有机玻璃-空气层结构对爆炸水池水下爆炸地基振动的影响

汪泉; 汤有富; 李志敏; 宫婕; 程扬帆; 刘上豪; 李成孝

doi:10.11858/gywlxb.20170611

有机玻璃-空气层结构对爆炸水池水下爆炸地基振动的影响

doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.20170611

汪泉^{1, 2,},
汤有富^{1, 3},
李志敏¹,
宫婕¹,
程扬帆¹,
刘上豪¹,
李成孝¹

1.
安徽理工大学化学工程学院, 安徽淮南 232001
2.
安徽理工大学土木工程博士后流动站, 安徽淮南 232001
3.
浙江物产光华民爆器材有限公司, 浙江衢州 324400

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金 11502001

中国博士后基金面上项目 2014M561808

安徽省博士后基金项目 2014B035

详细信息

作者简介:
汪泉(1980—), 男, 博士, 副教授, 主要从事爆炸力学研究.E-mail:wqaust@163.com

中图分类号: O383.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 6774
- HTML全文浏览量: 2769
- PDF下载量: 150
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-07-06
- 修回日期: 2017-07-18

Influence of Plexiglass-Air Interlayer Structure on Foundation Vibration of Small Pool Underwater Explosion

1.
School of Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
2.
Postdoctoral Research Station of Civil Engineering, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China
3.
Zhejiang Guanghua Property Blasting Equipment Company Limited, Quzhou 324400, China

摘要

摘要: 为了研究有机玻璃-空气层结构对水下爆炸振动的影响, 采用NUBOX-6016爆破振动测试仪监测小水池(直径5.5 m、高3.62 m)中该结构下水下爆炸引起的地基振动信号, 研究不同空气层厚度对最大振动速度的影响; 基于Matlab软件编写相关程序对测得的振动信号进行Hilbert-Huang变换(HHT), 分析不同空气层厚度对振动信号全局频率的影响。结果表明:对于有机玻璃-空气层结构, 随着空气层厚度的增加, 最大振动速度呈先减小后增大的趋势, 当空气层厚度为120 mm时隔振效果最佳; 通过对振动信号的HHT分析得到全局频率所对应的幅值, 5~15 Hz低频区间段的幅值衰减较明显, 且振动作用时间缩短, 能够有效防止水下爆炸与建/构筑物之间产生共振现象。所得试验结果及分析对水下爆破工程防护及军事舰艇防雷仓结构设计等具有一定参考价值。
- 水下爆炸 /
- 有机玻璃-空气层结构 /
- 爆炸振动 /
- Hilbert-Huang变换
Abstract: To study the influence of the plexiglass-air interlayer structure on underwater explosion vibration, the foundation vibration signals for this structure caused by underwater explosion in the small pool (5.5 m in diameter and 3.62 m in height), the influence of different air interlayer thicknesses on the maximum vibration velocity was studied, HHT (Hilbert-Huang Transform) was used to analyze the vibration test signals by writing relevant programs based on Matlab software, studying the influence of different air interlayer thickness on the global frequency of vibration signals.Experimental results show that:under the condition of plexiglass-air interlayer structure, with the increase of air interlayer thickness, the maximum vibration velocity decreases first and then increases, and the vibration isolation effect is the best when the thickness is 120 mm.The amplitude corresponding to the global frequency can be obtained by means of HHT analysis, the amplitude attenuation of the 5-15 Hz low frequency section is obvious, the action time is shortened, which can effectively prevent the resonance phenomenon between the building and structure.The experimental results and analysis have certain theoretical reference value for underwater blasting engineering protection and structural design of lightning protection bunker for military ship.
- underwater explosion /
- plexiglass-air interlayer structure /
- explosion vibration /
- Hilbert-Huang transform

HTML全文

图 1 有机玻璃-空气层结构

Figure 1. Picture of plexiglass-air interlayer structure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 振动测试系统(1.爆炸水池; 2.固定架; 3.8号标准雷管; 4.空气隔层; 5.发爆器; 6.1^#、2^#、3^#测振仪)

Figure 2. Vibration test system (1.Explosion pool; 2.Fixed mount; 3.Detonator; 4.Air interlayer; 5.Initiator; 6.1^#, 2^#, 3^# vibration measurer)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同厚度空气层对各测点振速的影响

Figure 3. Influence of different thicknesses of air interlayer on vibration velocity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同厚度水隔层对各测点振速的影响

Figure 4. Influence of different thicknesses of water interlayer on vibration velocity

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 原始振动信号

Figure 5. Original vibration signal

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 EMD分解后得到各IMF分量

Figure 6. IMF components by EMD decomposition

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 1 m处充80 mm水隔层垂向振动Hilbert谱

Figure 7. Vertical vibration Hilbert spectrum of the 80 mm water-filled interlayer at 1 m

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 不同空气层厚度条件下的垂向振动Hilbert谱

Figure 8. Hilbert spectrum of vertical vibration of different thicknesses of air interlayer

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 不同距离、不同厚度空气层对水下爆炸振动的影响

Table 1. Influence of distances and thickness of air interlayer on underwater explosion vibration

Distance/m	Direction	Main vibration frequency/Hz				Maximum vibration velocity/(cm·s^-1)
Distance/m	Direction	∅40 mm	∅80 mm	∅120 mm	∅160 mm	∅40 mm	∅80 mm	∅120 mm	∅160 mm
1	z	56.763	56.763	56.763	56.763	0.086	0.070	0.054	0.070
2	z	56.763	56.763	56.763	44.556	0.118	0.097	0.082	0.101
3	z	56.763	56.763	56.763	56.763	0.080	0.071	0.061	0.086

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同距离、不同厚度水隔层对水下爆炸振动的影响

Table 2. Influence of distances and thickness of water interlayer on underwater explosion vibration

Distance/m	Direction	Main vibration frequency/Hz				Maximum vibration velocity/(cm·s^-1)
Distance/m	Direction	∅40 mm	∅80 mm	∅120 mm	∅160 mm	∅40 mm	∅80 mm	∅120 mm	∅160 mm
1	z	62.256	62.256	62.256	56.763	0.086	0.169	0.184	0.185
2	z	62.256	62.256	62.256	62.256	0.155	0.145	0.160	0.161
3	z	62.256	62.256	62.256	62.256	0.101	0.097	0.107	0.116

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 信号经EMD分解后相关参数

Table 3. Related parameters of the signal by EMD decomposition

IMF	Variance	Proportion/%
C₁	0	1.646 3
C₂	0	0.862 9
C₃	0	0.626 8
C₄	0.000 1	70.307 9
C₅	0	20.200 7
C₆	0	2.208 9
C₇	0	1.254 8
C₈	0	1.081 4
C₉	0	1.719 6
C₁₀	0	0.015 0
C₁₁	0	0.060 6
C₁₂	0	0.015 0

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(18)

[1]	库尔·P. 水中爆炸[M]. 罗耀杰, 等译. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1960. COLE P. Underwater explosion[M]. Translated by LUO Y J, et al. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1960.
[2]	RAJENDRAN R, LEE J M.Blast loaded plates[J].Marine Structures, 2009, 22(2):99-127. doi: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2008.04.001
[3]	张社荣, 孔源, 王高辉.水下和空中爆炸冲击波传播特性对比分析[J].振动与冲击, 2014, 33(13):148-153. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZDCJ201413027.htm ZHANG S R, KONG Y, WANG G H.Comparative analysis on propagation characteristics of shock wave induced by underwater and air explosions[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(13):148-153. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZDCJ201413027.htm
[4]	高建华, 陆林, 何洋扬.浅水中爆炸及其破坏效应[M].北京:国防工业出版社, 2010. Gao J H, LU L, HE Y Y.Explosion and its damage effect in shallow water[M].Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2010.
[5]	WANG G H, ZHANG S R, YU M, et al.Investigation of the shock wave propagation characteristics and cavitation effects of underwater explosion near boundaries[J].Applied Ocean Research, 2014, 46(2):40-53. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014111871400011X
[6]	PETROV N V, SCHMIDT A A.Multiphase phenomena in underwater explosion[J].Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2015, 60:367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2014.05.008
[7]	樊自建, 沈兆武, 马宏昊, 等.空气隔层对水中冲击波衰减效果的实验研究[J].中国科学技术大学学报, 2007, 37(10):1306-1311. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2007.10.025 FAN Z J, SHEN Z W, MA H H, et al.Experimental study on attenuation of underwater shock wave by air interlayer[J].Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 2007, 37(10):1306-1311. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2007.10.025
[8]	贾虎, 郑伟花, 罗强, 等.爆炸气泡帷幕对水中冲击波能量的衰减特性[J].含能材料, 2015, 23(10):1015-1019. doi: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2015.10.018 JIA H, ZHENG W H, LUO Q, et al.Attenuation characteristics of underwater explosion bubble curtain on the shock[J].Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2015, 23(10):1015-1019. doi: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2015.10.018
[9]	贾虎, 沈兆武.空气隔层对水中冲击波的衰减特性[J].爆炸与冲击, 2012, 32(1):61-66. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)01-0061-06 JIA H, SHEN Z W.An investigation into attenuation of underwater shockwave by air interlayer[J].Explosion and Shock Waves, 2012, 32(1):61-66. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)01-0061-06
[10]	寇晓枫, 王高辉, 卢文波, 等.空气隔层对水下爆炸冲击波的缓冲效应[J].振动与冲击, 2017, 36(3):7-13. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zdycj201703002 KOU X F, WANG G H, LU W B, et al.Mitigation effects of air interlayer on underwater explosion shock wave[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(3):7-13. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zdycj201703002
[11]	姚熊亮, 杨文山, 初文华, 等.水中空气隔层衰减冲击波性能研究[J].高压物理学报, 2011, 25(2):165-172. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2011.02.013 YAO X L, YANG W S, CHU W H, et al.Research on performance of the underwater air buffer weakening shock wave[J].Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2011, 25(2):165-172. doi: 10.11858/gywlxb.2011.02.013
[12]	姚熊亮, 刘文韬, 张阿漫, 等.水下爆炸气泡及其对结构毁伤研究综述[J].中国舰船研究, 2016, 11(1):36-45. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgjcyj201601006 YAO X L, LIU W T, ZHANG A M, et al.Review of the research on underwater explosion bubbles and the corresponding structural damage[J].Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2016, 11(1):36-45. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgjcyj201601006
[13]	刘欣, 顾文彬, 陈学平.气泡帷幕对水中冲击波衰减特性的数值模拟研究[J].爆破, 2015, 32(3):79-84. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2015.03.014 LIU X, GU W B, CHEN X P.Numerical simulation study of attenuation characteristics of water shock wave under bubble curtain[J].Blasting, 2015, 32(3):79-84. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2015.03.014
[14]	汤有富, 汪泉, 朱恺波, 等.基于HHT变换的小水池水下爆炸振动分析[J].工程爆破, 2017, 23(1):29-33. TANG Y F, WANG Q, ZHU K B, et al.Underwater explosion vibration analysis based on HHT transform in small pond[J].Engineering Blasting, 2017, 23(1):29-33.
[15]	张义平. 爆破震动信号的HHT分析与应用研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2006. ZHANG Y P. HHT analysis and its application of blasting vibration signals[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2006.
[16]	HUANG N E, SHEN Z, LONG S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis[C]//Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. The Royal Society, 1998, 454(1971): 903-995.
[17]	PENG Z K, PETER W T, CHU F L.An improved Hilbert-Huang transform and its application in vibration signal analysis[J].Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2005, 286(1):187-205. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022460X04007928
[18]	张立, 汪大立.水下爆炸炸药能测量消除边界效应的研究[J].爆破器材, 1995(2):1-6. ZHANG L, WANG D L.A study on elimination of boundary effects in underwater explosion testing of explosive[J].Explosive Materials, 1995(2):1-6.