76%, respectively.The comparison shows that the bearing capacity and deformation resistance of the beams increased with the increase of the reinforcement ratios; the enhancement effect of the reinforcement ratio weakens gradually as the impact velocity increases; when the impact velocity is 4.85 m/s, the reinforcement ratios have slight effect on the failure mode of beam at low impact velocities; in addition, when the impact velocity is higher than 4.85 m/s, the failure mode changes from shear failure to bending failure with the decrease of the reinforcement ratio.
-
Key words:
- drop weight impact /
- reinforcement ratio /
- strain rate effect /
- reinforced concrete
-
图 3 冲击速度为9.60 m/s时的冲击力时程曲线
Figure 3. Time history curves of the impact forces at v=9.60 m/s
图 4 不同冲击速度下的跨中挠度曲线
Figure 4. Time history curves of the mid-point deflection at different impact velocities
图 5 不同冲击速度下冲击力-跨中挠度曲线
Figure 5. Time history curves of impact relative to mid-point deflection at different velocities
图 7 不同配筋率梁在不同冲击速度下的冲击力时程曲线
Figure 7. Time history curves of impact force for reinforced beams with different reinforcement ratios at different impact velocities
图 8 不同配筋率梁在不同冲击速度下的跨中挠度时程曲线
Figure 8. Deflection time curves of beams with different reinforcement ratios at different impact velocities
图 9 不同配筋率梁在不同冲击速度下的冲击力-跨中挠度曲线
Figure 9. Impact loading-mid-point displacement curves for beams with different reinforcement ratios at different impact velocities
Dilation angle/(°) Eccentricity fb0/fc0 K Viscosityparameter Density/(kg·m-3) E/GPa ν 30 0.1 1.16 0.666 7 0.000 5 2 400 26.48 0.167 
下载: 导出CSV
Reinforced grades Diameter/mm ρ/(kg·m-3) E/GPa ν Yield strength/MPa Ultimate strength/MPa HPB235 8 7 862 210 0.3 400 540 HRB335 10 7 860 200 0.3 438 687 HRB335 12 7 850 200 0.3 438 687
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 模拟与实验结果对比
Table 3. Comparison of results between FEM and experiment
Method Drop height (m)/Mass (kg) Impact velocity/(m·s-1) Maximum impact force/kN Maximum deflection of mid-point/mm Experiment 1.2/124 104.0 28.3 FEM -/124 4.85 149.1 30.7 Experiment 2.4/124 94.7 51.2 FEM -/124 6.86 134.7 56.5 Experiment 4.8/124 173.9 90.4 FEM -/124 9.60 181.2 102.9
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 冲击力峰值结果对比
Table 4. Comparison of the results of maximum impact force
Impact velocity/(m·s-1) Reinforcement ratio:2.56% Reinforcement ratio:2.66% Reinforcement ratio:2.76% Max. impact force/kN Time/ms Max. impact force/kN Time/ms Max. impact force/kN Time/ms 4.85 114 0.66 149(+30.0%) 0.6 170(+49.0%) 0.5 6.86 125 0.50 134(+7.2%) 0.5 201(+60.8%) 0.4 9.60 169 0.33 181(+7.1%) 0.3 222(+31.3%) 0.3
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 跨中位移峰值结果对比
Table 5. Comparison of results of maximum mid-point deflection
Impact velocity/(m·s-1) Reinforcement ratio:2.56% Reinforcement ratio:2.66% Reinforcement ratio:2.76% Max. deflection/mm Time/ms Max. deflection/mm Time/ms Max. deflection/mm Time/ms 4.85 38.26 16.0 31.72(-17.10%) 13.32 27.70(-27.60%) 12.3 6.86 68.15 25.5 56.56(-17.00%) 17.30 49.73(-27.03%) 15.6 9.60 120.33 26.0 102.94(-14.43%) 25.00 91.37(-24.07%) 21.0
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] OŽBOLT J, RAH K K, MEŠTROVIĈD.Influence of loading rate on concrete cone failure[J].International Journal of Fracture, 2006, 139(2):239-252. doi: 10.1007/s10704-006-0041-3 [2] TRAVAŠ V, OŽBOLT J, KOŽAR I.Failure of plain concrete beam at impact load:3D finite element analysis[J].International Journal of Fracture, 2009, 160(1):31-41. doi: 10.1007/s10704-009-9400-1 [3] 付应乾, 董新龙.落锤冲击下钢筋混凝土梁响应及破坏的实验研究[J].中国科学:技术科学, 2016, 46(4):400-406. doi: 10.1360/N092015-00337FU Y Q, DONG X L.An experimental study on impact response and failure behavior of reinforced concrete beam[J].Scientia Sinica:Technological, 2016, 46(4):400-406. doi: 10.1360/N092015-00337 [4] SAATCI S, VECCHIO F J.Effects of shear mechanisms on impact behavior of reinforced concrete beams[J].ACI Structural Journal, 2009, 106(1):78-86. [5] ZHAN T, WANG Z, NING J.Failure behaviors of reinforced concrete beams subjected to high impact loading[J].Engineering Failure Analysis, 2015, 56:233-243. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.02.006 [6] ZINEDDIN M, KRAUTHAMMER T.Dynamic response and behavior of reinforced concrete slabs under impact loading[J].International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2007, 34(9):1517-1534. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.10.012 [7] 范向前, 胡少伟.不同配筋率对钢筋混凝土三点弯曲梁断裂韧度的影响[J].水电能源科学, 2013, 31(12):117-121. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=sdny201312031&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQFAN X Q, HU S W.Effects of various reinforcement ratio on fracture toughness of reinforced concrete for three-points bending beams[J].Water Resources and Power, 2013, 31(12):117-121. http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=sdny201312031&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ [8] 沈培峰.配筋率对混凝土断裂参数的影响[J].防灾减灾工程学报, 2013, 33(2):235-240. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shaowei_Hu/publication/272609888_Influence_of_Reinforcement_Ratios_on_Concrete_Fracture_Parameters/links/57e1083508ae52b3078c57fe.pdf?origin=publication_listSHEN P F.Influence of reinforcement ratio on concrete fracture parameters[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2013, 33(2):235-240. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shaowei_Hu/publication/272609888_Influence_of_Reinforcement_Ratios_on_Concrete_Fracture_Parameters/links/57e1083508ae52b3078c57fe.pdf?origin=publication_list [9] BANTHIA N, MINDESS S, BENTUR A, et al.Impact testing of concrete using a drop-weight impact machine[J].Experimental March, 1989, 29(1):63-69. doi: 10.1007/BF02327783 [10] RAO M C, BHATTACHARYYA S K, BARAI S V.Behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete under drop weight impact load[J].Construction and Building Materials, 2011, 25(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.055 [11] 任晓虎, 霍静思, 陈柏生.火灾下钢管混凝土梁落锤冲击试验研究[J].振动与冲击, 2012, 30(20):110-115. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jingsi_Huo2/publication/289149807_Anti-impact_behavior_of_concrete-filled_steel_tubular_beams_in_fire/links/5763f27f08ae1658e2ea2074.pdf?origin=publication_detailREN X H, HUO J S, CHEN B S.Anti-impact behavior of concrete-filled steel tubular beams in fire[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 30(20):110-115. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jingsi_Huo2/publication/289149807_Anti-impact_behavior_of_concrete-filled_steel_tubular_beams_in_fire/links/5763f27f08ae1658e2ea2074.pdf?origin=publication_detail [12] 展婷变, 宁建国, 王志华.冲击载荷下钢筋混凝土力学行为的研究[J].高压物理学报, 2016, 30(2):109-115. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.02.004ZHAN T B, NING J G, WANG Z H.Mechanical behavior of reinforced concrete under dynamic loading[J].Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2016, 30(2):109-115. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.02.004 [13] 李敏, 李宏男.钢筋混凝土梁动态试验与数值模拟[J].振动与冲击, 2015, 34(6):110-115. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZDCJ201506021.htmLI M, LI H N.Dynamic tests and numerical simulation of reinforced concrete beams[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(6):110-115. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZDCJ201506021.htm [14] JIANG H, WANG X, HE S.Numerical simulation of impact tests on reinforced concrete beams[J].Materials and Design, 2012, 39(15):111-120. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261306912000751 [15] 刘巍, 徐明, 陈忠范.ABAQUS混凝土损伤塑性模型参数标定及验证[J].工业建筑, 2014(增刊1):167-171. http://www.docin.com/p-1535116684.htmlLIU W, XU M, CHEN Z F.Parameters calibration and verification of concrete damage plasticity model of ABAQUS[J].Industrial Construction, 2014(Suppl 1):167-171. http://www.docin.com/p-1535116684.html [16] 林峰, 顾祥林, 匡昕昕, 等.高应变率下建筑钢筋的本构模型[J].建筑材料学报, 2008, 11(1):14-20. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_jzclxb200801003LIN F, GU X L, KUANG X X, et al.Constitutive models for reinforcing steel bars under high strain rates[J].Journal of Building Materials, 2008, 11(1):14-20. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_jzclxb200801003 [17] 中国建筑科学研究院. 混凝土设计规范: GB 50010-2010[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 8634
- HTML全文浏览量: 3678
- PDF下载量: 478
